A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Anti-Austerity Protests Break Out In Athens And Madrid

Wednesday, September 26, 2012


Me, too, about Vegas.

The problem here is that to let the banks go bankrupt would have brought a world of hurt around the world on the 99%.  

The banks never should have been deregulated, and once they were bailed out, they've never been deregulated.  The Finance Reform bill is a joke, a disaster in waiting.  My biggest problem with Obama (and how I know him to be a con artist and in on the crimes) is that he didn't tie the bailout to regulations.  

As it stands now, all of the same practices that got us into this mess are continuing.  Another real estate balloon is taking place, with foreign investors buying American real estate on the cheap.  The mortgages are, again, being sliced and diced (along with all other types of loans), so that there will be no way to trace them.  
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Anti-Austerity Protests Break Out In Athens And Madrid


"so they can get back to reckless behavior"?

They've never stopped.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


New research shows the terrorizing impact of drones in Pakistan, false statements from US officials, and how it increases the terror threat:

An important and thoroughly documented new report on the impact of Obama's drone campaign has just been released by researchers at NYU School of Law and Stanford University Law School. Entitled "Living Under Drones: Death, Injury and Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Practices in Pakistan", the report details the terrorizing effects of Obama's drone assaults as well as the numerous, highly misleading public statements from administration officials about that campaign. The study's purpose was to conduct an "independent investigation into whether, and to what extent, drone strikes in Pakistan conformed to international law and caused harm and/or injury to civilians".

Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


We're not in a war.  It was bogus when Bush called it, and it's a bs lie that Obama is perpetuating after running on changing the Bush-Cheney 'Long War for Empire' to the criminal justice matter it always should have been.

Obama ran on knowing that it was the US foreign policy of propping up brutal dictators that creates terrorism, and he was going to change the reason for our propping up brutal dictators (corporations wanting other nations' resources on the cheap).  No sooner was he elected than he did a 180-degree turn and continued on with just about all of the Bush-Cheney policies, even going Bush-Cheney one better when it comes to violating Americans' Constitutional rights and creating enemies for Americans all around the world.

And if you're so bloodthirsty, why aren't you signing up to fight?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


I get it you dislike Gore more than Bush.

==================================

I get that you've never read my comments about BushCheney.

I think I probably dislike BushCheney more than Gore does.  And more than Obama and the Democratic Party establishment do.  I know I dislike BushCheney more than the Clintons do.

Why would I be happy with someone who wants to be put into a position of power over my life, who makes a pact with me ("give me your support and I will fight with my last breath to do a good job for you"), doesn't (Gore ran a campaign that was second only to Dukakis's in ineptness - Don't you remember the SNL debate skit, with Jon Lovitz as Gore saying after hearing the Bush character answer a debate question, "I can't believe I'm losing to this guy"), and then crawls off the edge of a cliff, retiring from public life, leaving me and the millions of others at the mercy of BushCheneyGOP?  

Do you realize that neither Gore nor the environmental lobby were at the Democratic Convention?  He/they weren't invited.  Obama has next to no interest in environmental issues -- We hear more about Clinton and Africa than about an issue that directly affects our lives and the future of civilization on the planet.  

There was a coup d'etat in 2000.  It was bloodless, to be sure, but it was a coup none the less.  And our future, of becoming a third world nation within the next 20 years, is sealed.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


New Stanford/NYU study documents the civilian terror from Obama's drones
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


There's something else that you may want to consider: The persistent claim by Nader-bashers that Gore would have been "better" than BushCheney, wouldn't have gotten us into the Iraq war.

Gore was put on the Clinton ticket because he was to the right of DLCer Clinton, both fiscally and socially.  Clinton supported Bush's decision to attack Iraq, in spite of knowing that it was all bs (as a former president, Clinton got all the same intelligence briefings that Bush got).  Gore voted for the first Gulf War.  Gore was no dove, was himself a legacy and a part of the establishment elites that see us all as "unwashed masses".  Joe Lieberman was brought onto the ticket to balance it from the right.  The Powers That Be wanted a war - Democrats voted for it.

And if you needed anymore proof of how much of a Washington insider Gore was, look at that clusterf**k Current TV.  If you're seriously trying to launch a liberal network, a counterpart to Fox, to organize a populist movement, a more mismanaged effort you couldn't find, except perhaps the Romney campaign.  Talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

Just sayin'.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mitt Romney's 47 Percent Remark Hurts Him In Swing States


'Romney's Not Making A Terribly Good Impression Right Now'

Ya think?

It's hard not to think that Romney's working for Obama.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Romney To Middle Class Ohioans: Don't Expect Too Much Tax Relief From Me


It's really hard to believe that Romney isn't working for Obama.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Romney To Middle Class Ohioans: Don't Expect Too Much Tax Relief From Me


It's both ON TOPIC and a FACT.

From raising eligibility age, and cutting benefits, Obama's put all of it on the table and Democratic leadership like Nancy Pelosi and Dick Durbin (and Bill Clinton, in his speech at the Democratic convention) have already leaked it.  I guess you missed Obama's speech at the Democratic Convention, too.

What is it that you think you're agreeing to when you cast your vote for Obama?  More of the same Republican-like legislation?  More corporate--friendly, regulation-free or regulation-unenforced, more inside lines to corporate lobbyists, more "austerity" (now there's a word that's been polished to a shine)?  

Do you know what Obama said he'd do if re-elected to a second term?:

Explaining this spring how he would manage to enact his agenda in a second term, Obama was still looking forward to sitting down and cutting deals. This time, he said, Republicans would be nicer because he’s not running for re-election.
Obama's either corrupt or he's the very definition of 'insanity', "doing the same thing over and over again hoping for a different outcome".  Or his supporters are.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Romney To Middle Class Ohioans: Don't Expect Too Much Tax Relief From Me


Only Nixon could go to China and only Obama could extend the Bush tax cuts. I am sure Republicans are already figuring out their opening positions for their next round of “negotiations” with Obama, should he win.  He's already put Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid up on the chopping block - What isn't he telling us that's we're in store for?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


Both Obama and Romney are corporate tools, but the bigger truth is that Obama's nothing but a politician at a time when we need real leadershi­p.  And I mean 'politician' in the worst sense of the word. In the 'used car salesman' sense.  It turns out that doing what's right for transnatio­nal corporations is what Obama is about, and trying to sell it as good for Americans is what he does afterwards­. He's the epitome of the 1950s Republican­, "What's good for GM is good for America," just like Romney.  He did a snow job on everybody.

There are certain Rubicon lines that Obama has crossed.  Massive overreaches and radical changes to the Constitution that started under Bush have been expanded under Obama.  And all political questions are not equal no matter how much you pivot.

The question for people to struggle with is how we ever hope to regain our moral standing and our high ground unless citizens are prepared to say, "Enough." And this is really the election where that might actually carry some weight — if people said, "Enough. We're not going to blindly support the president and be played anymore according to this blue state/red state paradigm. We're going to reconstruct instead of replicate. It might not even be a reinvented Democratic Party in the end that is a viable option. Civil libertarians are going to stand apart so that people like Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama and others know that there are certain Rubicon issues that you cannot cross, and one of them happens to be civil liberty.

Voters like you seem to only object when it's a Republican at the helm.  Voters like you refuse to hold your own's feet to the fire.  One thing is certain: There is nothing that Republican administrations have managed to do without Democrats in Congress signing on.  So with a Democrat in the White House or without one, We The People keep getting screwed.  What's it going to take to get you "organized", demanding a Democrat out of the Democratic president?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


The only difference is in their rhetoric.  Both men say one thing when they're running for office and then do something entirely different once they're in the job.  So the talk of Romney pandering to the rightwing now really means nothing. Romney wasn't the Tea Party's pick.  He's the Republican establishment's pick.  

If you're voting for Obama out of fear over what Romney would do if elected, Romney's record as governor isn't all that dissimilar from Obama's in the White House.  There were even moments of liberalism to Romney's record (gun control, state co-pays for abortion, etc.) - Certainly more progressive than Obama.  Even the Boston Globe admitted Romney's judicial picks "have generally not been is overtly partisan".  

The Boston Globe on Romney’s judicial appointments:

 

Governor Mitt Romney, who touts his conservative credentials to out-of-state Republicans, has passed over GOP lawyers for three-quarters (75%) of the 36 judicial vacancies he has faced, instead tapping registered Democrats or independents – including two gay lawyers who have supported expanded same-sex rights.

Of the 36 people Romney named to be judges or clerk magistrates, 23 are either registered Democrats or unenrolled voters who have made multiple contributions to Democratic politicians or who voted in Democratic primaries, state and local records show. In all, he has nominated nine registered Republicans, 13 unenrolled voters, and 14 registered Democrats.
On the other hand, Obama's appointments are really nothing to defend.  Both Sotomayor and Kagan are to the right of the justices that they replaced (Souter and Stevens). [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

KEEP READING
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


I'm an old OLD liberal Democrat and the old "lesser of two eviIs" argument just doesn't work anymore.  
As the head of the Democratic Party, the spotlight falls on Obama.

Obama's continuing just about all of the Bush-Chene­y policies, even going BushCo one better:  How do any of Obama's 'most ardent supporters­' explain Obama's doctrine that presidents have the right to kiII American citizens with no due process, no oversight, and his push for 'indefinite preventive detentlon' and no transparen­cy of anything a president asserts should be his secret?   Pure Kafka.  As a Democrat, I don't know how any Democrat can get behind this, or Obama's stepping up every offense that we on the left accuse conservatives of (for example, caving to the dirty energy interests, shelving regulations on clean air, issuing more offshore drilling permits than Bush-Cheney, etc.).  The pandering that you accuse Romney of is also what Obama does.

At this point, I would argue that Obama and Democrats are worse than Republicans.  Bush-Chene­y-Republicans make no bones or excuses for what they've done and who they are, whereas Obama and Democrats ran on knowing better.  "Lesser of two evils"?  No, Obama's the more effective of the two evils.  More effective on behalf of the corporate elites.  

Obama has done nothing to engender my or the People's trust.  In secret budget talks, Obama left EVERYTHING on the table, including Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.   Just as Obama ran on SinglePaye­r, then backed down, then said he wouldn't sign any legislatio­n that didn't include a public option, and then reneged, in the weeks after the election he's going to be cutting another secret budget deal with Republican­s (he'll push SimpsonBowles, the 'CatfoodCommission's' report), just like the one he cut on the lousy health insurance legislatio­n and Bush's (now Obama's) tax cuts for the rich, that ends Great Society programs.  And then there's the KeystonePipeline - Obama already put the land-grab for the southern route on the fast track.

'In bed with corporations'-secret deals is Obama's mode.  It's how he operates.  HE'S A REPUBLICAN­-IN-DEMOCR­ATS'-CLOTHING.   Obama is not a man of the People; he's a tool of the Corporatio­ns.  

Why should Obama and Democrats do anything for Obama's 'most ardent supporters' if they know they've got you over a barrel, that you're going to vote for them no matter what, because you're terrified of Republicans?

KEEP READING
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


"Known"?  By whom?  How?  

In a nation where the rule of law is king, the only "known" we recognize is in a court of law.

Are the bystanders, "collateral damage", also not a problem for you?  

How about the American citizens who have Constitutional rights to due process also "not a problem" for you?

And here's the thing about "sending seals into Pakistan to get Bin Laden":  How do you know?

What is known is thathe Pentagon has no photos of the dead OBL, and no DNA analysis was done on OBL.  Nor does any video exist of the raid, either at the scene, at the Pentagon, in the WH Situation Room. 

The greatest terrorist attack on the US and the alleged perpetrator, ill with kidney disease, a towering figure of 6'4" living and traveling among 5 and-a-half-foot people, eludes apprehension for a decade, and when we ultimately get him we quickly dispose of the body where it can never be exhumed, refuse to release photographs or anything confirming the death ("Take our word for it") and hide the SEAL team and let conflicting accounts of what happened remain.

It's as likely to be true as the official account of 9/11, where the US sent all of the steel from the WTC to China, untested, to be recycled.  

We don't do that.  We salvage downed air planes from the bottom of the ocean and reconstruct them in hangars to find out what happened.  It's why we are a nation run by rule of law and not rule of man.  Where we examine evidence in courtrooms to get to the truth.

And it's what Obama ran on in 2008, after 8 years of secrecy and overreach by a rogue BushCheney administration: Transparency and the return to rule of law.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


You presume that Nader voters would've voted for Gore (or voted at all) when studies and exit polling have indicated that's not the case.

Nader didn't do anything to Gore that Harry Browne, Pat Buchanan, Howard Phillips, et al (other party candidates) didn't also do, yet you don't hear them being blamed.  

Gore and Bush weren't owed other party's voters, and studies have shown that Nader pulled more votes from Bush than from Gore.

The fact is that Al Gore won.  Gore got more votes in Florida.  Any way it was counted (and the biggest point that people seem to forget is that there were 179,000 perfectly readable ballots that never got counted), Gore got more votes than Bush.
 
Whatever the means necessary to get BushCheney into the White House would've happened.  Had Nader been in the race, had he not in the race, whatever.  Had Nader not run, the outcome would've been the same.  The powers that be were not going to let Gore win, no matter what, and gamed it innumerable ways.  Jeb Bush's purging scheme.  CIA tampering with absentee ballots.  Have you really forgotten all of the different ways that Republicans gamed that election and the Democratic Party establishment sat by and let it happen?  Joe Lieberman, Gore's own running mate, hung them both out to dry when he went rogue and insisted that military ballots (that couldn't be certified as authentic, that didn't meet the requirements set by law about how military ballots are to be cast), military ballots that came in after the election, Lieberman insisted should be counted!

And then there was the Democratic Party's establishment, suppressing investigations, and screwing over the Congressional Black Caucus's attempts to expose that stolen election.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


On Lawrence O'Donnell's show a year and a half ago, Ralph Nader talks about Obama's deals with the GOP, extending Bush's tax cuts, taking the Democratic base for granted, and the need to primary Obama in 2012.  

These insults and aspersions only cast Obama's supporters like you as terrified of Nader, the sense he makes, and the purge of Obama and the DLC from government.
About Ralph Nader
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


You're not limited to voting for Democrats or Republicans.

Here's a list of all of the candidates running for president.

The old "lesser of two eviIs" argument reeks of denial.  Obama's continuing just about all of the BushCheney policies, even going BushCo one better:  How do any of Obama's 'most ardent supporters­' explain Obama's doctrine that presidents have the right to kill American citizens with no due process, no oversight, and his push for 'indefinite preventive detention' and no transparen­cy of anything a president asserts should be his secret?  As a Democrat, I don't know how any Democrat can get behind this.  

If Republican­s are such scvm (and I believe they are, and you must, too, as a democrat) and "so dangerous"­, why isn't Obama investigat­ing and prosecutin­g them?

Why isn't Obama investigat­ing and prosecutin­g the greatest heist on the People in all history? 

Why are Obama-Demo­crats continuing the war crimes of BushCheney­, blocking investigat­ions and prosecutio­ns into their crimes?

How does a Democratic president, on the heels of the most criminally corrupt administra­tion in the nation's history, not replace Bush-era US attorneys? Presidents may fire US attorneys, and they do so routinely at the beginning of a new administra­tion. It is unusual to fire US attorneys in mid-term (as Bush did) except in cases of gross misconduct (which wasn’t the case during the BushAdmini­stration). Instead of returning the democracy to the American people, Obama's AttorneyGe­neral has US attorneys going after legalized medicinal marijuana in the states and Bush-style obscenity prosecutions.

How do Obama's 'most ardent supporters­' explain his putting Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, veterans' care, et al, on the table for benefits' cuts?  

And then there's the escalation of wars, continued occupation of Afghanistan, NDAA, and Obama's atrocious environmental record.
 
You defend Obama at the expense of your own best interests. As long as his numbers remain high, he does the bidding of corporatio­ns and establishm­ent elites.

Why should Obama and Democrats do anything for you if they know they've got you over a barrel, that you're going to vote for them no matter what, because you're terrified of Republicans?
About Ralph Nader
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


Has it never occurred to you that your voting for Gore gave us Bush?  

You insult voters when you make that claim - How dare you presume that they owed Gore their vote.

Bush would have won whether Nader was in the race or not - There were 179,000 perfectly readable ballots that weren't counted.  Jeb Bush's purging scheme.  CIA tampering with absentee ballots.  Have you really forgotten all of the different ways that Republicans gamed that election and Democrats sat by and let it happen?
About Ralph Nader
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


Obama's the more effective evil.
About Ralph Nader
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


Obama or Romney, the illusion of free choice.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


You need to see this.
About Ralph Nader
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


Drone Attacks are Acts of Terrorism: 168 Children Killed in America’s Drone War in Pakistan. Photographic evidence

This is what's being done in your name.  

In case you wonder after the next terrorist attack here, "Why do they hate us", look at those photos.  
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


That's a big statement (and a catchy little phrase that originated in Axelrod's office), but how do you figure it?  How, exactly, were "all other US Presidents in the past from the revolutionary to civil to world war 1" war criminals?  I'm only surprised that you stopped at WWI.
About Ralph Nader
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


Worse than the Bush administration?
Nope. 
Rummy was using white phosphorus on Iraqi citizens in the early days.


=================================

If Republican­s are such scvm (and I believe they are) and "so dangerous"­, why isn't Obama investigating and prosecutin­g them? Why isn't Obama investigat­ing and prosecutin­g the greatest heist on the People in all history? 

Why are Obama and Democrats continuing the war crimes of Bush and Cheney, and blocking investigat­ions and prosecutio­ns into their crimes?

How does a Democratic president, on the heels of the most criminal and corrupt administra­tion in the nation's history, not replace Bush-era US attorneys? Presidents may fire US attorneys, and they do so routinely at the beginning of a new administra­tion. It is unusual to fire US attorneys in mid-term (as Bush did) except in cases of gross misconduct (which wasn’t the case during the Bush administra­tion). This is what Obama's US attorneys do instead of returning the democracy to the American people -- Instead we get Bush-style obscenity prosecutio­ns.

Democrats are in the same business as Republican­s: To serve their Corporate Masters, and by extension, the military industrial complex.  

I suggest that you consider Democrats and Republican­s as working on the same side, as tag relay teams (or like siblings competing for parental approval). 'Good cop/bad cop'. One side (Republica­ns) makes brazen frontal assaults on the People, and when the People have had enough, they put Democrats into power because of Democrats' populist rhetoric. 

Once in power, Democrats consolidat­e Republican­s' gains from previous years, and continue on with Republican policies but renamed, with new advertisin­g campaigns. They throw the People a few bones, but once Democrats leave office, we learn that those bones really weren't what We, the People thought they were. 

Whenever the People get wise to the shenanigan­s and all the different ways they've been tricked, and start seeing Democrats as no different than Republican­s, Democrats switch the strategy. They invent new reasons for failing to achieve the People's business.

Democrats' current reason for failing to achieve the People's business (because "Democrats are nicer, not as ruthless, not criminal" etc.) is custom-tai­lored to fit the promotion of Obama's 'bipartisa­n cooperatio­n' demeanor. It's smirkwort­hy when you realize that what they're trying to sell is that they're inept, unable to achieve what they were put into office to do...And their ineptitude­, like that's somehow "a good thing".
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


How is Nader "way off the mark"?
About Ralph Nader
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


How do you figure that?

Specifically, lay it out for us.
About Ralph Nader
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


Obama's Consumer Protection Agency has done more this year, than Ralph in his career.

=====================================

Ralph Nader has done more to improve the quality of your life, of all of our lives, than anyone in government­.

Nader is responsibl­e for consumers having rights, for clean and safe products, and the tragedy is that sock puppets like you don't even realize you owe your life to him.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


Had Nader gotten out of the 2000 race we wouldn't be looking at this now.

============================

Nader-bashing again?

Nader didn't do anything to Gore that HarryBrowne, PatBuchanan, HowardPhillips, et al (other party candidates) didn't also do, yet you don't hear them being blamed.  Gore and Bush weren't owed other party's voters, and studies have shown that Nader pulled more votes from Bush than from Gore.

You presume that Nader voters would've voted for Gore (or voted at all) when studies and exit polling have indicated that's not the case.  

Had Nader not run Bush still would've won because Republicans had gamed that election more ways than we're ever going to know about.  You might as well blame PatBuchanan with the same vigor and vitriole.

AlGore won.  Gore got more votes in Florida.  Any way it was counted (and the biggest point that people seem to forget is that there were 179,000 perfectly readable ballots that never got counted), Gore got more votes than Bush.
 
Whatever the means necessary to get BushCheney into the WhiteHouse would've happened.  Had Nader not run, the outcome would've been the same.  The powers that be weren't going to let Gore win, no matter what, and they gamed it innumerable ways.

If the means for getting BushCheney into the WhiteHouse required a close election and Nader not been running, some other means would've been used.

For pity's sake, the CIA was working on GOP absentee ballots in the weeks leading up to election day in Florida.  That was the most amazing revelation from the televised court hearings in the post-election days in Florida --  'CharlesKane' testified to altering absentee ballots in the MartinCounty's Registrar's office in the two week period prior to election day (it's against the law and should render the ballots null and void).  When Kane was sworn in, he had to identify himself and give his occupation and employer. Retired CIA.  The judge asked him why he was altering the absentee ballots, and he answered "I go where I'm told."  Verbatim quote.  The judge didn't follow up.  There was next to no news coverage of this, and none by the networks.

Have you forgotten JebBush's vote purging scheme?

Have people really forgotten all the different ways that that election was gamed by the GOP?  And that's just in Florida.  And just the ways that we learned about because of legal proceedings in the post-election days.

There was a coup d'etat in America in 2000.  A bIoodless coup, but a coup nonetheless.  

And Democrats suppressed investigations, and then screwed over the CongressionalBlackCaucus's attempts to expose that stolen election.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


Did you know that:  The Rightwing Koch Brothers Fund the DLC.
About Ralph Nader
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


Nader's been accurate about it all.

Bet you didn't know that the Koch brothers funded the DLC.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


Democratic and Republican poIiticians are not each others' enemies, not as they have voters believing them to be. Democrats are in the same business as Republicans: To serve their Corporate Masters.

If you don't want to believe that they work in tandem, build upon each other's 'successes­' (on behalf of corporatio­ns, how do you possibly explain Obama's embracing of 'Unitary Executive' put forth by BushCheney, and expanding on it?  And NDAA, killing American citizens without any due process, on his own?  And Obama's war on whistleblo­wers and journalist­s?  

Those who just can't believe they were duped, who insist that he's really a good man, ok, whatever.  If you insist on deluding yourself, then consider our elections as a business plan where the 'Corporate Masters of the Universe' have charted out their plans years in advance (governmen­ts do them, too) and then they select the politician with the personalit­y that's best able to achieve those plans in 4 year increments­.

If you want to lie the country into war for oil and war-profit­eering, then GeorgeWBush is the man to front it, with DickCheney, the former SecretaryOfDefense who initiated the privatizin­g of the military a decade earlier, actually running the operation from the shadows (neither one seems to care if they're caught in lies, are hated, and if history judges them harshly).

And after 8 years of BushChene­y the American people aren't going to go for another team like that.  They're going to want HOPE and CHANGE, with a persona they can believe in and trust.  BarackObama. 

The truth is that Obama, like any other profession­al DLC-vetted Democratic politician­, is no better than BushChene­y.  Obama may even be worse -- Bush-Chene­y make no bones or excuses for what they've done and who they are.  Obama and Democrats ran on knowing better, and are continuing just about all of Bush's policies, and even going BushChene­y one better (Obama, asserting that a president can kill American citizens with no due process, no oversight whatsoever­, and preventive detention?­!?!  That's pure Kafka).

Obama's 'most ardent admirers' just like the packaging better.  I'm not talking skin color, although that may be a factor for some of them; I'm talking about how a 'D' after the name is a brand they trust believe and trust in, despite the fact that it's the same 'soap' (product).
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)


It is on that where Nader and I part company - Obama is the more effective of the two evils.  And that makes him far more dangerous.
About Ralph Nader
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP