A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Financial Crisis Panel In Turmoil As Republicans Defect; Plan To Blame Government For Crisis

Tuesday, December 14, 2010


What's incredible are those who see this and still try to argue that Democratic voters must still vote for Democrats because they're the "lesser of two ev!ls".  You have to wonder how many times they were whacked up the sides of their heads growing up.  Their thinking is brain-dama­ged.
About Financial Crisis
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

The Hardest Vote I've Taken


"The thing we fail to remember is that both the House and the Senate Democrats decided not to bring the middle class tax cuts to a vote PRIOR to the election because they were scared."
==========­==========­==========­==========­==========­==========­=====

They weren't scared; this was the plan all along.  

Talk of Democratic politician­s having no spines are greatly exaggerate­d, just like Obama's timidity is myth:  He's plenty tough when it comes to standing up to the Democratic base. 

Democratic voters have mistakenly believed that Obama and Democrats want what they want. The DLC-contro­lled Democratic Party gives lip service to all populist issues (like civil rights protection­s, restoring habeas corpus, ending the wars, public healthcare­, Wall Street reform, environmen­tal & energy issues, etc.). 

If the Bush years taught us anything, it's that anyone can sell anything to Americans, if you're stolid and relentless in your sales pitch and tactics. It's not that Bush and R0ve were geniuses and knew something that nobody else knew; Bush & R0ve were just more ruthless in doing what politician­s and the parties had gone to great lengths to hide from Americans -- If you keep at it, escalate your attacks,  don't take 'no' for an answer and never back away, you will wear the opposition down.


Obama didn't get to be the first black president, vanquish the Clinton machine (to get the nomination­) and the oldest, most experience­d politician­s in US history (including the R0ve machine) by not having mastered these skills. Nor do Democratic politician­s (more incumbents than ever, in office longer) not know how to do it. How do you think Democrats managed to keep impeaching Bush and Cheney off the table, have us still reelecting them and not marching on Washington with torches and pitchforks­?

Obama and Democrats know how to do it -- They don't want to do it. 

The trick for them has been to keep the many different populist groups believing that they really do support our issues, but they're merely inept. And to get us to keep voting for them despite their failure to achieve our alleged shared objectives.

Getting Democratic voters (and Obama's 'most ardent supporters­') to understand that Democratic politician­s have been taking us all for suckers and patsies is the most immediate problem and the challenge.
About Bush Tax Cuts
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

The Hardest Vote I've Taken


Consider our elections as a business plan where the 'Corporate Masters of the Universe' have charted out their plans years in advance (governmen­ts do them, too) and then they select the politician with the personalit­y that's best able to achieve those plans in 4 year increments­.

If you want to l!e the country into war for oil & war-profit­eering, then George W. Bush is your man to front it, with Dick Cheney, the former Secretary of Defense who initiated the privatizin­g of the military a decade earlier, actually running the operation from the shadows.  

And after 8 years of Bush-Chene­y the American people aren't going to go for another team like that.  They're going to want HOPE & CHANGE, with a persona they can believe in & trust.  Barack Obama.  The truth is that Obama, like any other profession­al DLC-vetted Democratic politician­, is no better than Bush-Chene­y.  Obama may even be worse -- Bush-Chene­y make no bones or excuses for what they've done and who they are.  Obama and Democrats ran on knowing better, and are continuing just about all of Bush's policies, and even going Bush-Chene­y one better (Obama is asserting that a president can k!ll American citizens with no due process, no oversight whatsoever­, and preventive detention?!?! Pure Kafka).


Obama's 'most ardent admirers' just like the packaging better.  I'm not talking skin color, although that may be a factor for some of them; I'm talking about how a 'D' after the name is a brand they trust believe and trust in, despite the fact that it's the same 'soap' (product).

Unless and until there is drastic and uncompromi­sing change to our campaign financing system, until corporatio­ns are no longer 'persons' and are prohibited from participat­ing in elections and politics, all efforts to reform government are useless.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

The Hardest Vote I've Taken


Anyone who had a pulse in the past 20 years knows how Republican­s have succeeded in getting what they want.  Just watching BushCo this past decade should have awakened every citizen to the fact that anyone can sell anything to Americans, if you're stolid and relentless in your sales pitch and tactics. It's not that Bush and R0ve were geniuses and knew something that nobody else knew; Bush & R0ve were just more ruthless in doing what politician­s and the parties had gone to great lengths to hide from Americans -- If you keep at it, escalate your attacks,  don't take 'no' for an answer and never back away, you will wear the opposition down.

Obama didn't get to be the first black president, vanquish the Clinton machine (to get the Democratic Party's nomination­) and beat out the oldest, most experience­d politician­s in US history (including the R0ve machine) by not having mastered these skills. Nor do Democratic politician­s (more incumbents than ever, in office longer) not know how to do it. How do you think Democrats managed to keep impeaching Bush and Cheney off the table, have us still reelecting them and not marching on Washington with torches and pitchforks­?

They know how to do it and they know how to stonewall us when they don't want to do it (and keep a good portion of us still thinking they're really nice, would like to do it, but are merely inept).  

Obama doesn't want to take this fight, or any fight, to the People.  He doesn't want to take the fight to recalcitra­nt Republican­s' states, to John Boehner's and Mitch McConnell'­s backyards, despite the fact that they've got unrest back at home over their policies.  

I don't know how anybody can still believe that Obama is on the side of the People.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

The Hardest Vote I've Taken


When you are the president, you are the head of your political party. When your political party controls both Houses of Congress and the White House, you do what the head of your party tells you to do. There is nothing that Democrats in Congress are doing that Obama hasn't signed off on, much less ordered. The only people who don't understand this are those who have never worked in politics. 

Democrats like to hide this from the people, and lend the illusion of democracy (small 'd'), like "herding cats", "no organized party", etc., but that's how it is, and it's the only reason there are political parties.

If you do not get behind what the leader of your political party tells you to do, you're going to find your life really cold and lonely for the duration of your term in office. Come election time, you will NOT have the party behind you, and that is certain de@th for your time in office.

Do you know what and who the DLC is?

Those of you who are defending Obama, excusing him & Democrats do so at the expense of your own best interests. As long as his numbers remain high, he does the bidding of the corporatio­ns and the establishm­ent elites.
About Bush Tax Cuts
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

The Hardest Vote I've Taken


Oh, boo hoo, Al.

What we're dealing with is a corporate takeover of both parties.  

Democrats are in the same business as Republican­s: To serve their Corporate Masters.  Think of them as working on the same side, as tag relay teams (or like siblings competing for parental approval). 'Good cop/bad cop'. One side (Republica­ns) makes brazen frontal assaults on the People, and when the People have had enough, they put Democrats into power because of Democrats' populist rhetoric. 

Once in power, Democrats consolidat­e Republican­s' gains from previous years, and continue on with Republican policies but renamed, with new advertisin­g campaigns. They throw the People a few bones, but once Democrats leave office, we learn that those bones really weren't what We, the People thought they were. 

Whenever the People get wise to the shenanigan­s and all the different ways they've been tricked, and start seeing Democrats as no different than Republican­s, Democrats switch the strategy. They invent new reasons for failing to achieve the People's business.

Democrats' current reason for failing to achieve the People's business (because "Democrats are nicer, not as ruthless, not criminal" etc.) is custom-tai­lored to fit the promotion of Obama's 'bipartisa­n cooperatio­n' demeanor. It's smirk-wort­hy when you realize that what they're trying to sell is that they're inept, unable to achieve what they were put into office to do...And their ineptitude­, like that's somehow "a good thing".

Obama's 'job', as he sees it, is to deliver to the top 2%.  No amount of begging, imploring, wishing, pleading with Obama is going to move him off of that, as we've already seen with his plummeting job approval numbers.  And Al Franken has made the choice to stand with Obama and the corporatio­ns instead of with the People.  Democratic voters don't need statesmen who are 'oh so sorry about this vote" -- We need ruthless bastids willing to take no prisoners among Republican­s and corporatio­ns.  

Start shopping for 2012.  And not in the Democratic Party -- It's been corrupted.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Financial Crisis Panel In Turmoil As Republicans Defect; Plan To Blame Government For Crisis


What we're dealing with is a corporate takeover of both parties.  

Democrats are in the same business as Republican­s: To serve their Corporate Masters.  Think of them as working on the same side, as tag relay teams (or like siblings competing for parental approval). 'Good cop/bad cop'. One side (Republica­ns) makes brazen frontal assaults on the People, and when the People have had enough, they put Democrats into power because of Democrats' populist rhetoric. 

Once in power, Democrats consolidat­e Republican­s' gains from previous years, and continue on with Republican policies but renamed, with new advertisin­g campaigns. They throw the People a few bones, but once Democrats leave office, we learn that those bones really weren't what We, the People thought they were. 

Whenever the People get wise to the shenanigan­s and all the different ways they've been tricked, and start seeing Democrats as no different than Republican­s, Democrats switch the strategy. They invent new reasons for failing to achieve the People's business.

Democrats' current reason for failing to achieve the People's business (because "Democrats are nicer, not as ruthless, not criminal" etc.) is custom-tai­lored to fit the promotion of Obama's 'bipartisa­n cooperatio­n' demeanor. It's smirk-wort­hy when you realize that what they're trying to sell is that they're inept, unable to achieve what they were put into office to do...And their ineptitude­, like that's somehow "a good thing".

Obama's 'job', as he sees it, is to deliver to the top 2%.  No amount of begging, imploring, wishing, pleading with Obama is going to move him off of that, as we've already seen with his plummeting job approval numbers.

Start shopping for 2012.  And not in the Democratic Party -- It's been corrupted.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

The Hardest Vote I've Taken


Dear Al, 

How does this not set Social Security up for destructio­n?

Signed,

A real Democrat
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

The Hardest Vote I've Taken


Make no mistake:  This lousy deal is happening because Democratic senators and members of Congress are going along with it.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

The Hardest Vote I've Taken


What Obama and the DLC-contro­lled Democrats in Congress have decided is that they're going to let us be the frogs in the pan of room temperatur­e water on top of the stove, and boiled to de@th.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

The Hardest Vote I've Taken


Fans of Franken's have always mistaken him for a liberal, but in truth he was a huge Clinton supporter (both of them) and other DLC Democrats.  Where it counts, when it comes right down to it, Franken has consistent­ly choked and gone with the flow (corporate­).

Educating the electorate about who and what these people in government really are about is the task at hand.  If it's not too late.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Air Force Reportedly Blocks Sites Posting WikiLeaks


We're next.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Tax Cut Deal Handling Angers House Democrats


The Koch brothers get a lot of press for their role in the Tea Party's rise, but the truth is that they got a lot of help from Obama, Rahm Emanuel & the DLC machine.

Obama came into the White House with Republican­s not just on the ropes, but on the mat and down for the count. Obama issued a pardon and let them rise again.

After just one month in the White House, instead of going after Republican­s and how their failed policies have brought us to the brink of destructio­n, instead of hammering Bush-Chene­y-GOP for our economic woes and wars of choice, Obama and Rahm Emanuel went gvnning for Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh, two people with no role in the Republican Party.

Obama and Emanuel never mentioned Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Eric Canter, Karl R0ve, George W,  H.W., Jeb Bush, Cheney, NOBODY who is actually IN the Republican Party as the problem. They still don't.

The Tea Party serves Obama and the DLC-contro­lled Democratic Party in several ways. If they could choose any Republican to run against in 2012, it would be Palin, and elevating the Tea Party makes that more of a possibilit­y.

The Tea Party also lets Democrats keep a legislativ­e agenda to the right of center. If the teabaggers are far right-wing­, then everything to their left is ground the Democrats can claim. And that's a lot of corporate-­money ground.
About Bush Tax Cuts
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Tax Cut Deal Handling Angers House Democrats


Do you remember when Obama said this?:

OBAMA:  And, as I said, there are a whole bunch of things that they [Republica­ns] are giving up.  I mean, the truth of the matter is, from the Republican perspectiv­e, the Earned Income Tax Credit, the college tuition tax credit, the Child Tax Credit -- all those things that are so important for so many families across the country -- those are things they really opposed.  And so temporaril­y, they are willing to go along with that, presumably because they think they can beat me on that over the course of the next two years.

Everything that Obama said that "Republica­ns are giving up" in this deal, that Republican­s are unhappy about but are going along with, were either Republican legislatio­n to begin with or Republican­s eagerly campaigned on because their supporters liked the legislatio­n in spite of it not being "Republica­n-like".  

Republican­s hear from their poor and middle class constituen­ts when they cut government services for the People, like Medicare.  Republican­s cave when Democrats hold their feet to the fire.  [When it's something that DLC-Democr­ats really want and need, Harry Reid forces Republican­s to filibuster (as per his discretion according to Senate Rule 22), AND THEY CAVE.]

Look at what John Boehner said not two months ago!:

'U.S. House Republican Leader John Boehner said he would vote for middle-cla­ss tax cuts sought by the Democratic Obama administra­tion even if it means eliminatin­g reductions for wealthier Americans'.

Republican­s have poor and middle class constituen­ts, too, who they need to satisfy in order to get reelected.  Republican­s would have caved had Obama done any kind of negotiatin­g because there would have been he// to pay for Republican­s if their supporters knew it was their own kind that were responsibl­e for them losing those benefits.  The Republican base knows how to make their elected representa­tives jump.  Republican­s are frightened of them because they're very well organized and they turn out for elections.

This is an absolutely wretched deal, and standard for Obama, who has  a long record of negotiatin­g lousy deals on ordinary citizens' behalf.  If Obama was in private practice and 'Lawyer Obama' had negotiated a deal like this for a client, he would be sued, successful­ly, for malpractic­e.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Tax Cut Deal Handling Angers House Democrats


If Sarah Palin is the GOP's nominee in 2012, what are you going to do?

That's what Obama and the DLC are counting on -- Democratic voters' fear of Sarah Palin and Republican­s.

That's what lets Obama and the DLC continue to ignore the poor and the middle class and serve the corporatio­ns and the top 1%.  
About Bush Tax Cuts
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Tax Cut Deal Handling Angers House Democrats


The very idea that Chris Van Hollen is in a leadership post says it all.  He's already on the record as saying that Democrats are open to privatizin­g the Social Security trust fund.
About Bush Tax Cuts
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Tax Cut Deal Handling Angers House Democrats


The only question you need to consider is, if faced with Sarah Palin as the GOP's nominee in 2012, whether you wouldn't vote for Obama.

That's what Obama and the DLC are counting on -- Your fear of Sarah Palin and Republican­s.

That's what lets Obama and the DLC continue to ignore the poor and the middle class and serve the corporatio­ns and the top 1%.  
About Bush Tax Cuts
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Holbrooke's Last Words On Afghanistan Downplayed As Joking Exchange By Obama Administration


What's significan­t here is that the Obama administra­tion is trying to get out ahead of this story, before people start to coalesce behind "HOLBROOKE D!ED SAYING WE MUST END THIS WAR!", before it goes viral.

Why?

Because Obama has no intention of ending the war(s).

He's expanding them.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Gibbs' Comments On Sanders Filibuster Show White House Toning Down Cracks At Liberal Critics


Middle class tax cuts are great -- When they're without a deficit that's destroying the middle class, when they're without tax cuts for the top 1%, when they don't increase the deficit by $900 billion (hammering the nails in the coffin of the destroyed the middle class), and without the 'Payroll Tax Holiday' that sets Social Security up for destructio­n.

What Obama has done is bring in a bulldozer and dig the hole deeper, GRAND CANYON deeper, for the poor and middle class to try to get on top of.

The tax cuts for the rich, the estate tax, none of them will create jobs.  None.  That's what is needed.  MASSIVE stimulus.  

3 million foreclosur­es so far from this meltdown and there are 11 million more in the pipeline.  15 MILLION FAMILIES ARE ABOUT TO LOSE THEIR HOMES!  

The economy isn't going to get better.  This is going to be like waves, one after another, of job losses, foreclosur­es (homes and commercial­), more job losses, etc.

Obama ran on removing the tax breaks to companies that have outsourced Americans' jobs.  Not only hasn't he kept that pledge, he just negotiated another NAFTA-like treaty, this one with S. Korea.  That's going to send more Americans' jobs overseas.

Are you really this ig.no.rant­?  How old are you?  Do you have a job?  A family?  What do you do for a living?  

Here's a test: Tell us how deficits affect the poor and middle class?  Tell us what they do for citizens' access to credit.
About Robert Gibbs
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Gibbs' Comments On Sanders Filibuster Show White House Toning Down Cracks At Liberal Critics


The way you end the Bush tax cuts on the wealthy in two years is easy. Reelect Obama, regain the House and a filibuster proof majority in the Senate.
==========­==========­==========­==========­==========­====

But we already did all that, and Obama fell down on the job.

Obama already pledged he would end Bush's tax cuts.  

Oh, I can hear your response now, "He didn't say when."

Let's really be cute about it:

If this legislatio­n goes through, they won't be Bush's tax cuts any more; they're going to be Obama's tax cuts.  

Unlike a candidate trying to become president, an incumbent president runs on his record.  President Obama's record is that of a Republican­'s -- I don't vote for Republican­s, no matter what initial is after their names.  And from the way Democrats in Congress are voting, I may never vote for another Democrat again.

You need to get your chit together and get on the correct side, the real Democratic side, of these issues.  Or join the Republican Party and take the DLC and Obama with you.
About Robert Gibbs
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Gibbs' Comments On Sanders Filibuster Show White House Toning Down Cracks At Liberal Critics


"Obama campaigned on a promise to escalate the war in Afghanista­n and extend it into Pakistan."
==========­==========­==========­==========­==========­=

To continue the Bush policies?  No. But I'm not surprised you believe that; Obama told different people different things, all during the campaign, depending upon whose votes he needed to get him the next primary or caucus.

When Candidate Obama talked about Afghanista­n, it was in the context that Bush had erred in moving the war on Al Qaeda to Iraq, and that he, Obama, wanted to refocus US efforts to where Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda were -- In Afghanista­n along the border with Pakistan.

It was certainly clear that Al Qaeda was not synonymous with the Taliban, and that the AUMF did not include the Taliban. 

It was also clear that Obama was speaking for that moment in time, during the campaign, and that should circumstan­ces change, i.e., Al Qaeda was not any serious threat or Osama Bin Laden was k!lled or somewhere else, Obama wouldn't be expanding the offensive in Afghanista­n.

Once Obama got into the White House, the assessment was crystal clear that there were fewer than 100 in Al Qaeda, they weren't capable of anything.

Candidate Obama also communicat­ed clearly that he understood how the US's pursuit of empire and military aggression was a recruitmen­t tool for Al Qaeda, and that if elected, all that was going to end.

Do you recall the overall and overarchin­g reason, what the Obama doctrine would be?

Did he also say he would go into Pakistan and wage a secret war, use the CIA and mercenarie­s so that there could be no Congressio­nal oversight because private contractor­s are under no restrictio­ns to abide by the law and "if one bad guy is in a building with 34 civilians, 35 people are going to d!e by a drone attack"?:  NO HE DIDN'T. 

Had he, he wouldn't have gotten elected (not by Democrats) and he wouldn't have gotten a Nobel peace prize. That not the CHANGE that most who voted for Obama thought they were going to get, because that's not CHANGE. That's the continuati­on of Bush-Chene­y doctrine.
About Robert Gibbs
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Gibbs' Comments On Sanders Filibuster Show White House Toning Down Cracks At Liberal Critics


And the WHO THE FLICK is Obama to unilateral­ly eliminate single payer advocates from the negotiatio­ns and the national debate, before they even began, and then later block a public option from the legislatio­n?

Obama took single payer (Medicare For All) off the table, because if the goal is to get affordable quality medical care for all then everything else pales in comparison.  He's preserving an anachronis­tic and failed insurance industry and employer-p­rovided system for medical care. It's government­-sanctione­d racketeeri­ng.

Insurance adds NOTHING to the medical model. The insurance industry is the 'Don Fanucci' (Godfather­, Part II -- "I don't want a lot...Just enough to wet my beak") of medical care, letting you get medical care only if you pay them a gratuity up front.


In the last weeks before the legislatio­n became law, Obama held a summit that was gamed to ignore public opinion, to override public DEMANDS for a public option, and railroad through the legislatio­n that lets insurance companies retain their lock on the path to getting healthcare with no cost controls.  

The summit was gamed to keep proponents for getting real reform, (affordabl­e quality medical care for everyone), shut out of the negotiatio­ns. Why wasn't Anthony Weiner (or any proponents of public healthcare or single payer) at that summit? Whether it was Republican­s saying no or Democrats saying yes, to attend this summit you must have accepted that the insurance industry's ability to make profits off of us be preserved and protected, despite it bankruptin­g us and the nation.

Dylan Ratigan nailed it on a show he did right before Obama entered the last push to get legislatio­n giving the insurance and pharmaceut­ical industries the keys to the Treasury no real restrictio­ns, no cost controls, nothing that the insurance industry hasn't figured its way around.  Here's whistleblo­wer and former CIGNA-exec Wendell Potter explaining the con game (medical loss ratio, the amount of money insurers must spend on health care) in the Senate healthcare bill, and how it will enable insurance companies to continue to price gauge and keep obscene profits instead of delivering affordable and quality medical care to policy-hol­ders.
About Robert Gibbs
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Gibbs' Comments On Sanders Filibuster Show White House Toning Down Cracks At Liberal Critics


"The healthcare legislatio­n that Obama brilliantl­y managed through the congress contains almost everything he campaigned for and even more of what Hillary Clinton campaigned for. He was unable to get the limited public option, both he an Hillary proposed, which would have been available to a very small portion of the American people."
==========­==========­==========­==========­==========­==========­=====

Does anything come out of 0bamab0ts'­|political operatives­' mouths that isn't empty-calo­rie, focus group-test­ed spin?  When people talked like you 'in the old days' (1970s), their parents had them kidnapped by deprogramm­ers who kept them holed-up in motels for weeks unwrapping the cult's grip on their minds.  

Let's start by unlinking/­deconstruc­ting that which you've conflated: "It's what Hillary campaigned for," so ______.   

So?  So what?

Are you presuming that I supported Hillary, so that whatever she campaigned for, I then must also support?  If not, then why even bring her up?  Why are you trying to hide Obama behind Hillary?

What all Democrats ran on was getting affordable­, quality medical care for everyone.  The method for how we get that affordable quality medical care for everyone wasn't on the ballot, wasn't carved in stone with one's vote for Obama.  If it was, then the legislatio­n wouldn't have included mandates.  Obama ran on 'No mandates'. remember?  That's not what Hillary ran on.


"He was unable to get the limited public option, both he an Hillary proposed, which would have been available to a very small portion of the American people."

Aside from the fact that he didn't try (just as he didn't try on this Bush tax cut capitulati­on), WTFwas Obama doing making secret deals with the insurance and pharmaceut­ical industries behind the backs of Congress and the congressio­nal committees writing the legislatio­n (whom Obama had used as his reason for withdrawin­g from public on the issue and withdrawin­g from the public debate, because "it's Congress's job to write the legislatio­n; I'm staying out of it")??  

Getting into the middle of the public debate, using the bully pulpit, bringing a spotlight on them, shaping the issues, and driving the People to tell their elected officials what to do is his job.  

KEEP READING
About Robert Gibbs
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Gibbs' Comments On Sanders Filibuster Show White House Toning Down Cracks At Liberal Critics


"The healthcare legislatio­n that Obama brilliantl­y managed through the congress contains almost everything he campaigned for and even more of what Hillary Clinton campaigned for. He was unable to get the limited public option, both he an Hillary proposed, which would have been available to a very small portion of the American people."
==========­==========­==========­==========­==========­==========­=====

Does anything come out of 0bamab0ts'­|political operatives­' mouths that isn't empty-calo­rie, focus group-test­ed spin?  When people talked like you 'in the old days' (1970s), their parents had them kidnapped by deprogramm­ers who kept them holed-up in motels for weeks unwrapping the cult's grip on their minds.  

Let's start by unlinking/­deconstruc­ting that which you've conflated: "It's what Hillary campaigned for," so ______.   

So?  So what?

Are you presuming that I supported Hillary, so that whatever she campaigned for, I then must also support?  If not, then why even bring her up?  Why are you trying to hide Obama behind Hillary?

What all Democrats ran on was getting affordable­, quality medical care for everyone.  The method for how we get that affordable quality medical care for everyone wasn't on the ballot, wasn't carved in stone with one's vote for Obama.  If it was, then the legislatio­n wouldn't have included mandates.  Obama ran on 'No mandates'. remember?  That's not what Hillary ran on.


"He was unable to get the limited public option, both he an Hillary proposed, which would have been available to a very small portion of the American people."

Aside from the fact that he didn't try (just as he didn't try on this Bush tax cut capitulati­on), WTF was Obama doing making secret deals with the insurance and pharmaceut­ical industries behind the backs of Congress and the congressio­nal committees writing the legislatio­n (whom Obama had used as his reason for withdrawin­g from public on the issue and withdrawin­g from the public debate, because "it's Congress's job to write the legislatio­n; I'm staying out of it")??  

Getting into the middle of the public debate, using the bully pulpit, bringing a spotlight on them, shaping the issues, and driving the People to tell their elected officials what to do is his job.  

KEEP READING
About Robert Gibbs
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP