Harry Reid Open To Gun Control Debate After Sandy Hook Shooting
Monday, December 17, 2012
"Harry Reid, Pro Gun Democrat"
Lol.
=================
Neither party is for gun control.
I wrote this after Gabrielle Giffords was shot in Tucson:
The Democratic Party has been courting the gun lobby.
Gabrielle Giffords is not for gun control. The weapon used on her was purchased legally. The weapon was one that had been banned during the 1990s, but that law expired in 2004 and Giffords supported ending the ban. She supports gun rights, opposed the Washington D.C. gun ban, and signed an amicus brief with the U.S. SupremeCourt in support of overturning the ban.
The roll call vote in the Senate on the (Dianne) Feinstein amendment to extend the ban, March 2, 2004. Russ Feingold lovers, note his "nay" vote, as well as other Democrats still serving, like Harry Reid, Mary Landrieu, Tim Johnson (not voting), Ben Nelson, Max Baucus.
In 2007, Representative Carolyn Maloney's bill to reinstate the ban with 67 co-sponsors (Giffords was not among them), went nowhere.
HR 6257 (a bill to reinstate the ban on assault weapons, as well as to expand the list of banned weapons, for ten years) was introduced in June 2008, and then got buried in a House subcommittee one month later, where it d!ed at the end of that Congress (2008).
After Obama and Democrats won the 2008 elections and took control of the White House and Congress, Dianne Feinstein said in April 2009 about introducing legislation in the Senate to reinstate the Assault Weapons Ban, "I wouldn't bring it up now."
Obama has stated that he wouldn't push for the reinstatement of the Assault Weapons Ban. He supports ratifying CIFTA, an inter-American treaty to curb international small arms trafficking.
Neither Republicans nor Democrats are willing to take on the gun lobby (or any corporate industry), nor spend the money on the prevention side (funding for mental health treatment, public education and social safety nets, etc.).
So across America, the fight (and gridlock) continues.
If I had to bet right now, I'd say what is going to come out of this are more draconian laws to ban speech and privacy rights (all of said legislation will be used for drug crimes and political groups working to unseat the entrenched corporate power, and not crimes of "terror"). All because it happened to "their own" (Giffords, Judge John Roll and Giffords aide Gabriel Zimmerman).
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost Read more...
