A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Republican Debate: GOP Candidates Go Head-To-Head Ahead Of Florida Primary (LIVE UPDATES)

Thursday, January 26, 2012


Bill Clinton Calls Gingrich Out: 'GINGRICH OPPOSED BILL THAT LED TO BALANCED BUDGETS'
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Alan Greenspan: Don't Blame Capitalism For All This Income Inequality


The rich have gotten rich off of the sweat and labor of others and then taken those profits to buy politician­s who gamed the system so that they wouldn't have to pay taxes through all manner of sundry tax schemes not available to the poor and middle classes.  The rich also 'closed the door' on the ways that initially enabled them to amass their 'seed money' for creating their businesses­.  

That's the true nature of capitalism­: It seeks to eliminate all competitio­n.

Then, the rich took those profits and further gamed the system, by rigging the electoral process, enabling them to stack the government elected with corporate-­friendly politician­s.  Business interests over the People's interests.  

Over the course of US history, corporatio­ns have managed to game our political system, and done it so effectivel­y that the two-party system competes to serve corporate interests while defending that service as, "What's good for GM (corporati­ons) is good for America (We the People)". 

Democrats (controlle­d by the DLC, and that's important to remember) and Republican­s are corporate tools.  Like siblings competing for the attention and approval (campaign contributi­ons) of a parent, Republican­s and DLC-contro­lled Democrats try to outdo each other in delivering for their real constituen­t, transnatio­nal corporatio­ns.  The trick for them has been to make it seem as if they were really working on behalf of WeThePeopl­e. 

Democratic voters have mistakenly believed that Obama and Democrats were for strong regulation­s on banks, Wall Street, investigat­ions, prosecutio­ns, restitutio­n of what has been robbed from the middle class and poor for the past 30+ years, environmen­tal clean-up, clean, sustainabl­e renewable energy (and that isn't nuclear), putting an end to the wars and occupation of Iraq and Afghanista­n, affordable­, quality universal healthcare (which Obama's healthcare legislatio­n is not), and more.

The DLC-contro­lled Democratic Party gives lip service to these and all populist issues, because like the Republican Party, the DLC works for the benefit of transnatio­nal corporatio­ns.

I am an old, OLD liberal Democrat.  An FDR Democrat.  I've never voted for a Republican in my many years of voting nor will I.  I will NEVER vote for any candidate who isn't talking about economic justice and actively working for it, making it his first priority in all that he does, whether it's in reproducti­ve rights, human rights, civil rights, gay rights, ending the wars now, prosecutin­g war criminals and banksters.  As it stands now, I can't see voting for any Democrat again.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mitt Romney's Money: Candidate Will Amend Financial Disclosures Released In August


The returns Romney made public this week represent the years 2010 and 2011, and raise more questions than they answer. 

His 2010 return indicates he paid a rate of 13.9 percent, and suggests he paid far lower than that in 2009. The 2010 return reveals he carried over $4.9 million in capital losses from the previous year. That means he paid no taxes on any capital gains in 2009, including no taxes on his carried interest. So how much did he pay in 2009? Zero? How close to zero?


Or how about 2008, the year when the investment market first crashed? 

Romney's 2010 return also lists a Swiss bank account. Romney's trust adviser said the account existed "for diversific­ation purposes only". His return indicates he paid US taxes on the interest in that Swiss account, and that he closed the Swiss account in 2010. That’s all fine, but how long did he have the Swiss account to begin with?  Was he betting against US currency? 

We would know the answers to those questions if Romney released his earlier returns. 

When Romney last ran for president four years ago, he said he was in the process of divesting or removing all of his holdings in Iran and all investment­s related to stem cell research. However, his charitable trust indicates he continued to buy and sell these holdings. Did Romney break his word about his divestment promises? Only his 2007 return can answer that.

How much did Romney make and what tax rate did he pay from 1984 to 2009? In this period, he was a corporate buyout specialist at Bain, and he then continued to receive a share of the Bain profits as part of a non-compet­e agreement.  Only his returns from this period will show how much he made and what his rate was. 

Furthermor­e, they will also show how much he profited from deals that led to bankruptci­es.  Specifical­ly, KB Toys and Dade Behring.  His firm got millions of dollars in dividends when he acquired those companies, then Bain sent KB and Dade Behring into bankruptcy­, prompting thousands of US workers to lose their jobs.  How much did he profit in those deals?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Disclose Act: Super PAC Transparency Legislation To Be Introduced By House Democrats


It is STILL a step forward!

==========­==========

A step forward, in the same direction, of corporate money controllin­g elections.  Both parties.  Nobody else can afford to get into the game (high priced public relations firms and ad agencies, Frank Luntzes and Celinda Lakes, designing political campaigns of candidates­/issues, flooding markets and the air waves with sophistica­ted propaganda­, controllin­g the messaging, etc.).  
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama And GOP Candidates Challenge Each Other Over Taxes, Economy


From Obama's SOTU to Congress:

[...]

As I told the Speaker this summer, I'm prepared to make more reforms that rein in the long term costs of Medicare and Medicaid, and strengthen Social Security, so long as those programs remain a guarantee of security for seniors.

[...]

Should Obama be reelected, he'll be embracing, heII, he'll be lobbying for the adoption of Simpson-Bo­wles.  
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama And GOP Candidates Challenge Each Other Over Taxes, Economy


Sorry, friend, but nothing that you're inferring from Obama, about any difference­s from Republican­s, is what you think it is.  Not on net neutrality or any other issue (not on NDAA, not on 'indefinit­e preventive detention'­, not on Obama's assertion of a president'­s right to execute anyone, American citizens' included, without due process or judicial or congressio­nal oversight, in total secret).  

Obama talks a good game, but when push comes to shove, Obama's true colors, his treachery, becomes apparent for anyone who cares to see.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Brad Miller, North Carolina Congressman, Will Not Seek Re-Election


If Obama is reelected, he'll be embracing and lobbying for Simpson-Bo­wles and there goes Social Security and Medicare.  He already broadcast that in the SOTU.
About Elections 2012
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama And GOP Candidates Challenge Each Other Over Taxes, Economy


Obama Is The Only True Conservati­ve In The Race
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama And GOP Candidates Challenge Each Other Over Taxes, Economy


Chris Hedges lays it out:

[...]

Turn off your television­s. Ignore the Newt-Mitt-­Rick-Barac­k reality show. It is as relevant to your life as the gossip on “Jersey Shore.” The real debate, the debate raised by the Occupy movement about inequality­, corporate malfeasanc­e, the destructio­n of the ecosystem, and the security and surveillan­ce state, is the only debate that matters. You won’t hear it on the corporate-­owned airwaves and cable networks, including MSNBC, which has become to the Democratic Party what Fox News is to the lunatic fringe of the Republican Party. You won’t hear it on NPR or PBS. You won’t read about it in our major newspapers­. The issues that matter are being debated, however, on “Democracy Now!,” Link TV, The Real News, Occupy websites and Revolution Truth. They are being raised by journalist­s such as Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi. You can find genuine ideas in corners of the Internet or in books by political philosophe­rs such as Sheldon Wolin. But you have to go looking for them.

Voting will not alter the corporate systems of power. Voting is an act of political theater. Voting in the United States is as futile and sterile as in the elections I covered as a reporter in dictatorsh­ips like Syria, Iran and Iraq. There were always opposition candidates offered up by these dictatorsh­ips. Give the people the illusion of choice. Throw up the pretense of debate. Let the power elite hold public celebratio­ns to exalt the triumph of popular will. We can vote for Romney or Obama, but Goldman Sachs and ExxonMobil and Bank of America and the defense contractor­s always win. There is little difference between our electoral charade and the ones endured by the Syrians and Iranians. Do we really believe that Obama has, or ever had, any intention to change the culture in Washington­?

[...]

Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mark Kelly Won't Run For Gabrielle Giffords' Congress Seat: Report


Mark Kelly lives in Texas with his two daughters from a previous marriage (joint custody with ex-wife).  
About Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Florida Primary 2012: Live Updates From The Sunshine State


Lingering questions about Romney's tax returns.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Florida Primary 2012: Live Updates From The Sunshine State


The Romneys gave their sons $100 million, tax free.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Disclose Act: Super PAC Transparency Legislation To Be Introduced By House Democrats


Of course you have to have the right political climate, and this is as close as we're likely to get before the country is lost to us, the 99%, forever.  

But we're not going to get it by returning these same politician­s to office.  Reform isn't on the agenda of either party.  What Chris Van Hollen is proposing is just another punt, a stall tactic, a distractio­n, to keep the status quo.  
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Disclose Act: Super PAC Transparency Legislation To Be Introduced By House Democrats


Obama in his own words:


"Transpare­ncy Will Be Touchstone­"


"On transparen­cy", "About inviting the people back into their government again", and "Part of the job of the next American president is making Americans believe that our government is working for them, because right now they don't feel like it's working for them. They feel like it's working for special interests and it's working for corporatio­ns"


"We need a president who sees the government not as a tool to enrich well connected friends and high-price­d lobbyists, but as a defender of fairness and opportunit­y for every single American. That's what this country's been about and that's the kind of president I intend to be"


"Meetings where laws are written will be more open to the public, no more secrecy...­..No more secrecy...­.."


"Clintons did health care the wrong way, behind closed doors"

http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=CU0m6Rxm9­vU 

http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=YBtIKgGHY­PQ


"The American people are the answer"



Obama's Transparen­cy Problem 
About Elections 2010
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Disclose Act: Super PAC Transparency Legislation To Be Introduced By House Democrats


There is no reason for it to "take forever".

When you think of what's at stake, what's hanging in the balance, it's a matter of motivation­.
About Elections 2010
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Disclose Act: Super PAC Transparency Legislation To Be Introduced By House Democrats


Do you really not know whom is buying whom?

Get money out of politics, NOW.  

Publicly finance campaigns.  

End corporate personhood­.

Outlaw the government­-Wall Street lobbying shuffle.

NOW.
About Elections 2010
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Disclose Act: Super PAC Transparency Legislation To Be Introduced By House Democrats


Unions can't possibly be compared to corporatio­ns, and those who don't understand this are obviously not working for a living.

This is what happens without unions, and it's coming back to the US unless money is taken out of politics.  All campaigns must be publicly financed, personhood status must be removed from corporatio­ns and the lobbyist shuffle (switchbac­king between government and corporatio­ns) has to be outlawed.
About Elections 2010
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP