A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Biden To Democratic Base: 'Stop Whining'

Monday, September 27, 2010


Joe Biden, mistakenly, has been called a liberal, really just because of his folksy manner.  

If you take a look at Biden's voting record, he's been voting with Republicans on landmark bills to screw the People for a long time.

Biden's record on the overall Bankruptcy bill was shocking enough, but when you look at the amendments that Democrats tried to put into the bill to try to soften the blow to the People of the bill that passed and how Biden voted on them, no informed Democratic voter could ever call Biden a liberal again.  Here's just one amendment that Biden voted against:

 To reject a provision that would ensure that no elderly people in enough financial trouble to seek bankruptcy protection would lose their homes.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/3/6/63144/06015
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Biden To Democratic Base: 'Stop Whining'


 If you don't understand why Democratic and Independent voters are complaining, you aren't paying attention.
About Joe Biden
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Oil Commission Baffled By Lowball Estimates; Suspects They Slowed Response


Anyone making the claims you making is either ig.norant, or a political operative paid to spread disinformation.

Anyone can look up my comments for where I've refuted every one of your claims in the past and laid you and your opinions on the ground, in the dust.
About Gulf Oil Spill
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Sarah Palin In Shorts To Support Bristol On 'Dancing' (VIDEO)


I didn't mean that she was brandishing the child as Sarah Palin held Trig up to the cameras, as a 'badge of courage'.  

I meant that she was hiding behind the child, although I don't think she has a poor body image.  

If she's doing this show, Dancing With The Stars, to create buzz and interest in herself for more big money, easy television ventures (rumor has it that that was really what was driving the reconciliation between her and Levi Johnston -- a desire for easy big money of reality television --- and what k!lled the deal was her inability to sustain an audience's interest beyond one or two shows), her obvious disdain for the press and the public's attention that come with the kind of celebrity she's going after isn't going to end well for her.  

And the fact that none of Sarah Palin's advisers has taken Bristol under their wing and groomed her for how to handle the media attention suggests to me that Sarah Palin isn't going for a presidential run.  But if she made that known now, all of the money opportunities for her would dry up tomorrow, and it's the money that she (and the rest of the Palins) are really going for.   
About Sarah Palin
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Biden To Democratic Base: 'Stop Whining'


This is Joe Biden.  He's been mistakenly called a liberal, really just because of his folksy manner.  


If you take a look at Biden's voting record, he's been voting with Republicans on landmark bills to screw the People for a long time.

Biden's record on the overall Bankruptcy bill was shocking enough, but when you look at the amendments that Democrats tried to put into the bill to try to soften the blow to the People of the bill that passed and how Biden voted on them, no informed Democratic voter could ever call Biden a liberal again.  Here's just one amendment that Biden voted against:

 To reject a provision that would ensure that no elderly people in enough financial trouble to seek bankruptcy protection would lose their homes.


http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/3/6/63144/06015
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Oil Commission Baffled By Lowball Estimates; Suspects They Slowed Response


If you believe that then you haven't been paying attention.
About Gulf Oil Spill
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Sarah Palin In Shorts To Support Bristol On 'Dancing' (VIDEO)


Bristol only took her child out of the arms of the 'minder' when saw that she was approaching the paparazzi.  Bristol has learned from her mother how to use her child as a prop, to block and deflect.

And it seems that Sarah Palin has swapped using Trig that way and now buries herself behind Trig's 'minder' and with a blackberry in each hand.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

White House And Bill Kristol: Despite Not Being In 'Pledge', GOP Will Privatize Social Security


Will the GOP Private Social Security?

Democrats are poised to:


DCCC’s Chair Van Hollen Won’t Commit to Protecting Social Security from Cuts/Higher Retirement Age
http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/65637



And the fact that Obama has put Social Security on the table at all of his 'Debt Commission', which runs a surplus.  With a group, all of whom support privatizing Social Security.  

But why would anybody be surprised by that.  It is the SOP for the deceitful Obama & DLC-controlled Democratic Party (DINOs).   

Just like early in the healthcare legislation process, Obama declaring that he wouldn't sign any legislation that didn't include a public option (and then k!lling the move to slip it at the last minute -- Few even know about that), Obama will preside over the gutting & privatization of Social Security before his term is over.
 
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Oil Commission Baffled By Lowball Estimates; Suspects They Slowed Response


The White House had the live feed from the first day and knew that the amount of oil gushing exceeded what BP was stating. The White House also knew that the sea floor had probably been compromised, and that oil was coming from more than one source.

The White House was calling the shots, preventing journalists from covering this, letting BP use a toxic dispersant banned in the UK to make the problem even worse.

It's obvious to many that Obama is a continuation of Bush, and "look forward, not back" is for trying to obscure that fact. 

About Gulf Oil Spill
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Oil Commission Baffled By Lowball Estimates; Suspects They Slowed Response


Do you realize that none of the thousands of companies drilling in the Gulf of Mexico have a plan to clean up "spills" (let's find a new word)?

There isn't one plan, and the government knew it.
About Gulf Oil Spill
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Oil Commission Baffled By Lowball Estimates; Suspects They Slowed Response


Expanding on dougeyboy's comment, Bush and Cheney did what they wanted to do, ignored opposition, Democrats allowed it and didn't use their ability (once they got it in 2006) to stop what Bush/Cheney & Republicans were doing.  Democrats lost plausible deniability then, once they got what they had been using as their excuse for doing nothing the entirety of the Bush-Cheney first 6 years.

Look around you at Obama's 'most ardent supporters'.  They're no better than Bushies.  They keep his numbers high continue to govern in the best interests of the corporations and the very richest.
About Gulf Oil Spill
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Oil Commission Baffled By Lowball Estimates; Suspects They Slowed Response


None of these people testified under oath.

This is a show commission.  
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

White House And Bill Kristol: Despite Not Being In 'Pledge', GOP Will Privatize Social Security


Both corporate parties (Republicans and the DLC-controlled Democrats) will privatized Social Security.

The truth about Obama (and the DLC's intentions) is, as usual, in his lawyer-speak and in his behavior.

Obama Packs Debt Commission with Social Security Looters:

Obama has filled his new 'debt commission' with Wall Street insiders determined to gut Social Security
http://www.alternet.org/story/146183/obama_pack s_debt_com mission_wi th_social_ security_l ooters?page=entire
 
Obama Packs Debt Commission With Social Security Privatization & Benefit Cut Supporters
http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2010/05/10/obama-packs-debt-committee-with-supportes-of-social-security-benefit-cuts-and-privatization/


http://www.truth-out.org/obama-catfood-commissioner-threatens-small-town-with-nuclear-annihilation62852gt; 

You don't put Social Security on the table at all before a 'Deficit Commission' (it's not in danger of going broke, to begin with) or put people like this on your commission if you weren't signaling that you're open to doing it.   

And Chris Van Hollen made an interesting parsing slip on CNN about that very point (he never was the brightest color in the box -- Democratic voters are d00med if this is the future leadership of the party).  Go hunt: http://archives.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1008/15/sotu.01.html


[Hint: "partial"]
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

U.S. Works To Make Internet Wiretaps Easier


I don't have anything that I would object to someone else reading,but GWB doesn't look so bad anymore.
====================================

Bush obviously didn't look so bad to you before, or else why would you resurrect that line from his administration, "If you don't have anything to hide, why would you mind?"

And, of course you would object to everyone else being able to read everything you write.  

You go by a pseudonym here, as do all of us.  If you're a human being, you have a desire and a need for privacy; as an American you have an expectation that you are the one who controls what others may know about you.  That expectation comes from rights guaranteed to us all in the Constitution.  But you're just assuming that it's you and your kind (Republicans & DLC-Democrats) who will always be doing the snooping, not being one of the snooped on.  

While it's likely that the anti-Constitutionalists (Republicans & DLC-Democrats) who are behind this will always retain control, it's not likely that you can expect to be free of targeting by them, no matter if you're 
a cynical paid political operative who thinks you're one of 'the gang' or just ig.no.rant and think you're safe because you have no 'impure thoughts' against the powers that be.

Because either way, once the dissenters are dispensed with, their way of being and governing requires a siege-mentality, 24/7, with their always needing some enemy to distract people's attention.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

U.S. Works To Make Internet Wiretaps Easier


And, of course you would object to everyone else being able to read everything you write.  

You go by a pseudonym here, as do all of us.  If you're a human being, you have a desire and a need for privacy, as an American you have an expectation that you are the one who controls what others may kknow about you.  That expectation comes from rights guaranteed to you in the Constitution.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

U.S. Works To Make Internet Wiretaps Easier


He obviously didn't look so bad to you before -- You've resurrected your line from his administration, "If you don't have anything to hide, why would you mind?"
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

The Disillusionment Of David Axelrod


All the while stocks and Wall Street's fortunes increase.

If Obama's finance reform legislation, which does nothing by the way to prevent another meltdown, was so bad for Wall Streeters, they wouldn't have been popping corks on champagne bottles when it passed.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Invokes 'State Secrets' Claim To Dismiss Lawsuit Against Targeting Of U.S. Citizen


You and every other advocate for gvns as the solution for citizens against government abuses and overreach fails to comprehend the very nature and purpose of a democracy and rule of law (to live without violence and anarchy), and are su!cidal if you believe that your gvns are any match for the weaponry and resources of the US government.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

U.S. Works To Make Internet Wiretaps Easier


To those of Obama's 'most ardent supporters' who are trying to defend Obama's actions by downplaying this assault on the Constitution's protections of citizens' privacy or that "you have no email privacy rights or that "the times call for it", or that "Clinton did it, too, so it must be ok", or that "you are overreacting; Obama's not going to be illegally taping anyone, or expanding his federal authority one iota", etc., should think very carefully about the liberties they're taking by playing fast and loose with facts and truth in their zealous blind loyalty to a man and a party whose interests are not those of the average American.  


Because we see very dramatically in the last decade of Bush-Cheney abuses, DLC-controlled Democratic administrations and Congresses don't bring previous criminal administrations to justice or overturn their abuses.  

DLC-controlled Democrats are building upon the GOP's abuses.  We the People can't count on the the courts to be the last resort to save us and the Constitution from these assaults; the wheels of justice grind too slowly, but especially since both parties have packed the courts with anti-populist, pro-corporate judges.

There's no coming back from this.  

Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

U.S. Works To Make Internet Wiretaps Easier


To those of Obama's 'most ardent supporters' who are trying to defend Obama's actions by downplaying this assault on the Constitution's protections of citizens' privacy or that "the times call for it", or that "Clinton did it, too, so it must be ok", or that people "are overreacting; Obama's not going to be illegally taping anyone, or expanding his federal authority one iota" (that one is a flat-out false assertion), etc., should think very carefully about their blind loyalty to a man and a party whose interests are not those of the average American.  

Because we see very dramatically in the last decade of Bush-Cheney abuses, DLC-controlled Democratic administrations and Congresses don't bring previous criminal administrations to justice or overturn their abuses.  

DLC-controlled Democrats are building upon the GOP's abuses.  We the People can't count on the the courts to be the last resort to save us and the Constitution from these assaults; the wheels of justice grind too slowly, but especially since both parties have packed the courts with anti-populist, pro-corporate judges.

There's no coming back from this.  
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

U.S. Works To Make Internet Wiretaps Easier


What the Obama administration tried to hide in its 'Friday newsdump' was its response filing to the lawsuit filed by Anwar Awlaki's father asking a court to enjoin Obama from assass!nating his son, a US citizen, without any due process.  

The administration filed a brief late Thursday night asking the court to dismiss the lawsuit without hearing the merits of the claims.  

That's not surprising:  both the Bush and Obama administrations have repeatedly insisted that their secret conduct is legal but nonetheless urge courts not to even rule on its legality.  

But what's most notable here is that one of the arguments the Obama DOJ raises to demand dismissal of this lawsuit is "state secrets":  in other words, not only does a president have the right to sentence Americans to de@th with no due process or charges of any kind, but his decisions as to who will be k!lled and why he wants them de@d are "state secrets," and thus no court may adjudicate their legality.


That, in and of itself, should be shocking to all Americans.  


That Obama would do this on the heels of the 2008 campaign where he campaigned for himself as a champion of the Constitution and against Bush's disregard for the rule of law, in addition to the fact that Awlaki has never been charged with a crime, much less convicted, leaves no doubt about Obama's character: He has none.

To those of Obama's 'most ardent supporters' who are trying to defend Obama's actions by downplaying this assault on the Constitution's protections of citizens' privacy or that "the times call for it", or that "Clinton did it, too, so it must be ok", or that people "are overreacting; Obama's not going to be illegally taping anyone, or expanding his federal authority one iota" (that one is a flat-out false assertion), etc., should think very carefully about their blind loyalty to a man and a party whose interests are not those of the average American.  


Because we see very dramatically in the last decade of Bush-Cheney abuses, DLC-controlled Democratic administrations and Congresses don't bring previous criminal administrations to justice or overturn their abuses.  


DLC-controlled Democrats are building upon the GOP's abuses.  We the People can't count on the the courts to be the last resort to save us and the Constitution from these assaults; the wheels of justice grind too slowly, but especially since both parties have packed the courts with anti-populist, pro-corporate judges.


There's no coming back from this.  
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

U.S. Works To Make Internet Wiretaps Easier


What the Obama administration tried to hide in its 'Friday newsdump' was its response filing to the lawsuit filed by Anwar Awlaki's father asking a court to enjoin Obama from assassinating his son, a US citizen, without any due process.  

The administration filed a brief late Thursday night asking the court to dismiss the lawsuit without hearing the merits of the claims.  

That's not surprising:  both the Bush and Obama administrations have repeatedly insisted that their secret conduct is legal but nonetheless urge courts not to even rule on its legality.  

But what's most notable here is that one of the arguments the Obama DOJ raises to demand dismissal of this lawsuit is "state secrets":  in other words, not only does a president have the right to sentence Americans to death with no due process or charges of any kind, but his decisions as to who will be killed and why he wants them dead are "state secrets," and thus no court may adjudicate their legality.


That, in and of itself, should be shocking to all Americans.  


That Obama would do this on the heels of the 2008 campaign where he campaigned for himself as a champion of the Constitution and against Bush's disregard for the rule of law, in addition to the fact that Awlaki has never been charged with a crime, much less convicted, leaves no doubt about Obama's character: He has none.

To those of Obama's 'most ardent supporters' who are trying to defend Obama's actions by downplaying this assault on the Constitution's protections of citizens' privacy or that "the times call for it", or that "Clinton did it, too, so it must be ok", or that people "are overreacting; Obama's not going to be illegally taping anyone, or expanding his federal authority one iota" (that one is a flat-out false assertion), etc., should think very carefully about their blind loyalty to a man and a party whose interests are not those of the average American.  


Because we see very dramatically in the last decade of Bush-Cheney abuses, DLC-controlled Democratic administrations and Congresses don't bring previous criminal administrations to justice or overturn their abuses.  


DLC-controlled Democrats are building upon the GOP's abuses.  We the People can't count on the the courts to be the last resort to save us and the Constitution from these assaults; the wheels of justice grind too slowly, but especially since both parties have packed the courts with anti-populist, pro-corporate judges.


There's no coming back from this.  
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

U.S. Works To Make Internet Wiretaps Easier


The Obama Administration's War on Privacy

In early August, two dictatorial (and U.S.-allied) Gulf states -- Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates -- announced a ban on the use of Blackberries because, as the BBC put it, "[b]oth nations are unhappy that they are unable to monitor such communications via the handsets."  Those two governments demand the power to intercept and monitor every single form of communication.  No human interaction may take place beyond their prying ears.  Since Blackberry communication data are sent directly to servers in Canada and the company which operates Blackberry -- Research in Motion -- refused to turn the data over to those governments, "authorities decided to ban Blackberry services rather than continue to allow an uncontrolled and unmonitored flow of electronic information within their borders."  That's the core mindset of the Omnipotent Surveillance State:  above all else, what is strictly prohibited is the ability of citizens to communicate in private; we can't have any "uncontrolled and unmonitored flow of electronic information."  
That controversy generated substantial coverage in the US media, which depicted it as reflective of the censorship and all-consuming surveillance powers of those undemocratic states.  But the following week, The New York Times published an Op-Ed by Richard Falkenrath -- a top-level Homeland Security official in the Bush administration and current principal in the private firm of former Bush DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff -- expressing support for the UAE's Blackberry ban.  Falkenrath asserted that "[a]mong law enforcement investigators and intelligence officers [in the U.S.], the Emirates’ decision met with approval, admiration and perhaps even a touch of envy."  New Internet technologies -- including voice-over-Internet calls (such as Skype) and text messaging -- are increasingly difficult for governments to monitor, and Falkenrath noted, correctly, that the UAE "is in no way unique in wanting a back door into the telecommunications services used inside its borders to allow officials to eavesdr0p on users."  The U.S. Government is every bit as eager as the UAE and Saudi Arabia to ensure full and unfettered access to everyone's communications:

READ MORE @ http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/09/27/privacy/index.html
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

U.S. Works To Make Internet Wiretaps Easier


The Obama Administration's War on Privacy

The Washington Post reports this morning that the Obama administration wants to require U.S. banks to report all electronic money transfers into and out of the country, a dramatic expansion in efforts to counter terror!st financing and money laundering."  Whereas banks are now required to report all such transactions over $10,000 or which are otherwise suspicious, "the new rule would require banks to disclose even the smallest transfers."  "The proposal also calls for banks to provide annually the Social Security numbers for all wire-transfer senders and recipients."  It would create a centralized database enabling the U.S. Government to monitor a vastly expanded range of financial transactions engaged in by people who are under no suspicion whatsoever of criminal activity:

"This regulation is outrageous," said Peter Djinis, a lawyer who advises financial institutions on complying with financial rules and a former FinCEN executive assistant director for regulatory policy. "Consider me old-fashioned, but I believe you need to show some evidence of criminality before you are granted unfettered access to the private financial affairs of every individual and company that dares to conduct financial transactions overseas."
That concept -- that the U.S. Government should not be monitoring, surveilling and collecting data on individuals who are not under criminal investigation -- was once the hallmark of basic American liberty, so uncontroversial as to require no defense.

READ MORE @ http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/09/27/privacy/index.html
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

U.S. Works To Make Internet Wiretaps Easier


The Obama Administration's War on Privacy

The Washington Post reports this morning that the Obama administration wants to require U.S. banks to report all electronic money transfers into and out of the country, a dramatic expansion in efforts to counter terror!st financing and money laundering."  Whereas banks are now required to report all such transactions over $10,000 or which are otherwise suspicious, "the new rule would require banks to disclose even the smallest transfers."  "The proposal also calls for banks to provide annually the Social Security numbers for all wire-transfer senders and recipients."  It would create a centralized database enabling the U.S. Government to monitor a vastly expanded range of financial transactions engaged in by people who are under no suspicion whatsoever of criminal activity:

"This regulation is outrageous," said Peter Djinis, a lawyer who advises financial institutions on complying with financial rules and a former FinCEN executive assistant director for regulatory policy. "Consider me old-fashioned, but I believe you need to show some evidence of criminality before you are granted unfettered access to the private financial affairs of every individual and company that dares to conduct financial transactions overseas."
That concept -- that the U.S. Government should not be monitoring, surveilling and collecting data on individuals who are not under criminal investigation -- was once the hallmark of basic American liberty, so uncontroversial as to require no defense.

READ MORE @ http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/09/27/privacy/index.html
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

U.S. Works To Make Internet Wiretaps Easier


No, it's this president who is throwing himself under the bus, by trying to throw the People and the US Constitution under the bus.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/26/AR2010092603941.html>
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/09/27/privacy/index.html
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

U.S. Works To Make Internet Wiretaps Easier


The Obama Administration's War on Privacy

The Washington Post reports this morning that the Obama administration wants to require U.S. banks to report all electronic money transfers into and out of the country, a dramatic expansion in efforts to counter terrorist financing and money laundering."  Whereas banks are now required to report all such transactions over $10,000 or which are otherwise suspicious, "the new rule would require banks to disclose even the smallest transfers."  "The proposal also calls for banks to provide annually the Social Security numbers for all wire-transfer senders and recipients."  It would create a centralized database enabling the U.S. Government to monitor a vastly expanded range of financial transactions engaged in by people who are under no suspicion whatsoever of criminal activity:

"This regulation is outrageous," said Peter Djinis, a lawyer who advises financial institutions on complying with financial rules and a former FinCEN executive assistant director for regulatory policy. "Consider me old-fashioned, but I believe you need to show some evidence of criminality before you are granted unfettered access to the private financial affairs of every individual and company that dares to conduct financial transactions overseas."
That concept -- that the U.S. Government should not be monitoring, surveilling and collecting data on individuals who are not under criminal investigation -- was once the hallmark of basic American liberty, so uncontroversial as to require no defense.

READ MORE @ http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/09/27/privacy/index.html
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

U.S. Works To Make Internet Wiretaps Easier


The Obama Administration's War on Privacy

In early August, two dictatorial (and U.S.-allied) Gulf states -- Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates -- announced a ban on the use of Blackberries because, as theBBC put it, "[b]oth nations are unhappy that they are unable to monitor such communications via the handsets."  Those two governments demand the power to intercept and monitor every single form of communication.  No human interaction may take place beyond their prying ears.  Since Blackberry communication data are sent directly to servers in Canada and the company which operates Blackberry -- Research in Motion -- refused to turn the data over to those governments, "authorities decided to ban Blackberry services rather than continue to allow an uncontrolled and unmonitored flow of electronic information within their borders."  That's the core mindset of the Omnipotent Surveillance State:  above all else, what is strictly prohibited is the ability of citizens to communicate in private; we can't have any "uncontrolled and unmonitored flow of electronic information."  

That controversy generated substantial coverage in the U.S. media, which depicted it as reflective of the censorship and all-consuming surveillance powers of those undemocratic states.  But the following week, The New York Times published an Op-Ed by Richard Falkenrath -- a top-level Homeland Security official in the Bush administration and current principal in the private firm of former Bush DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff -- expressing support for the UAE's Blackberry ban.  Falkenrath asserted that "[a]mong law enforcement investigators and intelligence officers [in the U.S.], the Emirates’ decision met with approval, admiration and perhaps even a touch of envy."  New Internet technologies -- including voice-over-Internet calls (such as Skype) and text messaging -- are increasingly difficult for governments to monitor, and Falkenrath noted, correctly, that the UAE "is in no way unique in wanting a back door into the telecommunications services used inside its borders to allow officials to eavesdrop on users."  The U.S. Government is every bit as eager as the UAE and Saudi Arabia to ensure full and unfettered access to everyone's communications:

READ MORE @ http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/09/27/privacy/index.html
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

U.S. Works To Make Internet Wiretaps Easier


^ - Here.

Most Democratic voters bought an image that ceased to be true about today's DLC-controlled Democratic Party about 20 years ago.

When the DLC joined with the Republicans in bad-mouthing liberals, and instead of helping to inform the public about the fact that every positive invention and advancement to our society came through and because of liberals, let the beatification of Reagan take place.

When Democratic voters gave the nomination to Obama instead of Hillary Clinton (who, along with her husband and Joe Lieberman and Al From, founded the DLC), they thought that they were taking control of the Democratic Party back from the DLC.  Democratic voters were punked.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

U.S. Works To Make Internet Wiretaps Easier


Obama wants to require:

-Any service that provides encrypted messages must be capable of unscrambling them. 

-Any foreign communications providers that do business in the U.S. would have to have an office in the United States that's capable of providing intercepts. 

-Software developers of peer-to-peer communications services would be required to redesign their products to allow interception. 

Privacy and technology advocates say the regulations would create weaknesses in the technology that hackers could more easily exploit. 

Only the State May Have Secrets:  

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/09/25/secrecy/index.html">Obama argues his 'assassinating American citizens without any due process or oversight'-program is a "state secret" - http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/09/25/secrecy/index.html
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP