Obama cannot just unilaterally make changes- his legislators have to cooperate as well. Honestly, the level of intransigence is clear in that his opposition is solely focused on thwarting any move he makes, because they understand it.
==========
==========
==========
==========
=====
Obama never pressured BenNelson (or BlancheLin
coln, or any BlueDog). The Democratic leadership could've taken away committee chairs (BlancheLi
ncoln's, too) of members in their caucus that filibuster
ed a PublicOpti
on for healthcare
. They didn't.
The DNC could've taken away reelection funds. They didn't.
Reid could've actually forced Republican
s and turncoat Democratic senators to filibuster
. He didn't (and doesn't).
The Progressiv
eCaucus could have kept their pledge about not voting for a bill that didn't include a robust PublicOpti
on. They didn't.
Obama
DID unleash the attack dogs to go after HowardDean when Dean said it was a lousy bill. Dean was then forced to get back into line. Obama went after Kucinich, the last remaining holdout on the Progressiv
eCaucus, for threatenin
g to vote no on the healthcare bill, and we all know how that ended.
There is nothing that Lieberman (or Nelson or Lincoln) is doing that Obama hasn't ordered. Obama and the DLC-Democr
ats want Lieberman there, doing what he's doing, which is to take the heat off of Democrats.
And the proof of this is that (since you mention Nelson), when Obama needed Nelson re: StupakAmen
dment, he 'bought' his support. That's what Obama could've done for Nelson's or Lincoln's vote at any time, on any legislatio
n.
There could be 100 "progressi
ves" in the Senate and 435 in the House, and they and Obama would still find a way to deliver to corporatio
ns instead of the People and blame it on Republican
s. Because they're DLC, aka Republican
s-in-Democ
rats'-clot
hing.
Obama and the DLC worked their butts off to
PREVENT more progressiv
es/liberal
s from getting elected. Obama and the DLC have put the power of the White House, the DNC, and the Democratic congressio
nal committees behind BlueDogs, Republican
s and Independen
ts over progressiv
es/liberal
s and real Democrats. Some, but not all, examples:
BlueDog BlancheLin
coln over progressiv
e Democrat Lt. Governor BillHalter
.
Republican
-turned-In
dependent ArlenSpect
er over progressiv
e Democrat JoeSestak.
Republican
-turned-In
dependent LincolnCha
ffee over Democrat FrankCapri
o (which, in turn, was an effective endorsemen
t of the Republican JohnLoughl
in over Democrat DavidCicil
line for the congressio
nal seat Democrat PatrickKen
nedy retired from, and all of the other seats up for grab in RhodeIslan
d).
Republican
-turned-In
dependent CharlieCri
st over liberal Democrat KendrickMe
ek.
Republican
s, with the smallest minority, have managed to thwart Democrats, who've had the greatest majority in decades. You would think that with Republican
s controllin
g the House, Democrats would've turned the tables and thwarted Republican
s' continuing legislatio
n like Bush's tax cuts for the rich? Are Democrats just stupld?
KEEP READINGRead the Article at HuffingtonPost
Read more...