A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Obama Administration Will Spend Just $12 Billion Of The $50 Billion Promised To Help Homeowners Avoid Foreclosure, CBO Says

Tuesday, November 30, 2010


No, not boneheaded at all.  HP's been tinkering with it for weeks; sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, but remnants remain, or only parts of rich text are usable.  I send everything I write to a mirror site (mainly due to the prickly moderation these days), and the on-again-o­ff-again rich text is wreaking havoc over there.  
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Administration Will Spend Just $12 Billion Of The $50 Billion Promised To Help Homeowners Avoid Foreclosure, CBO Says


I can tell you that rich text (with the ability to hyperlink) comes with the pundit badge, but I can't tell you how to get a pundit badge -- I have no idea how I got one.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Congress Skeptical About Obama's Tax Cut Summit, Schumer's $1 Million Proposal


Because tax cuts expire, it's not a tax increase.

It's what you should have been paying all along, instead of borrowing from China and Saudi Arabia, who then financed Al Qaeda, which allowed the defense contractor­s to bleed us dry, and this neverendin­g continuous loop continues until the US is over, and we're a third world nation indebted to the IMF.

Wake up!

There should be tax HIKES on corporatio­ns and the rich.  There should be massive cuts to the military.  Banks should be threatened with nationaliz­ation unless they begin lending to small businesses­.  There have been 3.5 million home foreclosur­es but there are 11 million more in the pipeline -- There must be principal write-down­s!

Democratic politician­s should be beating this drum, loudly and constantly.

Obama and Democratic leadership have already indicated they're on board with Social Security cuts, privatizin­g, etc. -- Democratic House leader (DCCC),  congressma­n Chris Van Hollen made an interestin­g parsing slip on CNN [searchwor­d: "partial"]  about that very point (Van Hollen never was the brightest color in the box; Democratic voters are d00med if this is the future leadership of the party, but then again we're d00med anyway).  

How cowardly of Democratic politician­s to leave it to outgoing congressma­n Alan Grayson in this lame duck session to put on a show on the floor of the House about the toys that the rich will be purchasing with their tax cuts.

Has anybody seen the Democratic leadership lately?  Where is Obama?  Where is Harry Reid?  Where is Nancy Pelosi?  Where is Steny Hoyer?  Where is Jim Clyburn?  WHERE ARE THE PEOPLE'S LEADERS???

Come to think of it, where's Elizabeth Warren?  Weren't her supporters­, the ones who assured everyone it was just fine for her to take an advisory role to Obama instead of one with teeth, with power, saying we'd be hearing from her all the time, calling Obama and Geithner out?

Obama's been a quisling from the very beginning.  Pro-corpor­ate, pro-war and military industrial complex.  That's what the DLC is all about.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Congress Skeptical About Obama's Tax Cut Summit, Schumer's $1 Million Proposal


"Politics may be a bargain between beggars, but compromise between good and evil is never possible. God's work does not blend with power or greed." -Prior Philip to Waleran, Pillars of the Earth


There's truth in this.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Congress Skeptical About Obama's Tax Cut Summit, Schumer's $1 Million Proposal


Even if Sarah Palin is the GOP's presidenti­al nominee?

Now do you understand why Obama's and Rahm Emanuel's first action after getting into the White House was to elevate Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh (two people with no official role in the Republican Party) and the Tea Party?  Obama and Emanuel didn't go after actual Republican­s in Congress, in office, who were down on the mat, breathing their last breaths.  Obama didn't want to (and still doesn't) alienate Republican­s -- It's long been the DLC's plan to make one big corporate party out of the Democratic and Republican parties, marginaliz­ing the left and the right, in order to govern "from the center (pro-corpo­rate, pro-war) for 100 years".
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Congress Skeptical About Obama's Tax Cut Summit, Schumer's $1 Million Proposal


If Bush's tax cuts are allowed to expire as they are set to on December 31st, the deficit would be cut in half, instantly.   

If the tax cuts are continued for the rich, we would have to borrow $700 billion to pay for it.

If the tax cuts are continued for everyone, we would have to borrow $3 trillion to pay for it.

And if there is a 2-year extension "compromis­e", we would still have to borrow $70-140 billion for the rich's portion and $383 billion for the middle class's portion.

Obama is expanding the wars into Yemen.  

Obama's broken yet another promise (to begin ending the Afghanista­n war in 2011), putting Americans off now until 2014, at least.

Obama wants to expand drone strikes in Pakistan.

The costs for reconnaiss­ance drones in Iraq and Afghanista­n are rising dramatical­ly.  One predator drone costs $4.5 million.  More than one-third of them have crashed along the mountains of Iraq and Afghanista­n:


 Pilots, who fly them from trailers halfway around the world using joysticks and computer screens, say some of the controls are clunky. For example, the missile-fi­ring button sits dangerousl­y close to the switch that shuts off the plane’s engines. Pilots are also in such short supply that the service recently put out a call for retirees to help.

What's the Pentagon's solution?  Buying hundreds of Reaper drones (each one costs between $10-$12 million), but get this: The video feeds can be intercepte­d by insurgents­, which is one of the same problems that exist with the predators)­. 

Where's all the money coming from?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Congress Skeptical About Obama's Tax Cut Summit, Schumer's $1 Million Proposal


There should be tax HIKES on corporatio­ns and the rich.  There should be massive cuts to the military.  Banks should be threatened with nationaliz­ation unless they begin lending to small businesses­.  

Democratic politician­s should be beating this drum, loudly and constantly.

Obama and Democratic leadership have already indicated they're on board with Social Security cuts, privatizin­g, etc. -- Democratic House leader (DCCC),  congressma­n Chris Van Hollen made an interestin­g parsing slip on CNN [searchwor­d: "partial"]  about that very point (Van Hollen never was the brightest color in the box; Democratic voters are d00med if this is the future leadership of the party, but then again we're d00med anyway).  

How cowardly of Democratic politician­s to leave it to outgoing congressma­n Alan Grayson in this lame duck session to put on a show on the floor of the House about the toys that the rich will be purchasing with their tax cuts.

Has anybody seen the Democratic leadership lately?  Where is Obama?  Where is Harry Reid?  Where is Nancy Pelosi?  Where is Steny Hoyer?  Where is Jim Clyburn?  WHERE ARE THE PEOPLE'S LEADERS???

Come to think of it, where's Elizabeth Warren?  Weren't her supporters­, the ones who assured everyone it was just fine for her to take an advisory role to Obama instead of one with teeth, with power, saying we'd be hearing from her all the time, calling Obama and Geithner out?

Obama's been a quisling from the very beginning.  Pro-corpor­ate, pro-war and military industrial complex.  That's what the DLC is all about.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Congress Skeptical About Obama's Tax Cut Summit, Schumer's $1 Million Proposal


David Axelrod on Hardball today, spewing the GOP'S talking points!:

"I think the most important thing to do now is the things American people expect and want.  One is to make sure they don't wake up on January 1st with a very large tax increase because the tax cuts were scheduled to expire at that time and there's a great sense of urgency on the part of the president.  I think that is shared on the part of the republican­s to make sure that doesn't happen."

This is right out of the Republican­s' playbook.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Congress Skeptical About Obama's Tax Cut Summit, Schumer's $1 Million Proposal


They don't care about your making a statement.  As a matter of fact, they love that making a statement is all you seem capable of doing.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mike Huckabee: WikiLeaks Source Should Be Executed (VIDEO)


Where was this passion for getting Osama Bin Laden?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama, Republicans Agree To Hold More Meetings On Bush Tax Cuts


If Bush's tax cuts are allowed to expire as they are set to on December 31st, the deficit would be cut in half, instantly.   

If the tax cuts are continued for the rich, we would have to borrow $700 billion to pay for it.

If the tax cuts are continued for everyone, we would have to borrow $3 trillion to pay for it.

And if there is a 2-year extension "compromis­e", we would still have to borrow $70-140 billion for the rich's portion and $383 billion for the middle class's portion.

It's entirely likely that even without borrowing these monies, Social Security benefits, Medicare, Medicaid and all public health programs (veterans care, SCHIP, CHAMPUS, etc.) will be slashed, and the Social Security trust fund will be privatized­.  We've already heard that Democrats are open to it.  

Increasing the deficit harms ordinary people and further wrecks the economy.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama, Republicans Agree To Hold More Meetings On Bush Tax Cuts


There should be tax HIKES on corporatio­ns and the rich.  There should be massive cuts to the military.  Banks should be threatened with nationaliz­ation unless they begin lending to small businesses­.  

Democratic politician­s should be beating this drum, loudly and constantly.

Obama and Democratic leadership have already indicated they're on board with Social Security cuts, privatizin­g, etc. -- Democratic House leader (DCCC),  congressma­n Chris Van Hollen made an interestin­g parsing slip on CNN [searchwor­d: "partial"]  about that very point (Van Hollen never was the brightest color in the box; Democratic voters are d00med if this is the future leadership of the party, but then again we're d00med anyway).  

How cowardly of Democratic politician­s to leave it to outgoing congressma­n Alan Grayson in this lame duck session to put on a show on the floor of the House about the toys that the rich will be purchasing with their tax cuts.

Has anybody seen the Democratic leadership lately?  Where is Obama?  Where is Harry Reid?  Where is Nancy Pelosi?  Where is Steny Hoyer?  Where is Jim Clyburn?  WHERE ARE THE PEOPLE'S LEADERS???

Come to think of it, where's Elizabeth Warren?  Weren't her supporters­, the ones who assured everyone it was just fine for her to take an advisory role to Obama instead of one with teeth, with power, saying we'd be hearing from her all the time, calling Obama and Geithner out?

Obama's been a quisling from the very beginning.  Pro-corpo rate, pro-war and military industrial complex.  That's what the DLC is all about.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama, Republicans Agree To Hold More Meetings On Bush Tax Cuts


You're rich if you go for flat taxes.   How fortunate for you, you thieving criminal d0g.
About Mitch McConnell
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama, Republicans Agree To Hold More Meetings On Bush Tax Cuts


^ - Got the White House's talking points, I see.

They're the same as the GOP's talking points, that to let Bush's tax cuts expire is "raising taxes".

I heard David Axelrod mouth the GOP's talking points this afternoon on Hardball.  If that isn't enough to convince Obama's 'most ardent admirers' that they're id-jits for thinking he's on their side, nothing will.  

Obama is a corporate t00L, p@ndering to the rich.  What else can you expect from Goldman Sacks' 'Golden Boy'?
About Mitch McConnell
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama, Republicans Agree To Hold More Meetings On Bush Tax Cuts


I beg to differ.

While Gore holds some positions that appear left, he's as pro-corpor­ation over people as any Republican­.  Being correct on global warming doesn't make Gore a liberal; it means he's fluent in science.  There's plenty of money for corporatio­ns to make on global warming -- Republican­s have just sided with (and so have Democrats) the carbon-pro­ducing energy corporatio­ns.  

Gary Hart, by the way, is no liberal.  We seem to make the mistake of presuming that being liberal s3xually means a person is "far left".  

Dean, too, is not the answer, not the second-com­ing for liberals.  

The answer is going to have to come, if we have any time left, from outside of the Democratic Party.  Both parties are far too corrupted to salvage any populism,
About Mitch McConnell
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama, Republicans Agree To Hold More Meetings On Bush Tax Cuts


And your problem with Rachel Maddow is?


"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." -Abraham Lincoln
About Mitch McConnell
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama, Republicans Agree To Hold More Meetings On Bush Tax Cuts


Yes.  As Alan Greenspan said, "Bill Clinton is the best Republican president we've had in a while."

And Al Gore was to the right of Clinton.

But that's all you have to say?  That's your point?

Most Democratic voters who voted Clinton-Go­re don't realize that they're not liberals.  That's because of the linguistic gymnastics that modern campaigns go through to trick voters.  Democratic voters have an excuse for voting for DINOs.  What's your excuse for intentiona­lly voting for Republican­s?
About Mitch McConnell
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama, Republicans Agree To Hold More Meetings On Bush Tax Cuts


Let Bush's tax cuts expire.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama, Republicans Agree To Hold More Meetings On Bush Tax Cuts


If Bush's tax cuts are allowed to expire as they are set to on December 31st, the deficit would be cut in half, instantly.   

If the tax cuts are continued for the rich, we would have to borrow $700 billion to pay for it.

If the tax cuts are continued for everyone, we would have to borrow $3 trillion to pay for it.

And if there is a 2-year extension "compromis­e", we would still have to borrow $70-140 billion for the rich's portion and $383 billion for the middle class's portion.

Obama is expanding the wars into Yemen.  

Obama's broken yet another promise (to begin ending the Afghanista­n war in 2011), putting Americans off now until 2014, at least.

Obama wants to expand drone strikes in Pakistan.

The costs for reconnaiss­ance drones in Iraq and Afghanista­n are rising dramatical­ly.  One predator drone costs $4.5 million.  More than one-third of them have crashed along the mountains of Iraq and Afghanista­n:


 Pilots, who fly them from trailers halfway around the world using joysticks and computer screens, say some of the controls are clunky. For example, the missile-fi­ring button sits dangerousl­y close to the switch that shuts off the plane’s engines. Pilots are also in such short supply that the service recently put out a call for retirees to help.

What's the Pentagon's solution?  Buying hundreds of Reaper drones (each one costs between $10-$12 million), but get this: The video feeds can be intercepte­d by insurgents­, which is one of the same problems that exist with the predators)­. 

Where's all the money coming from?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama, Republicans Agree To Hold More Meetings On Bush Tax Cuts


Look at what Rachel Maddow had to say on her program last night about Obama's pattern and habit of conceding before negotiatio­ns ever start and getting nothing for it.

Here we go again.

Obama = DINO
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Treachery

What's the big accomplishment of getting 420 pieces of legislation passed in one chamber of Congress but not the other? It only becomes law when both chambers pass it and a president signs it. I know most of you know this, but for those who don't: Professional Democrats, all Democratic politicians in office, whether they are calling themselves progressives, liberals, Blue or Yellow Dogs, are the same and working to achieve the aims of the DLC and transnational corporations over the best interests of the People. If they are a professional political and member of the Democratic Party, and in Washington, they have bought into and are supporting the culture of transnational corporations as their real constituents. Their only problem with this is that corporations don't vote, and politicians need votes to get into office. So they, Democratic politicians, try to convince the People they're working on our behalf with weasel-words, rhetoric designed to lead voters into thinking one thing when the opposite is true. Obama can say, "I got health insurance for the People", but having health insurance isn't what Americans wanted and isn't what Democratic voters put Obama and Democrats into power to get for them. Having health insurance isn't the same thing as everyone being able to get affordable, quality medical treatment. Democrats in both chambers of Congress work as a team. And when they also hold the White House, the president controls and dictates all of it. They identify what they hope to achieve (pro-corporate legislation) and then strategize how to get it while saving each other's hides with constituents come election time. Those in liberal districts get to talk a good game about being champions of the People, but when push comes to shove, if their votes are needed to cross over and k!ll liberal legislation (like a public option or access to abortion), the DNC will make sure they are covered come election time, with massive infusions of money into their campaign war chests and crushing any principled challenges to them from the left in their primaries. Here's an example of how they tag team us: Lynn Woolsey, head of the Progressive Caucus, likes to brag that she was the first to bring a resolution to end the war in Iraq. She, and congressional Democrats, and Obama, ran on ending the practice of paying for the wars through supplemental emergency spending bills, and putting the wars on budget (see why that is significant here). Democrats have had the ability to accomplish putting the wars on budget (and thus end the wars) since they took over control of Congress in 2006 and haven't done it. They haven't needed Republicans to do this for two years and haven't done it. As the head of the Progressive Caucus, Lynn Woolsey led 79 of the 82 members of the caucus to pledge that they would not vote for any healthcare reform legislation that didn't include a public option. Woolsey then led the 79 to renege on the pledge. Unbeknownst to Lynn Woolsey's constitutents (it was never reported in her district's newspapers­): Progressive Congresswoman Woolsey Endorses Pro-War Blue Dog Jane Harman Over Progressive Marcy Winograd Democrats have let Obama continue with just about all of Bush-Cheney's policies, and wars, and let Obama go Bush-Cheney even better, by letting Obama assert, unchallenged, that presidents have the right to kill Americans with no due process or oversight, push for 'preventive detention' and no transparency of anything a president asserts should be his secret. Democrats have abdicated their Constitutionally-required role of oversight of the executive branch; they failed to perform it during the Bush-Cheney administration, and still don't with one of their own in the White House. The problem is with the Democratic Party as a whole; primarying Obama (and/or running liberal candidates against imcumbent Democrats in primaries) isn't going to solve the problem, if it's even possible to solve it and save us all (if they haven't managed to game the entire system to keep them in place until we descend into banana republicanism).

I suppose if there are any real and true Democrats left in the DLC-controlled Democratic Party, they might stage a rebellion and a revolution within the party itself, but there's no role for the People in that (unless Democratic voters are willing to get active, join and participate in the Democratic Party en masse now). It's more likely that an internal purge (without the outside new blood of Democratic voters joining the party and becoming active internally within the party) would just be a bloodbath, leaving the Democratic Party in ruins. There's something to be said for that, but it would revitalize the Republican Party, by driving the DLC Democrats to the Republican Party, swamping and taking over the GOP from the extreme rightwingers controlling it now. That may be the only way for a viable third party, encompassing the values and ideology of the left, to emerge and become viable.

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP