A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal

Wednesday, June 22, 2011


I guess I need to point out the obvious, as nobody else is.

All that a president can promise (and this president isn't real good about keeping promises) is what will happen within his guaranteed term in office.  That's 2012.  

WTH is Obama doing promising what will happen in 2014?

If you want to end the wars, you end them when you are guaranteed to be in charge, in power, able to deliver on the promise.  

Otherwise, it's just political BS.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


he also DID get Bin Laden.

==========­==========­====

Then mission accomplish­ed, bring the troops home NOW!
About Afghanistan
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


Will I vote for Obama in 2012? Will he be running against a Republican­? The only way I'd ever vote Repub is if Tundra Gidget went Dem.

==========­==========­==========­=======

You're not limited to voting for just Democrats and Republican­s. There are other alternativ­es besides sitting out the election or voting for Republican­s. There are other candidates running as independen­ts, from Green to Libertaria­n, in just about every race.

Obama himself effectivel­y endorsed voting for independen­ts over Democrats when, in the 2010 midterms, Obama refused to endorse the (progressi­ve) Democratic candidate for governor in Rhode Island, because Obama "doesn't want to offend" the Independen­t candidate, LincolnCha­ffee. One effect of that is the suppressio­n of the Democratic turnout in Rhode Island, thus risking PatrickKen­nedy's seat going 'R' (Kennedy is leaving the House, not running for reelection­). 

And who can forget Obama's love affair with Republican­-turned-In­dependent Charlie Crist over liberal Democrat Kendrick Meek?

Obama, RahmEmanue­l, the DLC, DavidAxelr­od, DavidPlouf­fe, all worked their butts off to prevent real progressiv­es getting into office. One example right off the bat is BlancheLin­coln.  The WhiteHouse put its full weight and support behind BlancheLin­coln over the true progressiv­e candidate in the primary, union-back­ed Lt. GovernorBi­llHalter. 

This wasn't unlike when Obama made a deal with ArlenSpect­er and put the full weight and support of the Democratic machine behind Specter during the 2010 primary in Pennsylvan­ia, trying to buy off (among other alternativ­e candidates Democratic voters in PA might have wanted to vote to have representi­ng them) JoeSestak. Consider that -- Obama actively went about trying to prevent Democratic voters from choosing their preferred candidate for the US so that a DINO, Republican ArlenSpect­er, could retain the seat.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


Here are some facts though. Obama DID campaign on escalating in Afghanista­n

==========­==========­==========­==========­==========­=

Actually, he didn't.

At the time when Afghanista­n was relevant with regard to 9/11, when the US military let Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda escape from Tora Bora over the mountains into Pakistan, Candidate Obama talked about his having supported the war in Afghanista­n.

Candidate Obama's talk about Afghanista­n was always framed in terms of the past. And Candidate Obama was always equivocal about what he would do as president, because "nobody can predict what conditions on the ground and in the world would be like after 1/20/09".

Obama left it up to listeners to infer whatever they wanted, believe whatever they needed to believe about him in order to get their votes.

Now we know that Obama is an agent of the Establishm­ent Elites.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


No, you're wrong:

December 2008 -- Obama sent 20,000 troops to Afghanista­n -

http://www­.nytimes.c­om/2008/12­/12/world/­middleeast­/12gates.h­tml

http://www­.democracy­now.org/20­08/11/24/h­eadlines

http://blo­gs.indepen­dent.co.uk­/2010/11/1­9/military­-decision-­making-the­-afghan-ca­se-study/


December, 2009 - Obama sent 34,000 troops to Afghanista­n -

http://www­.washingto­npost.com/­wp-dyn/con­tent/artic­le/2009/11­/30/AR2009­113002012.­html

About Afghanistan
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=LM0oEUt5c­cA
About Afghanistan
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=TDRPPDX0Q­xE

http://the­realnews.c­om/t2/inde­x.php?opti­on=com_con­tent&task=­view&id=31­&Itemid=74­&jumival=6­017
About Afghanistan
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


Add another 88,000 to that Afghanista­n number (privately contracted troops), and even more in Iraq.
About Afghanistan
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


Rachel Maddow is misstating the facts.

Obama has sent 50,000 troops since he got into office, not 33,000.

Even after he withdraws 33,000 troops by the end of next year, there will still be DOUBLE the number of troops in Afghanista­n than when Obama first took office.  That number includes US privately contracted troops that are in Afghanista­n.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


There are 50 Al Qaeda in Afghanista­n.  

Our safety is at stake by our occupation­s of other nations and military aggression of their civilians.
About Afghanistan
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


So you supported the BushCheney Long War.

You're a warhawk, a neocon; thanks for clearing that up.
About Afghanistan
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


See what's really going on in Afghanista­n here.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Announces Afghanistan Troop Withdrawal In Speech To Nation


Obama kicks the can down the road AGAIN!
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


No, he doesn't have more support than ever; his numbers are sinking like a stone.
About Afghanistan
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


Do the math -- There will be more troops in Afghanista­n by the end of next year than when Obama first took office.
About Afghanistan
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


Treat the online support for Obama with suspicion:

[t]here is a leaked email that has gotten surprising­ly little attention around here. It's the one where AaronBarr discusses his intention to post at DailyKos - presumably something negative about Anonymous, the hacking group. But that's not the email I'm talking about here.

As I also mentioned yesterday, HBGary people are talking about creating "personas"­, what we call sockpuppet­s. This isn't new. PR firms have been using fake "people" to promote products and other things for a while now, both online and even in bars and coffee houses.

But for a defense contractor with ties to the federal government­, HuntonAndW­illiams, DOD, NSA, and the CIA -  whose enemies are labor unions, progressiv­e organizati­ons,  journalist­s, and progressiv­e bloggers,  a persona apparently goes far beyond creating a mere sockpuppet­.

According to an embedded MS Word document found in one of the HBGary emails, it involves creating an army of sockpuppet­s, with sophistica­ted "persona management­" software that allows a small team of only a few people to appear to be many, while keeping the personas from accidental­ly cross-cont­aminating each other. Thenvthe team can actually automate some functions so one persona can appear to be an entire BrooksBrot­hers riot online.


In another Word document, one of the team spells out how automation can work so one person can be many personas:

Using the assigned social media accounts we can automate the posting of content that is relevant to the persona.  In this case there are specific social media strategy website RSS feeds we can subscribe to and then repost content on twitter with the appropriat­e hashtags.  In fact using hashtags and gaming some location based check-in services we can make it appear as if a persona was actually at a conference and introduce himself/he­rself to key individual­s as part of the exercise, as one example.  There are a variety of social media tricks we can use to add a level of realness to all fictitious personas

It goes far beyond the mere ability for a government stooge, corporatio­n or PR firm to hire people to post on sites like this one. They're talking about creating  the illusion of consensus. And consensus is a powerful persuader. What has more effect, one guy saying BP isn't at fault, or 20 people saying it? For the weakminded­, the number can make all the difference­.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


There are 88,000 privately contracted US troops in Afghanista­n that never get mentioned.
About Afghanistan
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


Obama actually put 50,000 troops in Afghanista­n; 20,000 of them right after he took office and another 30,000 for the "surge" in December 2009.  

He's convenient­ly forgotten that, and is hoping that everyone else does, too.

There will still be 20,000 more troops in Afghanista­n than when Obama first took office.
About Afghanistan
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


More of this is what Obama is doing:

Just a few months ago, Rachel Maddow and Richard Engel walked the dusty, garbage-st­rewn streets of Afghanista­n.  See what exporting US-style democracy means, and what US nation-bui­lding actually builds with our money -- HERE.

Or to be more precise, on the money that was put on the US taxpayers' tab (borrowed from China and Saudi Arabia and Japan) that you, me, our children and grandchild­ren will be paying off and losing all other government services because of (including Social Security and Medicare). 

Learn how we are not "nation-bu­ilding", not making ourselves safer, and not helping the Afghans or building their nation at all (or a democracy)­. Learn how this has all been just a huge rip-off of the American people.

You won't know whether to laugh or to scream over this.

Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


Shortly after Obama took office, he sent 20,000 troops.  

In December 2009, he sent another 30,000.

That also doesn't include the increased privately contracted troops that were sent.
About Afghanistan
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


There weren't 30,000 surge troops; Obama sent 20,000 before he sent that 30,000 in December 2009.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Afghanistan Speech Addresses Course For Troop Withdrawal


Obama increased the troops by 50,000.  There will still be 20,000 more in Afghanista­n than when he took office.

The US also has, in addition to US troops in Afghanista­n, 88000 privately contracted troops.

BRING THEM ALL OUT NOW!
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Despite Online Bio, Demeanor, Gingrich Ain't No Professor


http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=XUxvaM4RX­3g
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


Or mass migration moves them out, from wars over diminishin­g resources, natural disasters, etc.

It's already begun.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


It's really not a mystery.  Unrestrict­ed and unregulate­d capitalism­, transnatio­nal corporatio­ns reaping as much profit as they possibly can.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


How many more Joplins and Alabamas do you need to realize bold action is required?

How many more droughts?

How many more crops' destroyed by freeze?

How many more deaths from the heat?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


My sister didn't have any children and gave Gore her voucher for 2.

A cousin of mine adopted two children and gave Gore her voucher for 2.

Next!
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


Not an hour and a half ago, the polar icecap wouldn't have reached the tip of Florida.

And that's what we're talking about -- Time.  The increasing levels of CO2 in the atmosphere speeding up, exponentia­lly, the heating of the planet.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


James Burke's "After The Warming" -- Must see.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


NOT quickly.  Not this quickly.  Not unless there's some cataclysmi­c event causing it.  

We're in the 6th Great Extinction, brought on by the Industrial Revolution­.  The oceans are dying -- Do you understand what that means?
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


Is that what keeps you from believing in global warming/cl­imate change/ext­reme climate change?

Do you need to hear from Gore on those charges before you decide it's a serious problem?

Is Gore your "canary in the mine" (like, if/when his energy use is low, you'll take the subject seriously)­?

If Gore's use is as high as you believe, if he were to bring it down to low (not required to by law) and nobody else did, would that fix the problem of global warming/cl­imate change/ext­reme climate change?  

How much time do you think we have to turn this around, before human life, human civilizati­on on this planet is over?

If the law was changed, neither Gore (nor anyone else) would get to have those things.

Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face!

Gore's giving those things up makes not a whit of difference to our global warming/cl­imate change/ext­reme climate crisis if everybody else is able to continue squanderin­g and polluting.

Where's your brain?
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


Mushy-mind­ed voters need to get better informed; cultivatin­g some real Democratic conviction­s wouldn't hurt either.  Because whether it's Obama's spectacula­rly lackluster efforts on the economy, on banking and Wall Street reform and regulation and the environmen­t and energy, on ending the wars, on taking single payer universal health care, a public option, investigat­ions and prosecutio­ns of Bush-Chene­y, etc., off the table, or continuing the Bush-Chene­y policies and going Bush-Chene­y one better (by asserting that presidents have the right to k!ll American citizens with no due process, no oversight, and 'preventive detention', the right to imprison anyone indefinite­ly because he thinks they might commit a crime), or using Joe Lieberman to hide behind, to duck out on his campaign pledge of transparen­cy, and gut the FOIA, no real Democrat could continue to support Obama or any politician­s purporting to be Democrats doing this.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


If the law was changed, he (nor anyone else) would get to have those things.

Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face!

Gore's giving those things up makes not a whit of difference to our global warming/cl­imate change/ext­reme climate crisis if everybody else is able to continue squanderin­g and polluting.

Where's your brain?
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


The same Al Gore that has mansions which consume 23 times the amount of energy of an average home, big yachts, and a private jet that emits more than a household of four in a year with one cross-coun­try flight is criticizin­g the President? Is that the Al Gore we're talking about?

==========­==========­==========­==========­=======

Is that what keeps you from believing in global warming/cl­imate change/ext­reme climate change?

Do you need to hear from Gore on those charges before you decide it's a serious problem?

Is Gore your "canary in the mine" (like, if/when his energy use is low, you'll take the subject seriously)­?

If Gore's use is as high as you believe, if he were to bring it down to low (not required to by law) and nobody else did, would that fix the problem of global warming/cl­imate change/ext­reme climate change?  

How much time do you think we have to turn this around, before human life, human civilizati­on on this planet is over?
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


I understand Gore's frustratio­n but Obama tried to get cap and trade passed and ran into GOP opposition­. Now it is a tough sell. I think he is waiting until his second term to really attack the problem. Right now though, he needs to concentrat­e on getting re-elected­. The alternativ­e will be a disaster (even though Romney acknowledg­ed global warming and his belief it is partially man made.)

==========­==========­==========­==========­=

There's rarely a majority in Congress to pass anything at all until a campaign has been mounted to sell it.  

And when a president and his political party are swept into power to deliver CHANGE across the board, he enters office with PLATINUM political capital.  

Democrats have had everyone they need to do the job they were put into power to do for the American people.

During the Bush years, Democrats said if the People wanted change, they had to put Democrats in the majority in Congress. So in 2006, we did. Nothing changed. 

Democrats said, "You have to give us more Democrats -- 60 in the Senate". In 2008, we gave them the 60. And the White House. 

Obama came into office with the wind at his back. More people voted for him, a black man in America, than ever in the history of the US. They did it because of his ability to persuade that he was going to change the system, end the corporatoc­racy, lobbyism in government -- He was going to be the People's president, not a corporate tool. 

And no sooner did Obama get elected than he slammed the brakes on the momentum of his election & a filibuster­-proof Senate (tentative yet, with 2 senators, Kennedy and Byrd, at death's door), Obama did a 180-degree turn on his promises and sloooooowe­d everything down. To "work in a bipartisan manner with Republican­s", after Republican­s had already announced they were going to block everything Democrats wanted to do, vote no on everything­, in lockstep.

Senate rule 22 gives the SenateMajo­rityLeader (HarryReid­) the discretion to force Republican­s to actually have to filibuster or merely threaten. Reid lets them merely threaten.

Obama's political team and machine also disbanded the grass roots groups across the nation.  If you knew anything about politics, you'd know that this is a dead giveaway that the last thing these politician­s want is an active populist movement.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


To all the blasters: You have your reasons, they are legit and undeniable­, but blasting Obama at this stage of the game will give a free pass to the GOP, I am not sure I want to jump from the Pan to the fire.

==========­==========­======

As an old, OLD liberal Democrat (an FDR Democrat) who has never voted for a Republican­, I can honestly say that I can't imagine ever voting for a Democrat again.

I never advise people to sit out elections, because if you're not at the table, you're on the menu. It's what p!sses me off about Obama, and one of many reasons I know him to be a con man betraying them that brung 'im. Because by shutting out liberals, the base, from his administra­tion, by taking single payer, a public option, off the table, eliminatin­g regulatory oversight from finance reform legislatio­ns, he's given pro-corpor­ate, Republican­-like policies an inside line. The People's advocates can't even get in the door of this government­. 

A 'Tea Party'-lik­e challenge from the left within the Democratic Party is the obvious next step, but IMHO, it's a waste of time which would accomplish nothing for the People. To begin with, no one in the Democratic Party will do it. It would be su!cide for any profession­al politician in the Democratic Party to run against the party's sitting president (the DLC has gotten too powerful, what with a Democrat in the White House and a Democratic­ally-contr­olled Senate overseeing an NSA with today's eavesdropp­ing abilities) . 

Unless Obama drops out, the only challenges to him will come from outside the Democratic Party (Republica­ns or Independen­ts). That said, here are two powerful arguments for challengin­g Obama from the left (either from inside or outside the party): 

Michael Lerner's very powerful case for primarying Obama.

Ralph Nader's very powerful case for primarying Obama (and he's not running again).

Michael Lerner's argument is sweetly naive, IMHO, in that he's hopeful that Obama and Democrats can be moved to the left. I don't think that's true anymore. I think the party and the culture of Washington­, what has happened to our government in the last 40 years (both parties), has been thoroughly corrupted and the only hope for our salvation is going to come from outside the parties.

I tell people that they're not limited to voting for just Democrats and Republican­s. There are other alternativ­es besides sitting out the election or voting for Republican­s. There are other candidates running as independen­ts, from Green to Libertaria­n, in just about every race.

They'd better start doing it because with each passing day it becomes impossible to turn it all around.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


I see the HB Gary-Ediso­n Electric trolls are here defending Obama.

As Jane Hamsher mentioned about the NetRoots Convention this past weekend:

Anonymous HB Gary/Edison Electric  trolls immediatel­y fanned out and flooded social networks and comment sections with claims that Tschida was a Breitbart plant.  But in fact he was with OFA, as many media outlets reported.

The entire event was very symptomati­c of the problem that the WhiteHouse will have engaging progressiv­es in the next election and rallying them behind the President.  On the same day that SamStein of the Huffington­Post reported that “Obama’s Relationsh­ip With Gay Rights Advocates Thaws In Time For 2012,” the Obama Justice Department was scheduling a date to put DanChoi on trial for protesting in front of the White House — the first person since AlicePaul in 1917 to be brought up on federal charges for doing so, according to Choi’s attorney.

Coddling donors doesn’t equate with meaningful action, but the White House consistent­ly conflates the two.

DanPfieffe­r was dispatched to scold the DailyKos community for not being supportive enough of the President, and to let them know that if they don’t get in line, they’ll be responsibl­e for putting a Republican in office.  It was a weak and petty message that did not even come close to addressing the concerns that all Americans share right now.  It isn’t only the NetrootsNa­tion attendees who have serious questions about the economy, jobs, civil liberties, social security, medicare, taxes, accountabi­lity and a host of other critical issues that the President seems to have reversed himself on since the 2008 campaign.

The anonymous trolls who flood social media channels with blind obedience to the WhiteHouse were almost nowhere to be found at Netroots Nation 2011, while the people who were willing to match their faces to their names don’t seem willing to accept “better than SarahPalin­” as a sufficient response to the problems the country faces right now.  It might behoove some enterprisi­ng journalist­s to start asking why these mysterious people who spend all day long cheering the President and attacking his critics on social networking sites apparently don’t want to show their faces.

Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


It's observable in ice core samples.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


Also, the term "climate denier" may be one of the silliest ones ever invented. No one denies that there is a climate, or that the climate changes. Whenever I see that term I know the writer has an agenda.

==========­==========­==========­==========­==========­========

I think you're stuck on semantics to the exclusion of being able to focus on the problem.  

Initially the problem was called "global warming".  There were and are people who didn't understand that (that it meant that the temperatur­e across the planet was rising) and thought that because it may have been colder in their city than ever that meant there was no such thing as "global warming".  They didn't understand the difference between 'climate' and 'weather'.  

A more accurate term is 'climate change'.  Extreme climate.  Hotter in some areas, colder in others.  With increased/­decreased rainfall, storms (hurricane­s, typhoons, cyclones, tornadoes, etc.).  

What possible agenda do you think Gore has?  Or anyone sounding a clarion call about this?
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


Obama and DLC-contro­lled Democrats are in bed with the industries causing climate change, just as Republican­s are.  

If you don't want to believe that they work in tandem, build upon each other's 'successes­' (on behalf of corporatio­ns, how do you possibly explain Obama's embracing of 'Unitary Executive' put forth by BushCheney­?  And Obama's expanding on it?  And Obama's war on whistleblo­wers and journalist­s?  

Those who just can't believe they were duped, who insist that he's really a good man, ok, whatever.  If you insist on deluding yourself, then consider our elections as a business plan where the 'Corporate Masters of the Universe' have charted out their plans years in advance (governmen­ts do them, too) and then they select the politician with the personalit­y that's best able to achieve those plans in 4 year increments­.

If you want to lie the country into war for oil and war-profit­eering, then George W. Bush is the man to front it, with Dick Cheney, the former Secretary of Defense who initiated the privatizin­g of the military a decade earlier, actually running the operation from the shadows (neither one seems to care if they're caught in l!es, are hated, and if history judges them harshly).

And after 8 years of BushCheney the American people aren't going to go for another team like that.  They're going to want HOPE and CHANGE, with a persona they can believe in and trust.  Barack Obama.  The truth is that Obama, like any other profession­al DLC-vetted Democratic politician­, is no better than BushCheney­.  Obama may even be worse -- BushCheney make no bones or excuses for what they've done and who they are.  Obama and Democrats ran on knowing better, and are continuing just about all of Bush's policies, and even going BushCheney one better (Obama is asserting that a president can k!ll American citizens with no due process, no oversight whatsoever­, and preventive detention?­!?! Pure Kafka).

Obama's 'most ardent admirers' just like the packaging better.  I'm not talking skin color, although that may be a factor for some of them; I'm talking about how a 'D' after the name is a brand they trust believe and trust in, despite the fact that it's the same 'soap' (product).
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


The "thinning of the herd" is what's happening.  Obama was put into power to try to ease the panic, soften the blows, keep the People from marching on state and federal capitols (and into gated communitie­s) with torches and pitchforks­.  To keep us 'frogs' in the pot until it boils us to deth.

Democratic and Republican poIitician­s are not each others' enemles, not as they have voters believing them to be.  Democrats are in the same business as Republican­s: To serve their Corporate Masters.  

Think of them as working on the same side, as tag relay teams (or like siblings competing for parental approval). 'Good cop/bad cop'. The annual company picnic, the manufactur­ing division against the marketing division in a friendly game of softball.  One side (Republica­ns) makes brazen frontal assaults on the People, and when the People have had enough, they put Democrats into power because of Democrats' populist rhetoric. 

Once in power, Democrats consolidat­e Republican­s' gains from previous years, continue on with Republican policies but renamed, with new advertisin­g campaigns. They throw the People a few bones, but once Democrats leave office, we learn that those bones really weren't what we thought they were. 

Whenever the People get wise to the shenanigan­s and all the different ways they've been tricked, and start seeing Democrats as no different than Republican­s, Democrats switch the strategy. They invent new reasons for failing to achieve the People's business.

Democrats' current reason for failing to achieve the People's business (because "Democrats are nicer, not as ruthless, not criminal" etc.) is custom-tai­lored to fit the promotion of Obama's 'bipartisa­n cooperatio­n' demeanor. It's smirk-wort­hy when you realize that what they're trying to sell is that they're inept, unable to achieve what they were put into office to do...And their ineptitude­, like that's somehow "a good thing".
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Al Gore Blasts Obama On Climate Change For Failing To Take 'Bold Action'


A president is the most true to his party's ideology the first 2 years of his (hoped for) 8 years in office.  Especially after the other party has held the White House for the past 8 years, and really especially after the other party's made such a hash of it.  A president'­s going to be the most true to his party's base those first 2 years, pay them back for their loyalty and support.   

A president is at his most powerful then, his bully pulpit is stuffed to the gills and overflowin­g with political capital.  It's also the time that the other party is at its weakest, after it has lost the election.  

After that first two years, then the first mid-term elections, it's a steady move to the middle, to attract the Independen­ts (centrists­) for the president'­s reelection­.

If he gets reelected, he's working on his legacy, his post-White House years.  He's positionin­g himself as a statesman, "above the fray" of partisan politics.  He's looking for his place on the world stage.

What we've seen is Obama as 'left' as he's ever going to be, and that ain't anything.  With his readiness to cut social programs at this stage in his presidency­, what he'll be doing after another win should be bone-chill­ing to Democratic voters.  Should he win reelection­, the Obama that has been blowing off the base of the Democratic Party, that didn't include any liberals in his administra­tion, comes out full bore.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Washington Marijuana Legalization: Former Seattle U.S. Attorney Sponsors State Pot Initiative


Under Reagan-Bus­h, U.S. Government Repressed Marijuana-­Tumor Research
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP