This FAA Sequester Vote Doesn't Smell Right
Sunday, April 28, 2013
I'm an old OLD liberal DEMOCRAT. I've never voted for a Republican in my life, never will, and the way things are going I'll never be voting for another Democrat again.
No offense, but Democratic supporters like you are no different than (and just as ignorant on the issues as) Bushies. Obama's 'most ardent supporters' aren't following the day-to-day intricacies that have taken place over these past years in Washington (and Obama's participation) - It seems as if they go to HuffPo as they would the sports page (or as Republican supporters watch only Fox). Those of us who read the legislation and follow the day-to-day details of sausage-making know that these two parties work together to deliver to the 1%, and their only real conflict is over who is to get the credit/blame (with both their corporate masters and their party's base).
How does "extreme Republican partisanship" cause a Democratic president to offer Social Security and Medicare benefits' cuts?
How does "extreme Republican partisanship" cause a Democratic president to offer across-the-board sequestration that cuts off cancer patients from treatment and kids from Headstart?
How does "extreme Republican partisanship" get a Democratic president to sign off on easing sequestration pain on the upper and corporate classes without (again) lifting sequestration pain also on those most vulnerable (children, the poor and the infirm)?
Obama's either the worst negotiator in the history of the world (in which case he can't be "the smartest/the most adult/the greatest") or he's a DINO (Democrat in name only), a skillful conniving Trojan Horse put into office having tricked voters like you who think he's a populist working on behalf of the 98%.
NEWSFLASH for you - In Obama's own words, he's a Reagan Republican: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2r-emodk73w
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
