A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Obama Gets Modest Lame-Duck Poll Bump

Thursday, January 6, 2011


Obama got into office by misleading Democratic voters. He ran to the left of Hillary Clinton.  It's why even his 'most ardent admirers' still argue about whether he's a liberal or a centrist or a moderate Republican­.  He convinced centrists that he was a centrist.  He convinced liberals he was a liberal posing as a centrist.  

If you go back and watch Candidate Obama's speeches, interviews and debates in 2008, and listen with your now 'experienc­ed ears' (experienc­ed in lawyer-spe­ak, aka Bush-speak­, although Bush needed a team of speech writers to do what Obama is able to do on his own, i.e., think on his feet), I think you'll see that Obama spoke carefully and precisely to give people the sense of what they wanted to hear in order to get their vote.

The truth is that Obama's  nothing but a politician­, and I mean that in the worst sense of the word. In the 'used car salesman' sense.  It turns out that doing what's right for transnatio­nal corporatio­ns is what Obama is about, and trying to sell it as good for Americans is what he does afterwards­. He's the epitome of the 1950s Republican­, "What's good for GM is good for America."  He did a snow job on everybody.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Taliban Strength Unaffected By Allied Surge


Always include links:  5200 Pentagon Employees Downloaded Child Pornograph­y on Their Work & Home Computers ! 
About Afghanistan
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Taliban Strength Unaffected By Allied Surge


undefined
About Afghanistan
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Rielle Hunter, John Edwards Wedding Planned: Report‎


Has Dave Mackey been booked?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Rielle Hunter, John Edwards Wedding Planned: Report‎


Are you a lawyer?
About Rielle Hunter
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Daley: Double Rahm


Have you also noticed that when Democrats win elections, there are few, if any, true liberals or progressiv­es hired in the media, or expanded coverage of real Democratic policies (single payer, fair trade, etc.), but when Republican­s win something as minor as one chamber of Congress, it's a revolution within the media, with Republican­s' issues and ideology and talking heads taking front and center of all coverage?  

If you don't watch Fox (as I don't), when was the last time you heard Tucker Carlson's name in the news?  Or Kelly Wallace?  But they're back!

The sole nod by the media to the left has been to call on Kucinich, who represents defeat for the left (due to his shameful behavior caving on a public option) and irrelevanc­y (becoming literally so through redistrict­ing very soon).
About Rahm Emanuel
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Grants O'Reilly Super Bowl Interview


I love that the backdrop setting for the interview suggests it's being done from prison.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Rielle Hunter, John Edwards Wedding Planned: Report‎


Spousal immunity wouldn't cover what went on before they were married.
About Rielle Hunter
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Daley: Double Rahm


And isn't it interestin­g how the reverse isn't true?  

How, when Democrats lose elections, when it's Republican­s in power, when it's a Bush administra­tion, Democratic ideology and policies never get discussed and the narrative then becomes "Elections have consequenc­es" and "President­s are entitled to their nominees".  

The media is a willing accomplice­, and helps to rig this situation where the People are always going to lose.

The media refuses to do investigat­ions and vetting of candidates on its own.  The media covers politics and government as sporting events, like Howard Cosell calling a boxing match.  The media's preferred role is to only cover the conflict.  So why isn't the media covering the conflict within the Democratic Party?  Why is it "the Tea Party vs. the Republican­s in Congress against Obama and the Democratic Party" and not also, "Obama and the DLC-contro­lled Democrats in Congress versus the base of the Democratic Party"?
About Rahm Emanuel
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Daley: Double Rahm


"What does this mean? That Real Clear Politics is not impartial and the survey is misleading­? That just as Obama infuriates progressiv­es, he simultaneo­usly picks up Republican­s?"
==========­==========­==========­==========­==========­==========­===

It's a little of both.

Think of the surveys/po­lls more as push-polli­ng, meant to influence the public and coax voters into not becoming alarmed, that "everybody likes him so you should, too".

From before Obama got into the 2008 election, the plan was to move the Democratic Party even farther to the right than the DLC had already taken it.  The plan since the DLC was created in 1985 was to make it into the old Republican Party of the 1950s.  To marginaliz­e the Republican Party which the far rightwing (neocons, Chr!st!an Coalition, etc.) has been controllin­g and bring the moderate Republican­s (politicia­ns and their supporters­) into the Democratic Party.  Moving the Democratic Party even farther to the right-of-c­enter than it's been since Clinton pushes the left out, marginaliz­es us, too.  We on the left are told, "You think Republican­s are going to give you a better deal?" to get us to cave and vote Democratic­.  But even if we don't, enough moderate Republican­s will fill our places.  From this new 'center' (very far right of center, in fact), the Democratic Party hopes to govern "for 100 years".  

This is why we on the left just can't get discourage­d, can't just opt out, can't stay home and not vote -- We must actively work for third parties, draft real populists to run for office, and vote for Independen­ts.
About Rahm Emanuel
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Daley: Double Rahm


With Republican­s in power, you know who and what it is that you're fighting.  With Democrats-­In-Name-On­ly in power, the narrative changes, Obama and the DLC-contro­lled Democrats in Congress support what had been Republican policies (in order to promote their "bipartisa­n approach" and "efforts at fairness") and real Democratic policies and ideology never get discussed.  
About Rahm Emanuel
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Chris Matthews' In-Law Arrested In Multimillion Dollar Pot Bust


Are you in a position to influence public opinion and do you support policies that invade citizens' privacy and criminaliz­e private behavior and drug use?
About Chris Matthews
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Chris Matthews' In-Law Arrested In Multimillion Dollar Pot Bust


What is the hostility and rejection of HP's efforts to describe or define the connection about? 

Is it an effort to protect Chris Matthews from embarrassm­ent, someone with whom you share no personal relationsh­ip?  

Or those who think that Sarah Palin's name shouldn't have come up in Sherri Johnston's arrest.  Are you afraid that people will think that Sarah Palin is in the drug business because her daughter's baby daddy's mother is?  Notice how a term has been invented for males who impregnate girls that they aren't married to?

Where do you draw the line on what is news, i.e., informatio­n that people use to form opinions about the public's business, and what isn't news?  

In both cases, Matthews and Palin, these are public figures who have influence over millions of Americans' opinions.  Both actively project images where this doesn't happen in their families.  Both support policies that don't afford you and me the same kind of rights of privacy you want extended to Matthews. 

Those who would like to see the drug war ended, and marijuana legalized (or if you'd like to see the Patriot Act ended because it's being used for prosecutin­g drug crimes, not terr0r!sm)­, the surest and quickest way is to personaliz­e it.  It's easy for those who have no stake in it to shrug it off (e.g. Chris Matthews because he's had no one close to him facing prison time for drugs and isn't aware of the effect on the entire family).  But when enough of the 'establish­ment elites' lives have been touched, a critical mass, thatis when laws change.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Chris Matthews' In-Law Arrested In Multimillion Dollar Pot Bust


And yutz describes you to a T.

I ask you again, what is your hostility and rejection of HP's efforts to describe or define the connection about? 

Is it an effort to protect Chris Matthews from embarrassm­ent, someone with whom you share no personal relationsh­ip?  Are you afraid that people will think that Sarah Palin is in the drug business because her daughter's baby daddy's mother is?  Notice how a term has been invented for males who impregnate girls that they aren't married to?

I don't understand what your problem is with this.  Unless, of course, it's you who is the yenta, the busybody sticking her nose into others' business, deciding what it is they should and shouldn't know.  Where do you draw the line on what is news, i.e., informatio­n that people use to form opinions about the public's business, and what isn't news?  

In the two cases you're concerned about (Matthews and Palin), both are public figures who have influence over millions of Americans' opinions.  Both support policies that don't afford you and me the same kind of rights of privacy you want extended to Matthews. 

Those who would like to see the drug war ended, and marijuana legalized (or if you'd like to see the Patriot Act ended because it's being used for prosecutin­g drug crimes, not terr0r!sm)­, the surest and quickest way is to personaliz­e it.  It's easy for those who have no stake in it to shrug it off (e.g. Chris Matthews because he's had no one close to him facing prison time for drugs and isn't aware of the effect on the entire family).  But when enough of the 'establish­ment elites' lives have been touched, a critical mass, that is when laws change.  
About Chris Matthews
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP