According to whom?
Your bloodthirst is interfering with your American values. If you ever had any.
What makes the US stand out from all other nations, what made people from other nations want to come to the US, were our laws that required the government to prove their case instead of requiring people to prove their innocense.
About Civil Rights
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
That's you're opinion.
My opinion (and obviously someone else's who fav'ed it) disagrees with your opinion.
I'm sorry that you can't see the connection. I really am sorry about that, because your inability to comprehend it is k!lling us all.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
He's treasonous according to whom?
Who's got the proof?
Has a court of law determined his guilt?
About Civil Rights
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Due process.
Learn what it means.
You can't be a patriotic American without supporting that most basic, fundamental Constitutional right.
About Civil Rights
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
What if it's you?
What if the administration in power at the time decides that you are a threat to it and orders you to be k!lled without due process?
Would you object to the ACLU suing that administration to abide by the Constitution?
About Civil Rights
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Only if you're myopic.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
It's not support that causes Obama to do that.
It's falling support for his Republican-like, pro-Bush policies that does that.
When are you going to hold Obama accountable? When are you going to demand that Obama open a complete investigation into the BushAdministration lies to war, torture policy & human rights violations; force the government to stop the sneak & peek practices against American citizens under penalty of felony charges for all involved; publish an executive order forbidding phone companies to cooperate with wiretapping without a legal court order; issue sanctions saying that non-compliance will be criminally prosecuted & grant civil reparations to people whose rights have been violated; pressure Congress to repeal the Patriot Act in it's entirety; disband the Department of Homeland Security; remove all military personal from Iraq; order the withdrawal all American military from Afghanistan; stop all offensive operations; tell Harry Reid to force Republicans to filibuster or remove fillibuster procedures from the Senate rules; get Americans REAL healthcare reform?
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
F & F'ed.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
You're either brain-de@d, dearie, or you're a political activist paid to spin BS online.
56,000 troops plus thousands of clandestine private contractors isn't "got our troops out of Iraq".
I suspect you're a paid operative, because if you were legit, you'd be outraged that Obama has given Bush a pass. No investigations, no prosecutions.
No real Democrat should be standing still for what Obama and the DLC are doing.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Obama's no better than Bush-Cheney.
Over the course of US history, corporations have managed to game our political system, and done it so effectively that the two-party system competes to serve corporate interests while defending that service as, "What's good for GM (corporations) is good for America (We the People)".
DLC Democrats who control the Democratic Party and Republicans are corporate t00Is. Like siblings competing for the attention and approval (campaign contributions) of a parent, Republicans and DLC-controlled Democrats try to outdo each other in delivering for their real constituent, Big Corporations. The trick for them has been to make it seem as if they were really working on behalf of We the People.
Democratic voters have mistakenly believed that Obama&Democrats were for strong regulations on banks, Wall Street, investigations, prosecutions, restitution of what has been robbed from the middle class and poor for the past 30+ years, environmental clean-up, clean, sustainable renewable energy (& that isn't nuclear), putting an end to the wars and occupation of Iraq & Afghanistan, affordable, quality universal healthcare (which ObamaCare is not), and more. The DLC-controlled Democratic party gives lip service to these & all populist issues, because like the Republican Party, the DLC works for the benefit of transnational corporations.
Unless & until there is drastic and uncompromising change to our campaign financing system, until corporations are no longer 'persons' and are prohibited from participating in elections and politics, all efforts to reform government are useless.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Yet Obama gives Bush and Cheney a free pass.
No investigations, no prosecutions.
Obama's a t00l, corporate through and through, just like Bush-Cheney.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Obama is continuing the wars; he's just moving them off the books.
Private contractors are handling combat in Iraq now.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
The fact of the matter is that all US troops need to return to the US.
But Iraq is a civil war at this point, with Iraqis and Americans being k!lled daily. That's not so for S. Korea, Japan, Germany, Italy, and the UK.
We haven't finished combat operations; private contractors have taken over combat operations.
Obama is just a continuation of the Bush administration and its policies.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Id-jit, if exterminators are using outdoor pesticides in residential and business buildings, it's a failure of enforcement of regulations.
You are why America is spiraling into oblivion.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Obama does plan to call Bush on Tuesday before delivering his Oval Office address, Gibbs said, though he wouldn't say what Obama's message to his predecessor would be. Obama also called Bush last year before delivering a speech laying out the Iraq withdrawal timeline.
==========
Anything other than, "You have the right to remain silent and refuse to answer questions. Do you understand? Anything you do say may be used against you in a court of law. Do you understand? You have the right to consult an attorney before speaking to the police and to have an attorney present during questioning now or in the future. Do you understand? If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you before any questioning if you wish. Do you understand? If you decide to answer questions now without an attorney present you will still have the right to stop answering at any time until you talk to an attorney. Do you understand? Knowing and understanding your rights as I have explained them to you, are you willing to answer my questions without an attorney present?" is a waste of our time and an affront to Americans' intelligence.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Regulatory failure. By Republicans, but Democrats svck, too (because of the DLC (DINOs) controlling the Democratic Party).
Signed,
An old, old, liberal Democrat
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
It is the PREsumption of innocence, not theASSumption of innocence. People are not innocent until proven guilty. They are either innocent or guilty, and according lawyers who have tried to explain this to me, one can assume a suspect is guilty simply because he or she has been arrested and arraigned. The presumption of innocence is an agreement to set aside one's own personal feelings or opinions, and judge the case based solely on the facts presented.
==========
What you've written is significantly muddled, but if you're saying that a person can be assumed (by whom?) to be guilty because she's been arrested, then no, that's not accurate.
The presumption of innocence (the principle that one is considered innocent until proven guilty) is a legal right of someone accused in a criminal trial.
The burden of proof is on the prosecution, which has to collect and present enough compelling evidence to convince the trier of fact (judge and/or jury), who is restrained and ordered by law to consider only actual evidence and testimony that is legally admissible, and in most cases lawfully obtained, that the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
In case of remaining doubts, the accused is to be acquitted.
But if you're not the judge or on the jury, you can PREsume or ASSume any d@mned thing you want.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
I'm not asking you to ignore suffering in Mississippi or anywhere else.
Whatever various scams you think you're aware of, I think you are missing the big picture in your haste to rush to Obama's defense. I provided links to information that might give you a different, if not broader, perspective. Check them out, or don't; what you do matters not to me.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
What is this adminstration doing to restore the barrier islands and coastal wetlands of southern Louisiana.
==========
Obama's leaving it to BP.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
© Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008
Back to TOP
