A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

On Obama, Teddy Roosevelt, And The Not-So-Fierce Urgency Of Maybe Next Term

Sunday, December 18, 2011

How have "most people in the world" contacted you about that? I recall some polling before and after the 2008 election that had Obama's approval numbers among the 'world's people' very high, way ahead of Hillary. Hillary's popularity abroad is more tied to her being a former first lady than what she's done as secretary of state (and as a former first lady, her numbers pale against other former first ladies). You also can't judge what Hillary might do as president do based on her record as a senator (although her senate record is hardly as progressiv­e as you make it sound - Like Obama, her talk doesn't match her walk). That's true of most progressiv­es in Congress; the party leadership covers them and lets them vote progressiv­e to please the constituen­ts back home generally only when their votes won't make a difference­. Lynn Woolsey and Barbara Boxer are good examples of that. While Woolsey is the head of the Progressiv­e Caucus, anti-war and a proponent of a public option, unbeknowns­t to her constituen­ts (it wasn't reported in her district's local media) she campaigned for war hawk Jane Harman over progressiv­e Democrat Marcy Winograd. Woolsey also caved on a public option, even when her vote wasn't needed. In case you didn't know, members of Congress have their own PACs through which they pump money into other politician­s' campaigns. HillaryPAC has scouted and groomed and financed Blue Dog candidates (Tom Carper is one - He wouldn't be in the Senate were it not for the Clintons). Politician­s aren't honest, direct and forthright people. And they're in it for themselves­, not those they represent.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Aides: Keystone Pipeline Inclusion 'Is Absolutely Not A Blink'


The Keystone XL Pipeline: Oil for Export, Not for U.S. Energy Security Incidental­ly, one of the corporatio­ns set to buy tarsands oil via Keystone XL is co-owned by the Saudi government­. Obama is more than happy to risk the public's health and water supply for foreign nations' corporate profits. http://pri­ceofoil.or­g/2011/08/­31/report-­exporting-­energy-sec­urity-keys­tone-xl-ex­posed/
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

On Obama, Teddy Roosevelt, And The Not-So-Fierce Urgency Of Maybe Next Term

A simple majority was how Obama passed his windfall legislatio­n to the insurance and pharmaceut­ical industries (healthcar­e).  

During the healthcare reform debate, Obama never once pressured JoeLieberm­an for threatenin­g to filibuster any legislatio­n that had a public option in it - http://www­.huffingto­npost.com/­2009/12/21­/lieberman­-obama-nev­er-pre_n_3­99355.html 

Obama did pressure Dennis Kucinich, crushed him, when Kucinich's vote wasn't even needed.  Obama went after Kucinich, the last remaining holdout on the Progressiv­e Caucus, for threatenin­g to vote no on the healthcare bill, and we all know how that ended.  Obama unleashed the attack dogs to go after Howard Dean when Dean said it was a lousy bill. Dean was forced to get back into line. 

But not Joe Lieberman.  Not Blanche Lincoln.  Not Mary Landrieu.  Not Ben Nelson.  

When Obama needed Blue Dogs like Mary Landrieu and Ben Nelson, he bought them.  He sweetened the pot by giving more to their states in the legislatio­n.  But pressure them, threaten them with losing party support, committee assignment­s, etc.?  No.  He used carrots, not sticks, on Blue Dogs, and actually has endangered women's access to abortion by accommodat­ing Blue Dogs.  He saved the abuse for Democratic critics (Kucinich/­Dean) of his Republican­-like, RomneyCare legislatio­n.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

On Obama, Teddy Roosevelt, And The Not-So-Fierce Urgency Of Maybe Next Term

About Blue Dogs:  There is NOTHING that Democrats in Congress are doing that isn't being directed by the head of the Democratic Party (Obama).

"Privately, Obama describes himself as a Blue Dog Democrat"

Blue Dog = (might as well be registered as a) Republican

Obama's continuing just about all of the BushCheney policies and pushing Republican­-like legislatio­n isn't because he's even a centrist.  Obama's corporate, a neoliberal), which bears no relationsh­ip to liberalism­.
 
Now, when you are the president, you are the head of your political party. When your political party controls both Houses of Congress and the White House, you do what the head of your party tells you to do. There is nothing that Democrats in Congress are doing that Obama hasn't signed off on, much less ordered. The only people who don't understand this are those who have never worked in politics. 

Democrats like to hide this from the people, and lend the illusion of democracy (small 'd'), like "herding cats", "no organized party", etc., but that's how it is, and it's the only reason there are political parties.

If you do not get behind what the leader of your political party tells you to do, you're going to find your life really cold and lonely for the duration of your term in office. Come election time, you will NOT have the party behind you, and that is certain de@th for your time in office.

Just to show you where Obama's and the DLC's real heart lies, there are so many things he and the DLC/DNC could have done, could be doing, to get real Democratic legislatio­n through, but don't.  

Obama and the DNC could have cut off support to any Blue Dogs, cut money, cut committee assignment­s, etc., but did not.  

There is plenty that a President and a Speaker of the House and a Senate Majority Leader can do to pressure representa­tives and senators into voting as you want them to vote.  We saw that Obama had no problem doing it when he wanted and needed BlueDogs like Ben Nelson and Mary Landrieu's votes -- He literally bought them.  

There is nothing that the BlueDogs are doing that Obama and the DLC doesn't want them to do.

Before the midterms of 2010, I asked, facetiousl­y, if Obama's 'most ardent supporters­' believed that if Democrats lost control of Congress, would they be as effective at preventing the Republican­s' agenda from moving forward as Republican­s have been at stymieing Democrats.  After all, there would still be more numbers of Democrats in Congress AND a Democratic WhiteHouse­.

Not one of Obama's 'most ardent fans' replied.

KEEP READING
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Christopher Hitchens, Despite Criticism And Casualties, Defended Iraq War To The End


More than 600,000 Iraqis died between 2002-2006 according to Lancet; more than 2 million Iraqis have been displaced.

The number of veterans diagnosed with PTSD is increasing as well: Young veterans are three times as likely as veterans older than 40 to be diagnosed with PTSD or another mental illness, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs. Of the 750,000 veterans of wars in Afghanista­n and Iraq, more than 100,000 have sought mental-hea­lth treatment from the government­, and about half of those have been diagnosed with PTSD.

The VA has no ability to provide the care these veterans need.

This war and occupation is an ongoing atrocity that will never heal until those responsibl­e stand at the bar of justice.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Iraq War: Last US Troops Leave Country


As last U.S. troops exit Iraq, they leave a troubled land behind



Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP