A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Obamacare 2013: Obama's Legacy Tied To Health Care Reform That Bears His Name

Sunday, January 20, 2013


Yes, nations with universal healthcare have the longest lifespans, but ACA is NOT universal healthcare.

health insurance ≠ medical treatment

Obama's healthcare legislation doesn't control costs and doesn't deliver medical treatment to everyone (not even those who think they're going to get it).  Insurance companies aren't required to cover anyone's preexisting condition gratis.    And between increased premium costs, deductibles and co-pays, ACA Unlikely to Stem Medical Bankruptcies

People who voted for Obama/Democrats voted to get affordable, quality medical treatment.  That was NOT a vote to protect and further enrich the insurance and pharmaceutical industries.  Voters didn't send Obama/Democrats into power to entrench the insurance industry as the gatekeepers to being able to get medical treatment.  Voters didn't send Obama and Democrats to Washington to continue tying insurance benefits to their employment.  Yet that's precisely what Obama and the DLC-controlled Democrats did.

Meet The New 1%: - Healthcare CEOs replace bankers as America's best paid:

Pity WallStreet's bankers. Once the highest-paid bosses in the land, they are now also-rans. The real money's in healthcare and drugs, according to the latest survey of executive pay.  One example is JoelGemunder, CEO Omnicare, who had a total pay package in 2010 worth $98 million.

ACA's nothing more than a massive giveaway to the health insurance industry.  It's one of the most corrupt pieces of legislation ever enacted by our government.

The health insurance industry provides no real service.  All it does is take money out of the system.  It's nothing more than a blood-sucking middleman.

Dr. MarciaAngell, a proponent of single payer universal health care, testifying before Congress as to the reason the system is in such a shambles:  

"It's set up to generate profits NOT to provide care.  To pay for care, we rely on hundreds of investor-owned insurance companies that profit by refusing coverage to the sickest patients and limiting services to the others.  They cream roughly 20% off the top of the premium dollar for profits and overhead.  Our method of delivering care's no better than our method of paying for it.  We provide much of the care in investor-owned health facilities that profit by providing too many services for the well-insured and too few for those who cannot pay.  Most doctors are paid fee-for-service which gives them a similar incentive to focus on profitable services, particularly specialists, who receive very high fees for expensive tests and procedures.  In sum, healthcare's for maximizing income and not maximizing health..."

And ACA does nothing to change that.

Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Rush Limbaugh Abortion Idiocy Revealed


More crazy circular logic an Obama 'ardent fan'. 

When you wield power, you really don't care what your most reliable enemies call you.  You don't have to.  And Obama has shown us that he has no problem being authoritarian, dictatorial, fascistic, with his gun control executive actions, expanding wars without Congressional authorization (Libya), and other moves by his branch of government.  But Obama's 'most ardent fans' are no different than Bush's, and can never accept that they've been hoodwinked.  They will never believe that the Democratic Party is no different than the Republican Party because they don't want to, and will reject any information that would create doubt.  
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Rush Limbaugh Abortion Idiocy Revealed


It's got 'White House' on it - That's as good as it gets for Obama-approved.  But more importantly, there is NOTHING that comes out as a reaction to the White House petition system that isn't directly linked to the Oval Office.  That's pure political policy.

The circular logic that ObamaZombies have to adopt in order to keep themselves from accepting the responsibility of their poor decision-making process is what's causing the 1%'s ability to enslave the 99%.  

Censorship has nothing to do with this; Limbaugh has no intrinsic right over anyone else to be on the DoD's air waves.  But "censorship" as you deem it has been going on at the AFN for years - Howard Stern, for example.  

A civilian-controlled military is supposed to be apolitical.  And when there's a systemic problem (sexual harassment, abuse and assault), you don't turn a blind-eye to it by providing an approved enabler to opine on the DoD's air waves.  That's crazy dysfunctional.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP