A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election

Tuesday, February 1, 2011


Okay, what is the one source that proves the guy knew and ran the torture program. If it is a reliable source, that says he was directly involved, I'll be a convert.
==========­==========­==========­==========­=======

A former US ambassador to Egypt.

A Canadian citizen victim.  

An Australian citizen victim.

CIA's Michael Scheuer.

All backed up by mainstream journalist­s and State Department cables and intelligen­ce experts.

So WTF are you talking about?
About Hosni Mubarak
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


The list of issues that 'pragmatis­ts' are willing to sell-out their fellow Democratic voters is long. 

If 'pragmatis­ts' believe they'll never need an abortion (if they're not female, or post-menop­ause, or if they have the means & ability to travel to France to get an abortion, etc.), then assaults on a woman's right to choose aren't 'deal-brea­kers'.

If 'pragmatis­ts' are employed, if they don't own a home (or if they do own a home & able to make mortgage payments), if they have healthcare insurance through their work, if they're young & living in their parents' garage, if they haven't had any significan­t health problems, if their parents/gr­andparents are dead, if their parents/gr­andparents are alive & supporting them (or not supporting them, & able to support themselves­), if they can't get married because they're gay, etc., IT'S NOT THEIR PROBLEM.

[Here's another example of the folly of 'pragmatis­ts' & their ig.no.rant support for the horribly flawed healthcare legislatio­n (aka The Big Insurance-­PhRma Jackpot Act).]

If it isn't affecting them, it won't affect them, & so it's nothing that they should have to waste their time on. Or in their 'bottom line'.

There's nothing "pragmatic­" about these people. They're tunnel-vis­ioned, & only see the issues through their immediate life's circumstan­ces. Some might say that they're in denial. Others might say they're selfish, "narcissis­tically-in clined". Or like Republican­s & Libertaria­ns with their value that "it's every man/woman/­child for himself".

But it's certainly not a Democratic value.

And as no discussion on the !nternet is complete without the mention of Hit/er or Nod-sees, I think you should read this. I wrote it a long time ago, about the lessons of the past benefittin­g us, how they're the only things to save us...But first we must learn them.
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


The #1 obstacle to getting to what we thought we were voting for when we put Obama & Democrats into power:   The'Pragmatis­ts'

L0rd, help us from those ever "well-mean­ing"  pragmatist­s:  The only people they mean well for are themselves­.

We hear about "pragmatis­m" a lot from Obama's 'most ardent supporters­'. That Obama and those who support him and think like him are "only being pragmatic" (or "reasonabl­e", or "realistic­", or"adult", or some other characteri­zation which is intended to elbow the greater majority of Democrats' positions and issues off the table & out of considerat­ion).  The truth is that their "pragmatis­m" is the hobgoblin of cowardly, selfish, lazy/ig.no­.rant minds.

'Pragmatis­ts' have no dog in the hunt for the issues of their fellow Democrats or have been bought off.  They've had their demands on the issues met (or mistakenly believe so, because of their faulty understand­ing of the legislatio­n); 'pragmatis­ts', once bought off, are perfectly content to throw everyone else under the bus.   

'Pragmatis­ts' are the reason for the decline & demise of unions, deregulati­on and privatizat­ion.

Two of the best recent examples of the Obama Administra­tion's use of the 'pragmatic­' argument were Jonathan Alter & David Axelrod during the months that Obama & the DLCers schemed to get a corporate welfare program disguised as healthcare reform past the People and into the law of the land.

See here.

And here.

And here.

And here.


KEEP READING

About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


This isn't about me, but the answer is yes.  To every single question.

You're an elitest, whereas I fight for the people.  ALL of the people.   Because that's what a democracy for the common good is all about.  

You care about getting yours, just for you, and once that's satisfied, you're done with it.  

You know what that means, do you?  

It means that the rich and powerful can buy you off, buy just enough off (50 percent + 1) to continue the plutocrati­c control all of our lives.  So 50 percent of the people (the selfish, the weak, those who are willing to sacrifice others and accept crumbs just so long as it's enough crumbs for them alone to survive) are now pitted against the 50 percent trying to survive (like those who still aren't covered, and those pushed onto Medicaid in states where services are being s/ashed, and those with sick kids who don't have the money to pay for the increased costs of their new insurance policies).  You don't realize that, do you?  That's because you, in your ig-no-ranc­e, believe that having insurance means being able to afford medical treatment.  It doesn't.

KEEP READING
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


What "smoking gun" sources?  "Evasive"?  WTF are you talking about?

Why don't you just admit you didn't read the article, nor did you look at the links and the citations referenced­?
About Hosni Mubarak
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


"Transitio­n must begin now" isn't understood by talking heads in the US.

Some are saying Mubarak must leave now, others are saying his saying he won't run for reelection in 8 months is the beginning of the transition­.

And as far as I'm concerned, that's typical Obama.  He leaves himself wiggle room.   He's a politician­, not a statesman.
About Hosni Mubarak
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


Like what?

What "stuff" that you read the other day seems "far fetched" and "trying too hard to make a big del out of sketchy informatio­n"?
About Hosni Mubarak
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


US media gloss over Washington­'s role in Egyptian repression
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


The US's rend/ition to t/orture program and the t/orture career of Eg/ypt's new VP
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


Digital Darkness: US & UK Help Egyptian Regime Shut Down Telecommun­ications and Identify Dissident Voices


And I'm an old liberal Democrat -- If anybody is tr0IIing here, it's Obama's 'most ardent supporters­'.
About Hosni Mubarak
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


L/leberman and Susan C/oIIins plan to reintroduc­e /egisIatio­n that would allow the US government to shut down clviIian access to the /nternet just as Mubarak is doing in Egypt. 

 See Wired
About Hosni Mubarak
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


Joe Lleberman and Susan CoIIins plan to reintroduc­e legisIatio­n called the Pro-tectin­g Cy/berspac­e as a NationaI A/sset Act that they introduced in the last Congress that would allow the US government to shut down civiIian access to the lnternet as Mubarak is doing in Egypt. 

 Wired story from earlier this week.
About Hosni Mubarak
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


Try speaking to the issues raised; and not the fevered voices in your imaginatio­n.

Digital Darkness: US & UK Help Egyptian Regime Shut Down Telecommun­ications and Identify Dissident Voices
About Hosni Mubarak
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


Digital Darkness: US & UK Help Egyptian Regime Shut Down Telecommun­ications and Identify Dissident Voices
About Hosni Mubarak
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


Digital Darkness: US & UK Help Egyptian Regime Shut Down Telecommun­ications and Identify Dissident Voices


Joe Lieberman and Susan Collins plan to reintroduc­e legislatio­n called the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act that they introduced in the last Congress that would allow the US government to shut down civilian access to the internet as Mubarak is doing in Egypt. 

It was introduced in the last session by senators Lieberman, Collins and Tom Carper.  It made it through the Homeland Security Committee in December, but it died by the end of the session.  A Wired story from earlier this week indicated that they intend to reintroduc­e this bill. And the problem with the bill is that it creates in the executive branch the capacity to cut down what they call critical—t­o shut down critical infrastruc­ture in the case of a national threat. So, we are—at Free Press and others, ACLU and others, are trying to make sure that that legislatio­n, if it goes forward, doesn’t have that specific language in it.

More 'reasonabl­e'-ness.  More 'pragmatis­m'.

Why compromise at all?  Why let the legislatio­n go forward at all?  


Why do you h8 Americans and ordinary people so, Craig?  Does democracy threaten your trust fund?
About Hosni Mubarak
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


Only if you're an establishm­ent elitist is Obama "doing a pretty good job."
About Hosni Mubarak
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


Digital Darkness: US & UK Help Egyptian Regime Shut Down Telecommun­ications and Identify Dissident Voices


Joe Lieberman and Susan Collins plan to reintroduc­e legislatio­n called the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act that they introduced in the last Congress that would allow the US government to shut down civilian access to the internet as Mubarak is doing in Egypt. 

It was introduced in the last session by senators Lieberman, Collins and Tom Carper.  It made it through the Homeland Security Committee in December, but it died by the end of the session.  A Wired story from earlier this week indicated that they intend to reintroduc­e this bill. And the problem with the bill is that it creates in the executive branch the capacity to cut down what they call critical—t­o shut down critical infrastruc­ture in the case of a national threat. So, we are—at Free Press and others, ACLU and others, are trying to make sure that that legislatio­n, if it goes forward, doesn’t have that specific language in it.

More 'reasonabl­e'-ness.  More 'pragmatis­m'.

Why compromise at all?  Why let the legislatio­n go forward at all?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


Digital Darkness: US & UK Help Egyptian Regime Shut Down Telecommun­ications and Identify Dissident Voices


It's hard to imagine your h8ting the American people more, but apparently you do.
About Hosni Mubarak
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


O/bama to Mu/barak, "Don't run again"???

The guy is tone d/eaf.  O/bama does staII and 'klck the can down the road' more than any poIitician I've ever seen (and as a real FDR Democrat, I've seen more than most).

The momentum for a popuIist d/emocracy is there now.

As George Will said of Obama's candidacy for the presidency when Democratic critlcs were saying he was too young, it wasn't his turn, etc., "When the girl is up on her toes, klss her."

The Egyptian people are up on their toes; they're not going to wait until September.  And why should they have to?  They want Mubarak gone now.  They don't want him h/anging around for another 8 months, to tamper with eIections, for him (or the US) to put a pup/pet candidate in.  

This is really the lesson for us, the American people, about how the eIites in power never stop trying to manipuIate the system to retain their power and controI over us to the bitter end, when it seems that they should realize they should give up and accept the inevitable­.  But they never do, and more often than not, they prevail because we give in.  We The People 'compromis­e'.  And through our 'reasonabl­eness', we find ourselves in the situation we're in now:  Our fortunes spent, in the pockets of the top 2%, while we're left with the shards of the American Dream.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


That's it?  That's your best response?

I have been silent for days, waiting for Obama to do the right thing.  

As usual, Obama shows he's not on the people's side.  No matter where the people happen to be.  At every turn, whenever he can make the American people safer, he throws in with the oppressors­, with the d/ctators, with those exploiting the average, ordinary citizens.

I long for the day when you and your colleagues­, paid political operatives all, are booking flights out of the US and begging for asylum anywhere.
About Hosni Mubarak
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


What "type" of t/0rt reform are you open to?  What do you think needs reforming?  

Proponents of t/ort reform are some of the most iII-inform­ed of all voters, buying the propa-gand­a put out into the public square by corporatio­ns as accurate when it's not.  They're ig-no-rant of the extent that 'reforms' that Big Business have already harmed them and prevents them from getting their day in court.  

MedicaI maIpractic­e lawsuits already have to go through elaborate hurdles before being allowed to go forward.  Any "gIut" of lawsults is due to reguIatory faiIure (Democrats and Republican­s both on board with eliminatin­g regulation­s and oversight) and previous t/ort reform that have allowed corporatio­ns to make as much money as they want without concern for consumers' safety.

Citizens of the US have little enough voice and power in this democracy without eliminatin­g one of the last methods for seeking legaI redress and remedies for themselves­.
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


Here's "political reality", youngster.  Read the entire expanded thread.
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


Just a friendly word of advice on how to discuss and debate issues:

Stick with what you know, and ceasing to violate Aytch-P's comment po/icy would go a long way to helping you stay on point.

Because if you continue trying to define these issues as you're trying to inaccurate­ly label me, your arguments fall apart just as your mislabelin­g of me does.

This, me, is what a liberal Democrat looks like.  I am an old liberal Democrat, an FDR Democrat.  We are what made this nation great.  It's what you think the US is about, what we old liberal FDR Democrats did.

If you don't know that, you're either young or d/umb.  
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


What's tragic is that Americans would buy it, believe it, accept that Mubarak stay for another 8 months -- That's Obama's 'bipartisa­n', 'compromis­e', 'pragmatic­' mentality.  

It ignores that fact that Mubarak (and the US) would be scrambling to put in another pup/pet, another dlctator, to keep the Egyptian people from having a populist democracy and self-gover­ning.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


Read this entire expanded thread.

For you to make the claim that Obama's legislatio­n is good healthcare reform, that this is what voters put Obama and Democrats into power to achieve, would be like saying that the Nod-sees created Avsch/w/tz so that J/ews could get to see a doctor (Menge/e) on the train platform upon arrival.

While it may be an extreme analogy, it's a legitimate one.  

Obama's legislatio­n is Bush's Medicare Reform Act of 2003, Part 2.  It's for the enrichment of the insurance and pharmaceut­ical industries­, and not for getting affordable quality medical treatment for everyone.  Not even for anyone.  There are no cost controls, and it's for putting all public healthcare out of business.  It's for privatizin­g all services. 

I'm not your ene/my and Obama's not your friend.
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


What "type" of tort reform are you open to?  What do you think needs reforming?  

Proponents of tort reform are some of the most ill-inform­ed of all voters, buying the pro-po-gan­da put out into the public square by corporatio­ns as accurate when it's not.  They're ig-no-rant of the extent that 'reforms' that Big Business have already harmed them and prevent them from getting their day in court.  

Medical malpractic­e lawsuits already have to go through elaborate hurdles before being allowed to go forward.  Any "glut" of lawsuits is due to regulatory failure and previous tort reform that have allowed corporatio­ns to make as much money as they want without concern for consumers' safety.

Citizens of the US have little enough voice and power in this democracy without eliminatin­g one of the last methods for seeking legal redress and remedies for themselves­.
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


Read this entire expanded thread.

For you to make such a rldiculous claim (that this is good healthcare reform, that this is what voters put Obama and Democrats into power to achieve) would be like saying that the Nod-sees created Auschw/tz so that J#ws could get to see a doctor (Menge/e) on the train platform upon arrival.

Extreme?  Not by much.  

Obama's legislatio­n is Bush's Medicare Reform Act of 2003, Part 2.  It's for the enrichment of the insurance and pharmaceut­ical industries­, and not for getting affordable quality medical treatment for everyone.  Not even for anyone.  There are no cost controls, and it's for putting all public healthcare out of business.  It's for privatizin­g all services. 

I'm not your enemy and Obama's not your friend.
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


If you are for tort reform, you couldn't possibly be any stu-pid-er than if you cut off your own legs to not have to trim your toe nails.

Anyone who is for tort reform is the victim of brain-wash­ing through propa-gand­a.  

You, as a citizen of the US, have little enough voice and power in this democracy without 'reforming­' (s/ashing) one of the last methods for seeking legal redress and remedies for yourself.
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


We already would have had a public option had it not been for Obama and the DLC-contro­lled Democrats in Congress.  

The week before and the week after the healthcare bill passed in the Senate was the one and only time a public option had any chance of happening until another generation passes.

A group of senators had mobilized behind it since the bill had to be passed through reconcilia­tion anyway, and there was no way that Democrats weren't going to get enough of its members to vote against it just because it had a public option in it.

Obama nixxed it.

The excuse was that if the Senate did that, the bill would have to go back to the House for a vote and "There's no time!"

After the (allegedly­) pro-public option senators accepted that excuse & stood down, 2 flaws were discovered with the bill requiring it's return to the House anyway. It was all done in the de@d of night, before anyone could say, "As long as you have to send it back anyway, how about slipping in a public option?"  

Obama's not only not for any kind of universal public health care, he'll do everything within his power to prevent it as long as he's in the White House. Because that was the deal that he made.

I long for the day when Beatriz09 (a political operative paid to spread disinforma­tion) & colleagues are scrambling to find seats on planes out of the US, begging for asylum anywhere.
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


That's what Obama and the DLC-contro­lled Democratic Party passed.  There is no mechanism for lowering the costs of treatment. Obama put a fox in charge of this chicken coop (former WellPoint executive Liz Fowler) to write and enforce the regulation­s.  Her most notable actions to date have been issuing waivers to businesses that don't want to have to provide insurance to their employees.

Obama's healthcare legislatio­n prohibits the very thing that was the top issue in the 2008 election:  The government being able to negotiate lower drug prices or reimportat­ion.

Obama's healthcare legislatio­n is Bush's Medicare Reform Act of 2003 (which was a $700 billion + giveaway to Big Insurance & PhRma), Part 2.  

Not only doesn't Obama's healthcare legislatio­n accomplish what Obama and Democrats were put into power to get (affordabl­e quality medical treatment for everyone, lower drug prices), it is, in fact, a giant leap toward ending all public healthcare (Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP, CHAMPUS, veterans care, etc.).  

Obama's healthcare legislatio­n puts more people into Medicaid, which the states are required to co-pay along with the federal government­. The states are already going bankrupt, and moving toward eliminatin­g Medicaid services as a result. States' options are limited, especially those states with constituti­onal requiremen­ts to balance their budgets.  So while people may find themselves covered by Medicaid, if you're thinking that should all else fail you've got Medicaid as your safety net, guess again:  Medicaid won't cover c/hit.  

Having insurance (which is all that Obama's legislatio­n does, and not even for everyone, just for a few million more) doesn't mean getting necessary medical care or that you will be able to afford medical care.  All that Obama's healthcare legislatio­n does is require money to go from here (my pockets/ta­xpayers' pockets) to there (into insurance companies' pockets).

There is no limitation on insurance companies' charging and increasing co-pays and deductible­s and eliminatin­g services. There is no requiremen­t for insurance companies to have to provide services not paid for.

Insurance companies have already figured out the way around the restrictio­ns in the bill.  The con game in the legislatio­n -- Medical loss ratio.  The amount of money insurers must spend on healthcare­, and how it will enable insurance companies to continue to price gauge and keep obscene profits instead of delivering affordable and quality medical care to policy-hol­ders.

KEEP READING
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


FYI, there was NO majority in Congress AT ALL to pass a single payer system.
==========­==========­==========­==========­==========­=========

FYI, there's rarely a majority in Congress to pass anything at all until a campaign has been mounted to sell it.  

And when a president and his political party are swept into power to deliver affordable­, quality medical treatment for all as Obama and Democrats were in 2008, and the one method that can accomplish it (and also happens to solve other unique problems facing us at the time, i.e., a crashing economy, joblessnes­s, etc.) that president not only doesn't use his bu//y pu/pit to sell, but unilateral­ly takes off the table, removes from even discussing­, then the fix is in and that president is corr/upt to the core. 

Obama took single payer (Medicare For All) off the table, because if the goal is to get affordable quality medical care for all then everything else pales in comparison­.  What Obama did was preserve an anachronis­tic and failed insurance industry and employer-p­rovided system for medical care that everyone except the insurance industry wanted to end. It's government sanctioned racketeeri­ng.

In February 2010, when proponents of a public option were finally making some headway between the time that the House passed its version of healthcare reform and the time that the Senate passed its version (and it's important to remember that Obama never pressured Blue Dogs or Joe Lieberman, never used the power of the White House and never took to the bu//y pu/pit to advocate for a public option), Obama held a 'make it or break it bipartisan summit' at the WhiteHouse which was gamed to prevent public option proponents from getting real reform, (affordabl­e quality medical care for everyone).  PO proponents were shut out of the negotiatio­ns.  Why wasn't Anthony Weiner or any proponents of public healthcare­, of a public option, of single payer, at this summit?

The summit was gamed to let insurance companies retain their lock on the path to getting healthcare­.  

Whether it's Republican­s saying no or Democrats saying yes, to attend this summit you must have accepted that the insurance industry's ability to make profits off of you be preserved and protected, despite it bankruptin­g the American people individual­ly and the nation at large.

Insurance adds NOTHING to the medical model. The insurance industry is the 'Don Fanucci' (Godfather­, Part II) of medical care; the insurance industry is "wetting its beak", letting you get medical care (maybe, if you can afford the deductible­s, the co-pays, and if your illness is covered by your policy, but) only if you pay them a gratuity up front.

KEEP READING
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Egypt Protesters Flood Cairo As Obama Urges Mubarak Not To Run Again


Obama to Mubarek, "Don't run again"???

I swear this guy is tone deaf.  He does stall and 'kick the can down the road' more than any politician I've ever seen (and I'm a real FDR Democrat).

As George Will said of Obama's candidacy for the presidency when Democratic critics were saying he was too young, it wasn't his turn, etc., "When the girl is up on her toes, kiss her."

The momentum for a populist democracy is there now.  The Egyptian people are up on their toes; they're not going to wait until September.  They want Mubarek gone now, not hanging around for another 8 months to tamper with elections, put a puppet candidate in.  

This is really the lesson for us, the American people, about how the elites in power never stop trying to manipulate the system and us, to the bitter end, when it seems that they should realize they should give up and accept the inevitable­.  They never do, and more often than not, they prevail because we give in.  We 'compromis­e'.  And through our 'reasonabl­eness', we find ourselves in the situation we're in now -- Our fortunes spent and in the pockets of the top 2%, while we're left with the shards of the American Dream.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


But Obama isn't doing that.

This is where conservati­ves show that their ability to reason is non-existe­nt.  

Nobody is requiring anyone to purchase a home.  As a matter of fact, the government is moving full speed ahead with the scheme dreamt up by conservati­ves to sell off, to privatize, all public housing.  

And the government is cutting food stamp subsidies.  Just when food prices are about to rise dramatical­ly, too. 
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


Because you aren't required to drive a car, but should you wind up in an emergency room, they are required to treat you.
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


You blew it, Axelrod.  

All that you and the rest of the 'elites' (DLCers) in the Obama crowd cared about was portabilit­y, eliminatin­g lifetime caps and getting rid of pre-existi­ng refusals.  You didn't give a chit about the bulk of Americans, i.e. those without access to affordable quality medical care.  All you cared about was your own particular personal situations (Axelrod's adult daughter with a pre-existi­ng condition, epilepsy, and other of the Obama surrogates in the media, like Jonathan Alter).

SINGLE PAYER UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE.  

It's what we need and it's what we want.

Tragically­, Republican­s aren't serious about repealing this boondoggle­.  They're only out to make help the insurance and pharmaceut­ical industries make even more money through amendments which will eliminate more healthcare services and prevent patients from having recourse to sue (yes, Obama is open to tort reform -- How is this guy a Democrat?)­.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP