Sandra Day O'Connor Doubts Decision To Take Bush V. Gore

You're welcome - I can post more links and will when I have to time to sort through them all.  There used to be many more, but over time the media that published them have taken them down.  

There aren't any links from "the other side" (supporting Bush's claim that he got more legal ballots) because it's not true, so all they can do is call us names and create havoc and confusion as a distraction.  
In the years since we've seen more evidence of how they steal elections (suppression efforts, registered voter purges, dirty tricks like phone banks directing voters to the wrong polls, electronic voting machine manipulation, inadequate ballots and machines) so it's not as big a surprise to many as it was in 2000.  

One piece of information that got absolutely no coverage was that the CIA was working on GOP absentee ballots in the weeks leading up to election day in Florida.  That was the most amazing revelation from the televised court hearings in the post-election days in Florida --  'CharlesKane' testified to altering absentee ballots in the Martin County's Registrar's office in the two week period prior to election day (it's against the law and should render the ballots null and void).  When Kane was sworn in, he had to identify himself and give his occupation and employer. Retired CIA.  The judge asked him why he was altering the absentee ballots, and he answered "I go where I'm told."  Verbatim quote.  I heard it with my own ears.  The judge didn't follow up.  There was next to no news coverage of this, and none by the networks.  

When you think of CIA's involvement in elections overseas, why wouldn't we also think they're monkeying in our elections?  
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost