Sandra Day O'Connor Doubts Decision To Take Bush V. Gore

What Brooks Jackson wrote at FactCheck was his opinion.  Not fact.  

How you and the Bush-supporters try to defend his assuming the office of the presidency is very much like how Bush investigated 9/11: By setting up a commission with members who had to agree before being allowed onto the commission that there would only be one report that would include only that which they all could agree on and no dissenting report.

If you want to know what happened on 9/11, you don't assemble political partisans and limit the scope and area of their inquiry.  Yet that's exactly what happened.  And that's also what your assessment of the 2000 election is.  If you only count the ballots that were counted, you'll always get the result that Bush won, end of story.  But that wasn't the end of the story.  There were hundreds of thousands of perfectly legible, legal ballots that weren't counted and by which Gore won.  
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost