It's interesting, and while I'd love to see mainstream media investigate it and provide a full report, it doesn't change the fact that the actual way that our system of determining whether someone is qualified to be president of the US is through the US Senate. Or, to date, that's how it's been done and it hasn't been adjudicated through the Courts.
To the best of my knowledge, both Obama and McCain were 'vetted' by the US Senate in 2007/2008.
But it is an interesting subject, both generally about how we go about vetting candidates for the office of the presidency (poorly, IMHO -- We leave it to po/itical hacks with special interests, who have no incentive to be truthful and have no great record being honest), and specifically, with regard to Obama. It's not going to change the fact that he is the president and would remain president even if he was born on Mars.
So why the resistance to looking at it?
About Health
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
0 comments:
Post a Comment