DOJ Foot-Dragging On Prison Rape Unites Left-Right Coalition

As to your second point, I'm not putting words or thoughts into your mouth.



I said, "You are proving my point", which was:



=="I think that is one reason why the DoJ and Holder (in spite of being male) exhibit no sense of urgency, because it's a sex crime against men. Whether it's about Holder and other men at the DoJ being unconscious about the crime of rape (not wanting to think about men being violated by other men, for so many reasons) or something else (that to many men, all sexual activity is wanted sexual activity), their failure to act on this affects all of our lives."==



You then challenged the frequency or pervasiveness of the act against men based on no facts, which you admit, just a hunch on your part). What was your intent, if not to dismiss it as a less serious problem than when women are raped?



My point was that people tend not to want to look at the problem of men being raped, and look for ways to avoid it. And then you tried to provide a reason to avoid it, thereby proving my point.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost