A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Bill Clinton Praises George Bush's Book

Sunday, November 14, 2010


Further, the rabid Righties do not seem to have a foot on her neck which they would be quick to do if there were cause.

Why do you think that might be?

If I as an old liberal Democrat, for example, had no problem with Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice or Secretary of State Jim Baker or Secretary of State Larry Eagleburger or Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, etc., what would you think?  Would you think they were doing a good job as I, a liberal Democrat want and expect the US foreign policy to be?  

I am forming my opinion by the favorable reactions from those she has dealt with around the world.

The reactions to Hillary Clinton and any respect she receives when she travels around the world are about her as a popular First Lady, and not as Secretary of State.
About George Bush Book
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Jim DeMint Would Accept Compromise On Bush Tax Cuts


undefined
About Taxes
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Jim DeMint Would Accept Compromise On Bush Tax Cuts


The rich have gotten rich off of the sweat & labor of others and then taken those profits to buy politicians who gamed the system so that they wouldn't have to pay taxes through all manner of sundry tax schemes not available to the poor and middle classes.  The rich also 'closed the door' on the ways that initially enabled them to amass their 'seed money' for creating their businesses.  

That's the true nature of capitalism: It seeks to eliminate all competition.

Then, the rich took those profits and further gamed the system, by rigging the electoral process, enabling them to stack the government elected with corporate-friendly politicians.  Business interests over the People's interests.  

Over the course of US history, corporations have managed to game our political system, and done it so effectively that the two-party system competes to serve corporate interests while defending that service as, "What's good for GM (corporations) is good for America (We the People)". 

Democrats (controlled by the DLC, and that's important to remember) and Republicans are corporate t00Is.  Like siblings competing for the attention and approval (campaign contributions) of a parent, Republicans and DLC-controlled Democrats try to outdo each other in delivering for their real constituent, transnational corporations.  The trick for them has been to make it seem as if they were really working on behalf of WeThePeople. 

Democratic voters have mistakenly believed that Obama and Democrats were for strong regulations on banks, Wall Street, investigations, prosecutions, restitution of what has been robbed from the middle class and poor for the past 30+ years, environmental clean-up, clean, sustainable renewable energy (and that isn't nuclear), putting an end to the wars and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, affordable, quality universal healthcare (which Obama's healthcare legislation is not), and more.

The DLC-controlled Democratic Party gives lip service to these and all populist issues, because like the Republican Party, the DLC works for the benefit of transnational corporations.
About Taxes
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Jim DeMint Would Accept Compromise On Bush Tax Cuts


I have a hard time believing people's memories are so short.  

No, it wasn't a done deal.  

To begin with, the TARP was passed into law by a Democratically controlled Congress.  Paulson wanted all of the money, then, no accountability whatsoever, but because of the outcries by the People, only half of it was released.  

Obama had the opportunity and the clout to impose any kind of restrictions, regulations, even nationalizing the banks, but chose not to before handing out the second half of the money.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Jim DeMint Would Accept Compromise On Bush Tax Cuts


It's not wrong, and I rest my case.

I'd go back to your physician for a meds consult if I were you, zoloft.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Jim DeMint Would Accept Compromise On Bush Tax Cuts


It's not their money.

It's borrowing so that We The People wind up paying what the rich should be paying in taxes.

We would be increasing the deficit by borrowing. 

We're already insolvent.

You're no patriot, dearie.  Why do you hate America so?  Why do you hate Americans?  And, because I doubt you are making that kind of money to qualify, why do you hate yourself so?
About Taxes
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Jim DeMint Would Accept Compromise On Bush Tax Cuts


Insulting and stup!d -- That's a tough combo to go through life as, zoloft.

Try reading entire comments before you go off on ad hominem attacks.
About Taxes
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP