How do you come to believe that "Americans seem to not want a government where workers, unions, shareholders and management have to work together"?
Let me rephrase it slightly and ask if you really believe that Americans don't want a government where workers, unions, shareholders & management work together?
About 2010 Elections
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Me, personally?
I'm not a member of the Green Party ( http://www
About 2010 Elections
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
No, the argument is which party is serving your interests, the average American citizen's interests, and the answer is neither. Both serve the corporations' interests, and if you can't see that corporations' interests are not only NOT aligned with the People's interests, but are in direct opposition to the People's interests, and that the Democrats are no better at serving the People's interests than the Republicans are, you have to have been asleep or bra!nwashed these past two years.
Did you happen to catch what happened in the Gulf of Mexico this year?
There is just about nothing that Obama & the DLC-controlled Democrats in Congress have done that had Republicans done them, you wouldn't be ready to march with a torch and a pitchfork over.
About 2010 Elections
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
I suggest that you consider Democrats & Republicans as working on the same side, as tag relay teams (or like siblings competing for parental approval). 'Good cop/bad cop'. One side (Republicans) makes brazen frontal assaults on the People, & when the People have had enough, they put Democrats into power because of Democrats' populist rhetoric.
Once in power, Democrats consolidate Republicans' gains from previous years, & continue on with Republican policies but renamed, with new advertising campaigns. They throw the People a few bones, but once Democrats leave office, we learn that those bones really weren't what WeThePeople thought they were.
Whenever the People get wise to the shenanigans & all the different ways they've been tricked & start seeing Democrats as no different than Republicans, Democrats switch the strategy. They invent new reasons for failing to achieve the People's business -- This current one, because "Democrats are nicer, not as ruthless, not criminal" etc., is custom-tailored to Obama's 'bipartisan cooperation' demeanor. It's smirk-worthy when you realize they're trying to sell that they're inept, unable to achieve what they were put into office to do, & that's "a good thing".
About 2010 Elections
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
#1 - Try reading the entire post that you're responding to.
Then you can read this: http://www
When it's topical, nobody is more incisively critical about Bill Clinton than me.
But right now, Obama is the president.
And both are the SAME as Republicans. You just confused by the packaging; you like and trust the 'D' stamped on Obama & Clinton.
About 2010 Elections
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
They lend him credibility, and that is their s!n.
If Laura Bush was at odds with his policies, she should have left him. Bush and Cheney have brought this nation to the edge of collapse, destroyed the lives of the middle class, and murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi men, women and children, displaced millions more, and there is no recovery for anyone in their path. Not in this lifetime.
About Oprah
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Obama's already broadcast what he & Democrats are going to do if Democrats remain in the majority -- More caving by Obama & Democrats to Republicans:
==According to excerpts from the Times, aides say that the president's been spending "a lot of time talking about Obama 2.0," brainstorming with administration officials about the best way to revamp the strategies & goals of the WhiteHouse.
And despite the predictions that Democrats may relinquish a large degree of legislating power, including perhaps control of the House & even Senate, Obama isn't thinking of the next two years as a period that'll be marked with the same obstructive nature from the GOP.
"It may be that regardless of what happens after this election, [Republicans] feel more responsible, either because they didn't do as well as they anticipated, & so the strategy of just saying no to everything & sitting on the sidelines & throwing bombs didn't work for them," Obama says in the article. "Or they did reasonably well, in which case the American people are going to be looking to them to offer serious proposals & work with me in a serious way."
DickDurbin says Obama's post-election agenda "will have to be limited & focused on the things that are achievable & high priorities for the American people." TomDaschle says Obama has to reach out more: "The key word is inclusion. He's got to find ways to be inclusive."==
http://www.huf fingtonpos
About 2010 Elections
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
© Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008
Back to TOP
