A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Ralph Nader Says Obama Is A 'War Criminal' Who Has Been 'More Aggressive' Than George W. Bush (VIDEO)

Tuesday, September 25, 2012


What "facts" were "omitted"?  And "looking to sound important"?  How?  You need to explain what it is you object to in those articles if you expect to be listened to.  

If you think expecting a president to uphold the Constitution, protect civil liberties and the rule of law isn't a Democrat's trait, then I was correct when I said that Obama/DLC/Third Way/No Labels have been trying to attract Republican voters to the Democratic Party, to turn the Democratic Party into the old Republican Party.

Listen, as long as I've got you-who-claims-to-be-a-Democrat here, perhaps you can answer this -- No other ObamaZombie can:

If Republican­s are such scvm (and I believe they are) and "so dangerous"­, why isn't Obama investigating and prosecutin­g them?

Why isn't Obama investigat­ing and prosecutin­g the greatest heist on the People in all history? 

Why are Obama-Demo­crats continuing the war crimes of BushCheney­, blocking investigat­ions and prosecutio­ns into their crimes?

How does a Democratic president, on the heels of the most criminally corrupt administra­tion in the nation's history, not replace Bush-era US attorneys? Presidents may fire US attorneys, and they do so routinely at the beginning of a new administra­tion. It is unusual to fire US attorneys in mid-term (as Bush did) except in cases of gross misconduct (which wasn’t the case during the BushAdmini­stration). Instead of returning the democracy to the American people, Obama's AttorneyGe­neral has US attorneys going after whistleblowers, legalized medicinal marijuana in the states and Bush-style obscenity prosecutions.

Obama's continuing just about all of the BushCheney policies, even going BushCo one better:  How do any of Obama's 'most ardent supporters­' explain Obama's doctrine that presidents have the right to kill American citizens with no due process, no oversight, and 'indefinite preventive detention' and no transparen­cy of anything a president asserts should be his secret?  It's Pure Kafka.  

How do Obama's 'most ardent supporters­' explain his putting Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, veterans' care, et al, on the table for benefits' cuts?  

As a Democrat, I don't know how any Democrat can get behind this.  How do Obama's 'most ardent supporters­' explain all that to themselves­?  How do you?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

0 comments:

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP