Anthony Weiner: Obama Sees Presidency More As 'Negotiator-In-Chief' Than 'Leader Of Our Country' (VIDEO)

"My sincerest apologies for the non-denial denial. To directly answer your question, nobody is paying me to comment on Huffington Post articles. That would be the most awesome job ever, but unfortunat­ely it is not to be."

==========­==========­==========­==========­====

That cinches it; you're a lawyer. [  ;-) ]

This is a good illustrati­on for anyone following this thread on how to listen to politician­-speak, and how voters have been led astray by Obama's weasely lawyer-spe­ak.  It is very similar to Bush-speak ("compassi­onate conservati­sm", "No Child Left Behind", Clear Skies Initiative­", etc.), but that which took an army of speechwrit­ers for Bush to do, Obama is able to do extemporan­eously while chewing Nicorette)­.  

In your case, still no "direct" answer.  

What you claim not to be doesn't cancel out your being "an operative paid to spread disinforma­tion, discourage­, or in other words, tamp down any move that would benefit people over corporatio­ns".  Or even a political operative paid to do other things, or an unpaid operative.  

Of course you have as much business expressing (ig.nor.an­t) opinions as anyone else -- This is still America, after all.  

When I question what "business" you have doing it is as a way of determinin­g your motivation for knowingly spreading disinforma­tion that is not in the overall American People's interest or in the individual person's interest.  Why would someone ig.nor.ant of the issues be advising others of what's not in their interests (and presumably yours, too), if you weren't to somehow prosper from it?  Even after you've been corrected, informed of the facts, you're unmoved.  

By the way, how is HP punditry "illustrio­us"?  
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost