A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Energy Secretary Steven Chu Resigns, Chastises Climate Deniers And Clean-Energy Critics

Saturday, February 2, 2013


That's what cabinet secretaries do, friend; engage in the politics of the division of government they oversee.  They further the agenda and the policies of the administration that it serves. They do not manage the day-to-day operations of their agencies.  That's the role of the government's permanent employees.  In Chu's case, his job was to further government investment in clean energy, reduce our dependence on foreign oil, address the global climate crisis, and create millions of new jobs.  

Keeping the public informed about what the government is doing and what's been accomplished isn't the job of the media.  There are publicity departments in just about every agency in government that interface with the White House's own publicity (media) department for the express purpose of influencing public opinion.  And when the Obama administration wants to do it, they do it expertly.   

The 68 responses to my comment proves my point.  See how the political arm of the government springs into action when it wants to?  Many, if not all, of the responses here are sock puppets, people/software programs, paid to comment, to lend the impression of support for Obama's policies.   Your tax dollars at work.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Energy Secretary Steven Chu Resigns, Chastises Climate Deniers And Clean-Energy Critics


You mean "covering" up.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Paul Krugman: Obama Won't Be Able To Pass Major Legislation In His Second Term

Tuesday, January 29, 2013


Flg away.  

And I did answer, but it went elsewhere.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Paul Krugman: Obama Won't Be Able To Pass Major Legislation In His Second Term

Monday, January 28, 2013


If JoeLieberman couldn't be counted on to vote with the DemocraticCaucus in lockstep on cloture and filibuster­s when the Republican­s voted in lockstep (particula­rly when it came to domestic issues, the only area of legislatio­n where Lieberman's vaguely progressiv­e), what possible purpose did it solve to have him in the DemocraticCaucus (and hand him the much coveted plum of a committee chair)? 

http://www­.nytimes.c­om/2008/11­/07/us/pol­itics/07co­ng.html?_r­=3&ref=pol­itics&oref­=slogin&or­ef=slogin


http://thi­nkprogress­.org/liebe­rman-not-p­rogressive­/


http://www­.dailykos.­com/story/­2008/11/8/­17349/2244


For his treachery against Democrats going back years (at least as far as the 2000 presidenti­al campaign, when he conceded absentee military ballots), Lieberman got everything out of that deal, and Democrats got what?

Without 60, without his voting on cloture/fi­libusters, on the legislatio­n that Obama and Democrats had planned to put on the floor in the coming 2-4 years (which has all been what Lieberman would be expected to vote in the same way as the rest of the Democrats)­, what is Lieberman needed for that you'd bring him into the DemocraticCaucus (make him privvy to your strategizi­ng) and reward him with a plum chairmansh­ip, where he buried investigat­ing the BushCheney administra­tion over their failures during HurricaneKatrina? 

For both the short term, immediate problem of advancing Democratic legislatio­n, and the long term effort to expand Democratic influence, rewarding treachery and expanding JoeLieberm­an's power wasn't in the interests of the Democratic­Party or the People's. 

Do you really believe that Obama got nothing for that concession­? No agreement that Lieberman would vote as Obama told him to vote? No agreement from Lieberman that he wouldn't join Republican­s in cloture/fi­libusterin­g, or an ultimatum that he couldn't join Republican­s in cloture/filibusterin­g?? No agreement that he'd sign on to a PublicOption?

Joe Lieberman has done Obama's bidding, done exactly what Obama wanted done.  Lieberman is in the Democratic Caucus because of Obama, and has performed exactly as Obama wanted.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell Reach Filibuster Reform Deal [UPDATE]

Friday, January 25, 2013


Pretty much the same people/corporations/industries that Republicans represent.  

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/untouchables/
http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/mcconnell_3/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/23/untouchables-wall-street-prosecutions-obama

While it will be interesting the corporate boards of directors that Obama lands on after the White House, it will be more interesting to see where Michelle Obama winds up.  More and more politicians are working as teams with their spouses, switchbacking between public office and corporate whor/tool-ing (Mitch McConnell and his wife Elaine Chao, Chris Dodd and his wife Jackie Clegg, Tom Daschle and his lobbyist wife Linda Hall Daschle, Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife Ginni Thomas, are just a few examples.  Then there's this.

Before entering the White House, Michelle Obama directly benefitted professionally from her husband's legislative efforts through her job at the University of Chicago Hospitals.  She was also a salaried board member of TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (a major Wal-Mart supplier) with ties to Citibank.  
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Filibuster Reform: Senators Reportedly Close To Deal On Modest Limits

Wednesday, January 23, 2013


Yes. On not getting Democratic voters' objectives met.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Rush Limbaugh Abortion Idiocy Revealed

Tuesday, January 22, 2013


Obama is the military.  He's the CiC.  And the refusal comes directly through the White House and the petition system that they've instituted.  
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP