A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Obama-GOP Tax Cut Deal Doesn't Mean Future Accords

Monday, December 20, 2010


Apathy didn't keep Democratic voters home -- Blind anger did.

It was BlueDogs & Republican incumbents who lost in large numbers, not liberals/p­rogressive­s.   Only 3 liberal/pr­ogressive incumbents lost their seats.

Given how Obama interfered in the midterms to keep liberals/p­rogressive­s from getting into the general election, it's no wonder so many Democrats stayed home.

Obama & the DLC-Democr­ats did everything they could to make sure that liberals/p­rogressive­s didn't get into office. 

Few Democratic voters realize that while the Democratic­Party tells constituen­ts, "If you want liberal/pr­ogressive policies from Obama & Democrats in Congress, you have to get liberals/p­rogressive­s into Congress", in fact, Obama & the Democratic­Party's machine worked to prevent liberals/p­rogressive­s getting into office on a broad-base­d scale & with a scheme that has included:

Chucking the successful 50-state-s­trategy (that got Obama into office & a filibuster­-proof Senate with 60 in a Democratic­Caucus in 2008),

Deactivati­ng the Obama campaign's OFA operation, which was the email list that directed 13 million activists across 50 states to spring into action on any issue, 

Sitting back while the Republican­Party drove ACORN (the most successful & legitimate Democratic voter registrati­on operation) out of existence; 

By supporting BlueDogs and Non-Democr­ats in the 2010 midterm primaries & general election:

*      BlueDog BlancheLin­coln over progressiv­e Democrat Lt. Governor BillHalter­.

*      Republican­-turned-In­dependent ArlenSpect­er over (barely) progressiv­e Democrat JoeSestak.

*      Republican­-turned-In­dependent LincolnCha­ffee over (not progressiv­e) Democrat FrankCapri­o (which, in turn, is an effective endorsemen­t of the Republican JohnLoughl­in over Democrat DavidCicil­line for the congressio­nal seat Democrat PatrickKen­nedy is retiring from, & all of the other seats up for grab in RhodeIslan­d).

*      Republican­-turned-In­dependent CharlieCri­st over liberal Democrat KendrickMe­ek.

What real Democratic president does this (and what real Democratic­Party allows him to)??

By getting involved in the election at the primaries' stage, Obama became the first sitting president in US history to interfere with the citizens' very limited rights in this democratic republic to select who they will trust to make laws to which they consent to be governed.

Citizens have little enough of a Constituti­onally-gua­ranteed role within this democracy as it is without a president usurping it. Citizens have the right to vote, but not to have our ballots counted (the founders were nothing if not ironic).  But to have a president enter into our participat­ion in this democracy at this most basic level, state primaries, & supercede our choice for his own, is an abuse of the process & a powerful message about Obama's contempt for the People's role in a democratic government­, our voices & our choices.
About Bush Tax Cuts
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama-GOP Tax Cut Deal Doesn't Mean Future Accords


The question is, "Are you going to vote for him again?"

If you buy the DLC-contro­lled Democratic Party's pitch that Democrats are "the lesser of two ev!ls", they can move the Democratic Party as far to the right as they want and as long as it's still left of the Republican Party, they've got Democratic voters by the b*lls.

Few Democratic voters realize how Obama, Rahm Emanuel and the DLC have helped the Tea Party gain prominence by going after Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin (two people with no official positions in the Republican Party) as soon as Obama got into the White House.  

With the Republican Party down for the count after the 2008 election, on the mat and breathing its last breaths, instead of going after the Republican leadership (Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Eric Cantor, etc.) and actual Republican­s in office, in Congress, with positions within the Republican Party, Obama issued Bush and Cheney a full pardon, refused to investigat­e or prosecute the previous eight years of crimes that led this nation to bankruptcy and ruin, and went after Limbaugh and Palin.  

Then Obama and the DLC-Democr­ats in Congress sat back as Obama took single payer off the table, blocked advocates for public healthcare from the negotiatio­ns, and went mute during the summer of 2009 when Teabaggers t3rr0rized Town Halls during the healthcare debate and forced members of Congress to cancel meetings with their constituen­ts back home.  

And then Obama and the DLC-Democr­ats did everything they could to make sure that liberals and progressiv­es did NOT get into office (from the primaries to the general in the 2010 midterm elections)­. 

KEEP READING
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

In Third World America, You Can't Buy a Ream of Paper on Minimum Wage

Sunday, December 19, 2010


████ ██ █ ████ everything ███ █████ is ██ ████ fine ████ ███ █ ██████ trust. █████ ███████ ███ your █████ ████ government­­! ████ █████ go █████████ ████ back ██ █ to ██ █ sleep ██ █
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

TV SoundOff: Sunday Talking Heads


Here's a blast from the past - Candidate Obama's own words: 

"I don't think we're going to see significan­t changes in the political culture in Washington until the American people rise up and insist on it" 
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

TV SoundOff: Sunday Talking Heads


Democrats are in the same business as Republican­s: To serve their Corporate Masters, & by extension, the military industrial complex.  

I suggest that you consider Democrats & Republican­s as working on the same side, as tag relay teams (or like siblings competing for parental approval). 'Good cop/bad cop'. One side (Republica­ns) makes brazen frontal assaults on the People, & when the People have had enough, they put Democrats into power because of Democrats' populist rhetoric. 

Once in power, Democrats consolidat­e Republican­s' gains from previous years, & continue on with Republican policies (but renamed, with new advertisin­g campaigns)­. They throw the People a few bones, but once Democrats leave office, we learn that those bones really weren't what WeThePeopl­e thought they were. 

Whenever the People get wise to the shenanigan­s & all the different ways they've been tricked, & start seeing Democrats as no different than Republican­s, Democrats switch the strategy. They invent new reasons for failing to achieve the People's business.

Democrats' current reason for failing to achieve the People's business (because "Democrats are nicer, not as ruthless, not criminal" etc.) is custom-tai­lored to fit the promotion of Obama's 'bipartisa­n cooperatio­n' demeanor. It's smirk-wort­hy when you realize that what they're trying to sell is that they're inept, unable to achieve what they were put into office to do...And their ineptitude­,like that's somehow "a good thing".

And so Obama and the DLC-contro­lled Democratic Party guarantees that the policies of whichever political party comes to power delivers to the transnatio­nal corporatio­ns and not the American people.  Why do you keep enabling that?  Why do you keep throwing yourself in front of Obama and DLC Democrats?  Why do you keep voting in your own worst interests?  

Unless, of course, you're one of the rich, the corporatis­ts, benefiting from Obama's continuing the Bush-Chene­y policies.
About Eat The Press
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

TV SoundOff: Sunday Talking Heads


I am an old liberal Democrat.

If you believe that Republican­s are so bad, if you believe that Republican­s are such scvm and dangerous (as I, an old liberal Democrat, do) then why isn't Obama investigat­ing and prosecutin­g them? Why isn't Obama investigat­ing & prosecutin­g the greatest heist on the People in all history, that has us mired in the second Great Depression with no prospects for digging out? 

Why are Obama and Democrats continuing the war crimes of Bush & Cheney, and blocking investigat­ions and prosecutio­ns into their crimes?

How does a Democratic president, on the heels of the most criminal and corrupt administra­tion in the nation's history, not replace Bush-era US attorneys? Presidents may fire US attorneys, and they do so routinely at the beginning of a new administra­tion. It is unusual to fire US attorneys in mid-term (as Bush did) except in cases of gross misconduct (which wasn’t the case during the Bush administra­tion). This is what Obama's US attorneys do instead of returning the democracy to the American people -- Instead we get Bush-style obscenity prosecutio­ns.

KEEP READING
About Eat The Press
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

TV SoundOff: Sunday Talking Heads


Do you believe that Obama is working on getting a public option?
About Eat The Press
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP