A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

'Furious' Obama Explains Oil Spill Frustration To Larry King (VIDEO): 'Venting' Won't Solve Anything, Says Obama

Friday, June 4, 2010


"Even if that 3o-day excuse were true, it reflects very poorly on the administration. But as The Washington Post, in a good piece of reporting, noted on Tuesday: that excuse is false. An appellate court in 2008 rejected the 30-day interpretation now being asserted by Obama officials everywhere. That 9th Circuit ruling, in the case of Alaska Wilderness League, et al. v. Kempthorne, is really quite instructive to read, both because it illustrates how false is the excuse of Obama officials and, more generally, because of what it reveals about how completely co-opted MMS regulators are by the oil industry.



In that case, numerous environmental groups sued in order to challenge the Bush Interior Department's approval of a Shell Oil plan to drill multiple offshore exploratory oil wells over a three-year period in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. This is what happens frequently: environmental groups have to sue in order to prevent the Interior Department and the oil industry from working jointly to circumvent Congressional regulations for drilling projects. Just as was true for the BP Deepwater Horizon project, MMS in the Shell case had issued an exemption from the legal requirement that an environmental impact study be conducted before the drilling project could be approved, notwithstanding numerous, serious concerns raised even by Bush Interior Department officials about the impact of the Shell project."



KEEP READING
About Gulf Oil Spill
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

'Furious' Obama Explains Oil Spill Frustration To Larry King (VIDEO): 'Venting' Won't Solve Anything, Says Obama


Glenn Greenwald's reaction when he heard Obama's excuse was similar to mine:



"That excuse made very little sense to me as soon as I heard it. It seems highly unlikely that Congress -- which is not exactly notorious for imposing excessively rigorous regulations on the oil industry -- would enact a statutory requirement which, self-evidently, would be too rigorous to meet. But even if that were true -- even if Congress really did impose an impossible-to-meet 30-day period for conducting environmental reviews -- why didn't the Obama adminstration, whose party controls the Congress, ever ask that the law be amended to provide 6o or 90 days, or however much time is needed to complete the review? Or why didn't Interior officials tell the oil industry that they would refuse to issue these permits until the industry had their lobbyists instruct Congress to change the law to allow for a more reasonable timeframe? Instead, faced with a supposedly impossible-to-meet statutory requirement of conducting environmental reviews, the Interior Department just threw its hands up and circumvented the spirt of the law by oh-so-reluctantly and helplessly handing out exemptions like candy to any oil company that asked? Is that at all believable?"



KEEP READING
About Gulf Oil Spill
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

'Furious' Obama Explains Oil Spill Frustration To Larry King (VIDEO): 'Venting' Won't Solve Anything, Says Obama


Yes, but as the court has ruled, it's not true and the court condemned Obama's excuse.



It's also yet another instance of Congress conspiring with corporations (this time Big Oil) to provide cover and shift responsibility, give a c0ck&bull story to the public about why oil companies are able to drill environmentally unsound wells (as if the public wouldn't realize that this law wasn't dropped down from the sky by tooth fairies).
About Gulf Oil Spill
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

'Furious' Obama Explains Oil Spill Frustration To Larry King (VIDEO): 'Venting' Won't Solve Anything, Says Obama


Do you remember Obama's excuse at last week's press conference about why his Interior Department issued exemptions to BP:



"[T]here is a thorough environmental review as to whether a certain portion of the Gulf should be leased or not. . . . .Under current law, the Interior Department has only 30 days to review an exploration plan submitted by an oil company. That leaves no time for the appropriate environmental review. The result is, they're continually waived. And this is just one example of a law that was tailored by the industry to serve their needs instead of the public's."



Only it's not true.



http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/06/03/salazar/index.html



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/31/AR2010053103126.html?hpid=topnews
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Gibbs Ducks Crucial Question On Sestak, Romanoff Job Offers


Then there's this: Obama's excuse at last week's press conference about why his Interior Department issued exemptions to BP:



"[T]here is a thorough environmental review as to whether a certain portion of the Gulf should be leased or not. . . . .Under current law, the Interior Department has only 30 days to review an exploration plan submitted by an oil company. That leaves no time for the appropriate environmental review. The result is, they're continually waived. And this is just one example of a law that was tailored by the industry to serve their needs instead of the public's."



Only it's not true.



http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/06/03/salazar/index.html



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/31/AR2010053103126.html?hpid=topnews
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Gibbs Ducks Crucial Question On Sestak, Romanoff Job Offers


That is pretty much standard operating procedure for Obama. Rarely a day goes by where something 'Bushy' isn't being done by him or his administration, and then he'll l!e about it.



If pushed, if the media follows up and there is a public outcry, Obama may relent (like today after it was learned drilling was resuming in the Gulf, Obama allegedly reversed course, issued a moratorium on ALL drilling in the Gulf, but then Ken Salazar and the new head of MMS said, "Not true", so now we're back to mixed messages & conflicting information coming out of his administration.



On top of it comes the news that BP, which should be preparing to close up shop & it's officers packing a toothbrush for prison, is instead going ahead with plans to drill in the arctic.



KEEP READING
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Gibbs Ducks Crucial Question On Sestak, Romanoff Job Offers


MomMakingChange is uninformed and wants to remain so, for whatever reason. I don't think she can be swayed by any argument; she's going to have to learn the hard way, as most of us have.



MomMakingChange probably doesn't know that on the same day that the Obama administration announced it was reversing the Bush era intensive logging plan and restoring protection for old growth forests and the species that depend on them in western Oregon, Obama had (with no publicity or fanfare) ordered the clear-cutting (the most destructive of all harvesting methods) of an old growth national forest in Alaska -

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/16/obama-administration-appr_n_235311.html



KEEP READING
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP