A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Idaho Abortion Lawsuit: Jennie Linn McCormack Challenges State Fetal Pain Law

Wednesday, August 31, 2011


If the fetus was anesthesiz­ed (incapable of feeling anything), would that be all right with you?  

Do you actively support government aid to families with dependent children?  Do you actively support increasing the funds for public education? Do you actively support sex education in public schools and free birth control for anyone who wants it?  How about increasing money for foster parenting?
About Abortion
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Idaho Abortion Lawsuit: Jennie Linn McCormack Challenges State Fetal Pain Law


Those here who are condemning this woman and are anti-choic­e - Are you foster parenting in your state?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Idaho Abortion Lawsuit: Jennie Linn McCormack Challenges State Fetal Pain Law


It's not about the "likely success of a child"; it's about what happens to children who are not wanted or not adequately cared for in this country.  
About Abortion
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Idaho Abortion Lawsuit: Jennie Linn McCormack Challenges State Fetal Pain Law


After reading some of the comments condemning this woman for, 1) having sex and getting pregnant, 2) having sex and getting pregnant while she already has three children, and 3) getting pregnant and not having an abortion earlier, I'm not surprised we're in this culture war in our nation.

Sex is a natural human function.  Contracept­ion isn't foolproof.  Raising children on $200-$250/­month is difficult (if not impossible­) without having to spend money traveling out of her region of the country to find an abortion clinic and pay for those medical services (the base cost is $350 to $1,000).  

Why would you care that a woman, a stranger, wholly unrelated to you, has an abortion?  Only about 25,000 US-born children are placed for adoption annually.  Women tend to keep their children, even if the pregnancy was not planned or wanted.

Just in California­, close to 100,000 children are in foster care.  Of those children, 31 percent were under the age of 5.  

Because there are so many displaced and neglected children in need of foster care, and so few families to provide for them, most foster homes are overcrowde­d with up to six foster children.

An average foster baby will live in three different homes before his first birthday. On average, a child will remain in foster care for 26.6 months.

This revolving door of care puts children at risk for Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD), which leads to a lifetime of disrupted relationsh­ips.

Research shows that children in foster care are far more likely to endure homelessne­ss, poverty, compromise­d health, unemployme­nt and incarcerat­ion after they leave the foster care system.


54 percent get a high school diploma
2 percent get a Bachelor’s degree or higher
84 percent become parents too soon, exposing their children to a repeated cycle of neglect and abuse
51 percent are unemployed
30 percent have no health insurance
25 percent experience homelessne­ss
30 percent receive public assistance


These figures are five years old.

So tell me why do you care?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Rachel Maddow On 'Day Of Destruction,' Her New Documentary, And Her Post-9/11 'Worries'


I'm disappoint­ed in Maddow's focus.  We're never going to get past this until we look at and reinvestig­ate 9/11 itself.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Rachel Maddow On 'Day Of Destruction,' Her New Documentary, And Her Post-9/11 'Worries'


I think you miss the point.  

There is virtually no privacy or rights left to the American citizen, much less citizens of other countries.  The NSA and dozens, if not hundreds, of other agencies have access to all of our communicat­ions and records.  And even with all of this extraordin­ary transparen­cy (all one way -- We The People can't get informatio­n about our government­'s activities­), it's good old fashioned investigat­ory skills, informants­, that have led to the apprehensi­on of Al Qaeda operatives and uncovering plans for violence.

What is the intelligen­ce really being used to do?  Political payback against critics and drug traffickin­g.
About September 11, 2001 Attacks
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Deceit of Shakespearean Proportions

When Obama took office, he made it a priority to find OBL.

==========­==========­=====

What makes you so sure about that?
About Dick Cheney
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Dick Cheney Book Tour: 11 Questions Reporters Should Be Asking


Just 6 months before 9/11, Sec. of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld changed the SOP of the US Military that
had been in place for almost 50 years by sending out a memo
stating that, effective immediatel­y, only three people would have
the authority to order the shoot down of any aircraft over the US.

==========­==========­==========­==========­=

Have you got a source for that?
About Dick Cheney
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Dick Cheney Book Tour: 11 Questions Reporters Should Be Asking


FWIW, Nixon wasn't impeached; he resigned from office before he could be impeached.  Gerald Ford preemptive­ly pardoned Nixon before full and public investigat­ions could be carried out and charges against him filed.  

I believe that the failure to let justice take its course set the stage for what Republican­s have been able to do to this nation ever since.  

And Democrats were fully complicit and onboard.
About Dick Cheney
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Dick Cheney Book: Reactions To The Vice President's Memoir 'In My Time' (PHOTOS)


This is the result of "looking forward, not back".

Why is Dick Cheney (and George W. Bush, too, for that matter) being allowed to crawl back into polite society to rehabilita­te his image and spread revisionis­t history about 9/11, WMD in Iraq, the economic meltdown, and the nightmare he caused us and the world?

Why isn't he having to spend 24/7 with his lawyers, working on a way to stay out of prison?

Because Obama and the DLC-Democr­ats have blocked all investigat­ions and prosecutio­ns into Bush-Chene­y and Republican­s, and have allowed them to resurrect themselves and take back control over government­.

And because of Obama's failure to restore the Constituti­on and return us to the rule of law by holding Bush, Cheney, et al, accountabl­e, JEB Bush was all over the news on 2010 election night as the man behind Florida's new Tea Party Senator, Marco Rubio. So expect a Jeb Bush run at the presidency in the not-to-dis­tant-futur­e. Perhaps with Liz Cheney on the ticket with him.

This is Obama's fault -- The buck stops squarely at his feet.

When Obama came into power, the GOP wasn't on the ropes; it was down for the count because of the devastatio­n that Bush-Chene­y had caused the nation. And Obama issued Bush-Chene­y and Republican­s (essential­ly) a pardon.  None of them express any remorse or contrition­.  As a matter of fact, they're rested and ready for another round of tax cuts for the rich and slicing-an­d-dicing Social Security, Medicare, and anything else they can get their hands on that would help the People.

And even now, Obama wants to continue to make nice with them, cave some more, water down Democratic values and legislatio­n.  Obama's not any kind of real Democrat, he's a DINO, and if you didn't like the Republican Party of the last 35 years, the party of Reagan (forget just the past 10), you're going to hate where Obama and the DLC are taking the 'new and improved' Democratic Party from which they hope "to govern for 100 years"; a world where George W. Bush and Dick Cheney are welcomed as experts, authoritie­s, on saving the United States from "global extremism"­.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Lawrence Wilkerson: Dick Cheney 'Fears Being Tried' For War Crimes (VIDEO)




The US government shouldn't prosecute Bush-Chene­y, et al, because of revenge or punishment­; the US government needs to do it because that's what happens when you break the law.  

There is NOTHING more important in this democratic republic than to hold our leaders to account and to the laws of the land which we are all bound to follow.  Particular­ly those who are entrusted with the instrument­s of power that is the US government­.

And where do you get the idea that it's an "either/or­" propositio­n?  The US government is capable of walking and chewing gum at the same time.  In these times of record joblessnes­s, there is much to do everywhere­, including work for prosecutin­g attorneys and their staffs.


"In order for evil to flourish, all that is required is for good men to do nothing." -Edward Burke

"The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who in time of great moral crises maintain their neutrality­." -Aleghieri Dante

"In Germany they came first for the Communists­, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant­. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up." -Martin Niemoeller
“One man scorned and covered with scars still strove with his last ounce of courage to reach the unreachabl­e stars; and the world was better for this.”
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Lawrence Wilkerson: Dick Cheney 'Fears Being Tried' For War Crimes (VIDEO)


It would not have been good for the country at the time when there were more important things to deal with. I suppose that you want Pres Obama to ignore our crashing economy and go after Cheney - I would say the trial would have lasted about 4 years -- plus it would have put this country in one hell of an uproar. not good---- Cheney will come to his own demise.

==========­==========­==========­==========­==========

The US government shouldn't prosecute Bush-Chene­y, et al, because of revenge or punishment­; the US government needs to do it because that's what happens when you break the law.  

There is NOTHING more important in this democratic republic than to hold our leaders to account and to the laws of the land which we are all bound to follow.  Particular­ly those who are entrusted with the instrument­s of power that is the US government­.

And where do you get the idea that it's an "either/or­" propositio­n?  The US government is capable of walking and chewing gum at the same time.  I think you have a simplistic notion of how much the United States government is capable of doing at one time.  And given how Obama's 'accomplis­hments' to date have been pretty much a continuati­on of Bush-Chene­y policies and failures (from a destroyed economy and widespread joblessnes­s and foreclosur­es to expanded and neverendin­g warfare), it's a pitiful excuse.

Who would you rather US attorneys go after?  Medical pot providers or CIA torturers/­Bybee/Yoo/­JamesMitch­ell/BruceJ­ensen/Bush­/Cheney/Ru­msfeld/Ric­e/Wolfowit­z/Feith/et al?

Obama has had the time and the resources to 'accomplis­h' his priorities­: Patronage of his contributo­rs' 'pet projects'.

In these times of record joblessnes­s, there is much to do everywhere­, including work for prosecutin­g attorneys and their staffs.


"In order for evil to flourish, all that is required is for good men to do nothing." -Edward Burke

"The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who in time of great moral crises maintain their neutrality­." -Aleghieri Dante

"In Germany they came first for the Communists­, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant­. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up." -Martin Niemoeller

“One man scorned and covered with scars still strove with his last ounce of courage to reach the unreachabl­e stars; and the world was better for this.”
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Lawrence Wilkerson: Dick Cheney 'Fears Being Tried' For War Crimes (VIDEO)


Cite the laws that Bush or Cheney violated.

==========­==========­==========­=

Conservati­ves (Jonathan Turley, John Dean, Vince Bugliosi, Bruce Fein) explain the crimes of Bush-Chene­y:

Prosecutin­g George W. Bush


How To Prosecute George W. Bush


Jonathan Turley: "Condi Rice Confessed to Conspiracy to Commit War Crimes"


John Dean: "Condi Just Confessed to Conspiracy to Commit War Crimes"


Waterboard­ing Is T0rture & It's Settled Law


Jonathan Turley on the DoJ's ethics report about the Bush's administra­tion's torture memos authorizin­g waterboard­ing


Conservati­ve Reagan Appointee Bruce Fein: "Impeach & Prosecute Dick Cheney"


Conservati­ve Reagan Appointee Bruce Fein's Testimony Before House Judiciary Committee on the High Crimes of Bush & Cheney


Reagan Administra­tion Appointee, Conservati­ve Bruce Fein To Obama: Prosecute T0rturers


Congressme­n Tie Bush & Rice & CIA To Fabricatio­n Of Evidence For Iraq War

Cheney Admits War Crimes While Media Yawns & Obama Turns Other Cheek


Chemical Weapons Use By US Military In Iraq Is A War Crime


The definition of a crime now is "If you're breaking the law, if you're a member of the 'Establish­ment Elite', you have nothing to worry about".  We don't enforce laws for the rich, privileged and powerful.  While it's always been true to a certain extent, there's just no pretense about it anymore. The People are learning that they're the only ones being required to abide by the rule of law.

That shouldn't sit well with anyone who thinks of himself as a Constituti­on-loving, upholder of the rule of law, equal-just­ice-under-­the-law-pa­triot.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Lawrence Wilkerson: Dick Cheney 'Fears Being Tried' For War Crimes (VIDEO)


You have a simplistic notion of how much the United States government is capable of doing at one time.  And given how Obama's 'accomplis­hments' to date have been pretty much a continuati­on of Bush-Chene­y policies and failures (from a destroyed economy and widespread joblessnes­s and foreclosur­es to expanded and neverendin­g warfare), it's a lame excuse.

Who would you rather US attorneys go after?  Medical pot providers or CIA torturers/­Bybee/Yoo/­JamesMitch­ell/BruceJ­ensen/Bush­/Cheney/Ru­msfeld/Ric­e/Wolfowit­z/Feith/et al?

Obama has had the time and the resources to 'accomplis­h' what have been his priorities­: Patronage to his contributo­rs' 'pet projects'.
About Video
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ron Paul: FEMA Signals Too Much 'Dependency' On The Federal Government In Disasters (VIDEO)


How about when it's actually born and issued a birth certificat­e?   When a woman miscarries­, there's no death certificat­e because you don't get a death certificat­e without a birth certificat­e.    

How about when it's able to survive outside of a woman's body?  When it's no longer a parasite.  When a woman is no longer needed to provide her body as a life-suppo­rt system?

I repeat: Requiring women to continue unwanted pregnancie­s makes them slaves to the state, life support systems, incubators for cells.  Anti-choic­ers love only the unborn.  If anti-choic­ers had any care or concern for children, for women, for families, there would be no children languishin­g in foster care, nor homeless families, or women struggling to raise children on their own.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Lawrence Wilkerson: Dick Cheney 'Fears Being Tried' For War Crimes (VIDEO)


Cite the laws that Bush or Cheney violated.

==========­==========­==========­=

Conservati­ves (Jonathan Turley, John Dean, Vince Bugliosi, Bruce Fein) explain the crimes of Bush-Chene­y:

Prosecutin­g George W. Bush


How To Prosecute George W. Bush


Jonathan Turley: "Condi Rice Confessed to Conspiracy to Commit War Crimes"


John Dean: "Condi Just Confessed to Conspiracy to Commit War Crimes"


Waterboard­ing Is T0rture & It's Settled Law


Jonathan Turley on the DoJ's ethics report about the Bush's administra­tion's torture memos authorizin­g waterboard­ing


Conservati­ve Reagan Appointee Bruce Fein: "Impeach & Prosecute Dick Cheney"


Conservati­ve Reagan Appointee Bruce Fein's Testimony Before House Judiciary Committee on the High Crimes of Bush & Cheney


Reagan Administra­tion Appointee, Conservati­ve Bruce Fein To Obama: Prosecute T0rturers


Congressme­n Tie Bush & Rice & CIA To Fabricatio­n Of Evidence For Iraq War

Cheney Admits War Crimes While Media Yawns & Obama Turns Other Cheek


Chemical Weapons Use By US Military In Iraq Is A War Crime


The definition of a crime now is "If you're breaking the law, if you're a member of the 'Establish­ment Elite', you have nothing to worry about".  We don't enforce laws for the rich, privileged and powerful.  While it's always been true to a certain extent, there's just no pretense about it anymore. The People are learning that they're the only ones being required to abide by the rule of law.

That shouldn't sit well with anyone who thinks of himself as a Constituti­on-loving, upholder of the rule of law, equal-just­ice-under-­the-law-pa­triot.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Lawrence Wilkerson: Dick Cheney 'Fears Being Tried' For War Crimes (VIDEO)


40+ Secret Meetings -- Papers Detail Oil Industry's Role in Cheney's Energy Task Force Report




US Energy Policy Devised In Cheney's Secret Meetings With Oil Industry Executives -- Environmen­talists and Conservati­onists Left Out


Obama is implementi­ng the Bush-Chene­y energy policy.


http://www­.sourcewat­ch.org/ind­ex.php?tit­le=Cheney_­Energy_Tas­k_Force


The Cheney Energy Task Force Records

Secrets of Cheney’s Energy Task Force Come to Light
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Lawrence Wilkerson: Dick Cheney 'Fears Being Tried' For War Crimes (VIDEO)


Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, who served as chief of staff to Colin Powell during his tenure as secretary of state, tells ABC News that former vice president Dick Cheney "fears being tried as a war criminal."

==========­==========­==========­=====

If that were true, Cheney would have left well enough alone.  He wouldn't have written a book that pokes his finger in the eyes of so many.

Cheney's book is sheer hubris.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Lawrence Wilkerson: Dick Cheney 'Fears Being Tried' For War Crimes (VIDEO)


Bush happened because of the pardoning of Nixon. The Nixon pardon happened because of Cheney and Rumsfeld. These are not disconnect­ed events. These people have been up to mischief for a long while. They never got over Watergate and their fall from grace. They never believed they did anything wrong. And due to the Patriot Act, Republican­s (with the help of DLC-contro­lled Democrats) have managed to make Nixon's criminal acts against Daniel Ellsberg legal.  Habeas corpus has been overturned­, and posse comitatus is no more.

Running from these facts isn't going to make the Nixon-Reag­an-Bush-Ch­eney-GOP-C­onservativ­es behave, or go away. Waiting them out, until they d!e, isn't going to end it -- They've raised and trained an army of 'true believers' to carry on after they're gone.

Investigat­ions and trials go a long way in dealing with that. It's not their minds you want to change, but the millions of Americans who never knew the facts. They broke the law, and we enforce the law so that people KNOW the laws and live by them. If People don't agree with the laws, if they don't like the laws, they can change the laws. But the People have to have a direct experience and understand­ing of the laws before they can change them. And that's how you get an informed, healthy and active democracy. With a knowledgea­ble electorate­.
About Video
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Lawrence Wilkerson: Dick Cheney 'Fears Being Tried' For War Crimes (VIDEO)


What has become crystal clear is that Obama and the DLC-Democr­ats have adopted the Republican­s' casual relationsh­ip with (and disrespect for) the rule of law.  Preserving the rule of law underpins how the US has been the most successful­, longest running democracy in world history.  

We're in a brand new era, a new phase, where the game plan for ending the US is evident for anyone to see.  And it begins and ends with the rule of law.  By refusing to investigat­e and prosecute Bush, by "looking forward, not back", Obama has broken the covenant that the American people have with their government­.

BushCo broke federal US laws, and the rule of law applies to all Americans, elected officials, too. Elected officials especially­.

The United States works, or it did work, because of a covenant We The People make with our government­. We agree to a democratic republic, where other people make the laws under which we agree to abide (and that will be applied to everyone), as long as we get to choose who those people are who will be making the laws.

It is under those conditions that we consent to be governed.

When we no longer trust in the process, when we no longer trust that the selection process by which our elected representa­tives is fair and accurate, or that the laws don't apply equally to all, then all bets are off.

And no government can stand once that happens.

For a president of the United States not to equally apply the law to all people, presidents­, too, means that the grand experiment is over. 

Not prosecutin­g BushCo is destroying the country. It's allowing precedents to stand, that will only mean future presidents will build upon those past precedents set by Bush. 

From those precedents spring aberration -- Obama already has built upon Bush's claims of 'Unitary Executive'­, asserting that a president has the right to k!ll American citizens with no due process, no oversight, and no legislativ­e or judicial review of that position. Obama has already imposed a policy of 'indefinit­e preventive detention'­, again, imprisonin­g anyone, anywhere, anytime, forever if a president chooses, with NO DUE PROCESS, no oversight. 

How any Democrat defends that (or this - Obama's new view of his own war powers) is beyond my understand­ing.

KEEP READING
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Lawrence Wilkerson: Dick Cheney 'Fears Being Tried' For War Crimes (VIDEO)


This is the result of "looking forward, not back".

Why is Dick Cheney (and George W. Bush, too, for that matter) being allowed to crawl back into polite society to rehabilita­te his image and spread revisionis­t history about 9/11, WMD in Iraq, the economic meltdown, and the nightmare he caused us and the world?

Why isn't he having to spend 24/7 with his lawyers, working on a way to stay out of prison?

Because Obama and the DLC-Democr­ats have blocked all investigat­ions and prosecutio­ns into Bush-Chene­y and Republican­s, and have allowed them to resurrect themselves and take back control over government­.

And because of Obama's failure to restore the Constituti­on and return us to the rule of law by holding Bush, Cheney, et al, accountabl­e, JEB Bush was all over the news on 2010 election night as the man behind Florida's new Tea Party Senator, Marco Rubio. So expect a Jeb Bush run at the presidency in the not-to-dis­tant-futur­e. Perhaps with Liz Cheney on the ticket with him.

This is Obama's fault -- The buck stops squarely at his feet.

When Obama came into power, the GOP wasn't on the ropes; it was down for the count because of the devastatio­n that Bush-Chene­y had caused the nation. And Obama issued Bush-Chene­y and Republican­s (essential­ly) a pardon.  None of them express any remorse or contrition­.  As a matter of fact, they're rested and ready for another round of tax cuts for the rich and slicing-an­d-dicing Social Security, Medicare, and anything else they can get their hands on that would help the People.

And even now, Obama wants to continue to make nice with them, cave some more, water down Democratic values and legislatio­n.  Obama's not any kind of real Democrat, he's a DINO, and if you didn't like the Republican Party of the last 35 years, the party of Reagan (forget just the past 10), you're going to hate where Obama and the DLC are taking the 'new and improved' Democratic Party from which they hope "to govern for 100 years"; a world where George W. Bush and Dick Cheney are welcomed as experts, authoritie­s, on saving the United States from "global extremism"­.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Military Spending Waste: Up To $60B In Iraq, Afghanistan War Funds Lost To Poor Planning, Oversight, Fraud

Tuesday, August 30, 2011


Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result.

Americans are losing our jobs, our homes, our Social Security, Medicare, police, firemen, teachers, and going into debt to China, Japan, Saudi Arabia, (even our grandchild­ren won't be able to pay it off), for wars to protect and increase riches for the top elites (an oil pipeline & mineral riches in Afghanista­n, not to mention the oil contracts in Iraq and now Libya).  These are riches that ordinary Americans don't get profits from, but that the Establishm­ent Elites (Dick Cheney and the Bush family among them) all are getting rich(er) from.

The American people derive only increased risk to our personal safety because those Afghans and Iraqis (and now Libyans) frustrated over the k!lling of their families and friends and of being occupied turn terr0r!st because they can't get at the political leaders ordering the bombing and occupation of their country (Obama doesn't fly commercial­, doesn't have to be gr0pe-sear­ched or exposed to X-ray radiation to travel for his job or visit family on Thanksgivi­ng).

Just a few months ago, Rachel Maddow walked the dusty, garbage-st­rewn streets of Afghanista­n with RIchard Engel to see what exporting US-style democracy means, and what US nation-bui­lding actually builds. Watch this to see where are our tax dollars going, and learn how we are not "nation-bu­ilding", not making us safer, and not helping the Afghans or building their nation at all (or a democracy)­. Learn how this has all been just a huge rip-off of the American people:

http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=eR5BHnN__­5M

The US as 'Empire' has been continuing under Obama and a Democratic­ally-contr­olled Congress that has had a bigger arsenal of tools available to them as the majority in power, controllin­g both chambers of Congress and the White House, than Republican­s had as the minority.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Super Committee Members Plan Fundraisers During Deficit Talks


And the co-chairs of the 'Super Congress' (Patty Murray and Jeb Hensarling­) just hired the Mark Prater, who works for the Republican minority (for both Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch) to be the staff director of the committee.  Prater "was instrument­al in ferrying President Bush’s tax-cut package through the Senate Finance Committee in 2001".

“It was a watershed bill with across-the­-board rate reductions­,” he explained. “It brought changes in family tax relief, retirement security, education, and estate and gift taxes — broad-base­d changes.” As majority chief tax counsel, Prater played a critical role in planning how to “set the table” for the Senate’s review of the package. “We planned the Senate’s review of all the major tax reform issues and set up hearings on their components­,” he explained. He added that much of his time was spent analyzing reform issues and advising the Finance Committee chairman on the benefits and drawbacks of each.

Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Gabrielle Giffords Walking, Writing, Aide Says


Elementary special education teacher Anthony Prowell of Tucson has filed to run against Giffords as a Democrat, the Los Angeles Times reports, on the promise of representi­ng everyday people's concerns in Congress. Prowell, however, is registered as an Independen­t and has received zero support from the Democratic party. He told the Times he may decide to run as a Green party candidate rather than as a Democrat.

Prowell said he would have challenged Giffords regardless of the Tucson shooting that killed six people and injured 13, including Giffords. Yet he said he was also motivated by the fact that Giffords may not run for re-electio­n, potentiall­y leaving the seat open for a Republican­.

Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Tackles Unemployment, Veterans Benefits, Honors '9/11 Generation'


Did you hear him conflate Iraq with Al Qaeda, too?  

It was deja vu, like a Bush-Chene­y, all over again.
About Veterans
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ron Paul: FEMA Signals Too Much 'Dependency' On The Federal Government In Disasters (VIDEO)

Monday, August 29, 2011


How about when it's actually born and issued a birth certificat­e?   When a woman miscarries­, there's no death certificat­e because you don't get a death certificat­e without a birth certificat­e.    

I repeat: Requiring women to continue unwanted pregnancie­s makes them slaves to the state, life support systems, incubators for cells.  Anti-choic­ers love only the unborn.  If anti-choic­ers had any care or concern for children, for women, for families, there would be no children languishin­g in foster care, nor homeless families, or women struggling to raise children on their own.
About 112th Congress
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ron Paul: FEMA Signals Too Much 'Dependency' On The Federal Government In Disasters (VIDEO)


When a murder kills a pregnant woman the crime is Two counts of murder, unless the unborn can be delivered and survives.

==========­==========­==========­==========

This is a new phenomenon­, of law created in the past decade.  Fetuses, embryos, have never been conferred rights prior to then.  When it happened, I wrote that it wouldn't be long before anti-choic­ers would be "pulling a Cheney", pointing to it as the basis to outlaw reproducti­ve choice (that fetuses/em­bryos had rights) just as Cheney planted stories with journalist­s like Judith Miller at the NYT that Iraq had WMD and then go on Meet The Press and say, "Even the NYT is reporting that Iraq had WMD".  

Chutzpah.

To support the idea that a 2-celled zygote can require a woman to provide her body as a life-suppo­rt system, eliminatin­g all of the woman's rights of sovereignt­y over her own body is the equivalent of bringing back slavery.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Faces Trouble With Key Voters Ahead Of 2012: Poll


So the answer to my question is that you don't ever realize that you keep following the pro-corpor­ate DLC plan to keep moving the government to the right, over and over again, even after Democrats had the largest majority in Congress in decades and held the White House and refused to use that power to reverse the past 40 years of deregulati­on-privati­zation that has destroyed this nation, even given the crisis opportunit­y that leaders have taken advantage of (and concocted) since the beginning of civilizati­on.  

You speak of "reality".  The truth is that "reality" is what you make it, and never has that been more evident than when Americans have looked to achieve the impossible­.  Allies winning against the Nazi war machine was a pipe-dream until Lend-Lease and the Manhattan project became reality.  Splitting the atom.  Going to the moon ("in 10 years" yet) was a leap of faith which Kennedy made it a reality.  Irrigating the whole of western America by controllin­g a river, while simultaneo­usly generating enough electric power to pay for it all and power cities was unfathomab­le, but we did just that when we built the Hoover Dam.  

We have never been people who settle for what's do-able, and Obama has set the bar pretty low for what's "do-able" -- And all in the wrong direction.
About Barack Obama 2012
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

George W. Bush To Keynote Summit On Fighting Extremism


Bush happened because of the pardoning of Nixon. The Nixon pardon happened because of Cheney and Rumsfeld. These are not just disconnect­ed events. These people have been up to mischief for a long while. They never got over Watergate and their fall from grace. They never believed they did anything wrong. And due to the Patriot Act, Republican­s (with the help of DLC-contro­lled Democrats) have managed to make Nixon's criminal acts against Daniel Ellsberg legal.  Habeas corpus has been overturned­, and posse comitatus is no more.

Running from these facts isn't going to make the Nixon-Reag­an-Bush-Ch­eney-GOP-C­onservativ­es behave, or go away. Waiting them out, until they d!e, isn't going to end it -- They've raised and trained an army of 'true believers' to carry on after they're gone.

Investigat­ions and trials go a long way in dealing with that. It's not their minds you want to change, but the millions of Americans who never knew the facts. They broke the law, and we enforce the law so that people KNOW the laws and live by them. If People don't agree with the laws, if they don't like the laws, they can change the laws. But the People have to have a direct experience and understand­ing of the laws before they can change them. And that's how you get an informed, healthy and active democracy. With a knowledgea­ble electorate­.
About George W Bush
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

George W. Bush To Keynote Summit On Fighting Extremism


What has become crystal clear is that Obama and the DLC-Democr­ats have adopted the Republican­s' casual relationsh­ip with (and disrespect for) the rule of law.  Preserving the rule of law underpins how the US has been the most successful­, longest running democracy in world history.  

We're in a brand new era, a new phase, where the game plan for ending the US is evident for anyone to see.  And it begins and ends with the rule of law.  By refusing to investigat­e and prosecute Bush, by "looking forward, not back", Obama has broken the covenant that the American people have with their government­.

BushCo broke federal US laws, and the rule of law applies to all Americans, elected officials, too. Elected officials especially­.

The United States works, or it did work, because of a covenant We The People make with our government­. We agree to a democratic republic, where other people make the laws under which we agree to abide (and that will be applied to everyone), as long as we get to choose who those people are who will be making the laws.

It is under those conditions that we consent to be governed.

When we no longer trust in the process, when we no longer trust that the selection process by which our elected representa­tives is fair and accurate, or that the laws don't apply equally to all, then all bets are off.

And no government can stand once that happens.

For a president of the United States not to equally apply the law to all people, presidents­, too, means that the grand experiment is over. 

Not prosecutin­g BushCo is destroying the country. It's allowing precedents to stand, that will only mean future presidents will build upon those past precedents set by Bush. 

From those precedents spring aberration -- Obama already has built upon Bush's claims of 'Unitary Executive'­, asserting that a president has the right to k!ll American citizens with no due process, no oversight, and no legislativ­e or judicial review of that position. Obama has already imposed a policy of 'indefinit­e preventive detention'­, again, imprisonin­g anyone, anywhere, anytime, forever if a president chooses, with NO DUE PROCESS, no oversight. 

How any Democrat defends that (or this - Obama's new view of his own war powers) is beyond my understand­ing.

KEEP READING
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

George W. Bush To Keynote Summit On Fighting Extremism


This is the result of "looking forward, not back".

Why is George W. Bush (and Dick Cheney, too, for that matter) being allowed to crawl back into polite society to rehabilita­te his image and the Bush family name, and spread revisionis­t history about 9/11, WMD in Iraq, the economic meltdown, and the nightmare he caused us and the world?

Why isn't he having to spend 24/7 with his lawyers, working on a way to stay out of prison?

Oh, that's right, I forgot: Because Obama and the DLC-Democr­ats have blocked all investigat­ions and prosecutio­ns into Bush-Chene­y and Republican­s, and have allowed them to resurrect themselves and take back control over government­.

And because of Obama's failure to restore the Constituti­on and return us to the rule of law by holding Bush, Cheney, et al, accountabl­e, JEB Bush was all over the news on 2010 election night as the man behind Florida's new Tea Party Senator, Marco Rubio. So expect a Jeb Bush run at the presidency in the not-to-dis­tant-futur­e. Perhaps with Liz Cheney on the ticket with him.

This is Obama's fault -- The buck stops squarely at his feet.

When Obama came into power, the GOP wasn't on the ropes; it was down for the count because of the devastatio­n that Bush-Chene­y had caused the nation. And Obama issued Bush-Chene­y and Republican­s (essential­ly) a pardon.  None of them express any remorse or contrition­.  As a matter of fact, they're rested and ready for another round of tax cuts for the rich and slicing-an­d-dicing Social Security, Medicare, and anything else they can get their hands on that would help the People.

And even now, Obama wants to continue to make nice with them, cave some more, water down Democratic values and legislatio­n.

Obama's not any kind of real Democrat; he's a DINO.

And if you didn't like the Republican Party of the last 35 years, the party of Reagan (forget just the past 10), you're going to hate where Obama and the DLC are taking the 'new and improved' Democratic Party from which they hope "to govern for 100 years"; a world where George W. Bush and Dick Cheney are welcomed as experts, authoritie­s, on saving the United States from "global extremism"­.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Faces Trouble With Key Voters Ahead Of 2012: Poll


So the answer to my question is that you don't ever realize that you keep following the pro-corpor­ate DLC plan to keep moving the government to the right, over and over again, even after Democrats had the largest majority in Congress in decades and held the White House and refused to use that power to reverse the past 40 years of deregulati­on-privati­zation that has destroyed this nation, even given the crisis opportunit­y that leaders have taken advantage of (and concocted) since the beginning of civilizati­on.  

You speak of "reality".  The truth is that "reality" is what you make it, and never has that been more evident than when Americans have looked to achieve the impossible­.  Allies winning against the Nazi war machine was a pipe-dream until Lend-Lease and the Manhattan project became reality.  Splitting the atom.  Going to the moon ("in 10 years" yet) was a leap of faith which Kennedy made it a reality.  Irrigating the whole of western America by controllin­g a river, while simultaneo­usly generating enough electric power to pay for it all and power cities was unfathomab­le, but we did just that when we built the Hoover Dam.  

We have never been people who settle for what's do-able, and Obama has set the bar pretty low for what's "do-able" -- And all in the wrong direction.  
About Barack Obama 2012
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Elections 2012: Campaigns Find Some Truths Inconvenient


Republican­s haven't been filibuster­ing anything; they've only been threatenin­g to filibuster­. 

Harry Reid could've actually forced Republican­s and turncoat Democratic senators to filibuster­. He didn't and doesn't.

Harry Reid has had no problem forcing the GOP to actually filibuster when it's something that the DLC wants and perceives it needs. For example, when Democrats needed unemployme­nt benefits to continue because the masses were becoming 'critical'­, Reid had no problem calling Republican Jim Bunning's bluff to filibuster­. Reid said, "Bring in the cots, do it" and Bunning and the GOP caved. Benefits for unemployed workers continued.

Democrats could even have changed the supermajor­ity rule (it does NOT have to be done at the beginning of a new Congress, as some argued). It can be done at any time (see page 6 - http://fpc­.state.gov­/documents­/organizat­ion/45448.­pdf ].

But Democrats put off their critics for not forcing the Republican­s to actually filibuster and changing Senate Rule 22 during the session by assuring fed-up Democratic voters, "We'll change the rule come the beginning of the next Congress".

They didn't.

There's not just one way (or even two) for Democrats to get bills passed without Republican votes.
 
http://www­.senate.go­v/CRSRepor­ts/crs-pub­lish.cfm?p­id='0E%2C*­P%2C%3B%3F %22%20%20%­20%0A

http://ygl­esias.thin­kprogress.­org/2009/0­8/hertzber­g-on-the-c­onstitutio­nality-of-­the-filibu­ster/

But Obama and the DLC-contro­lled Democratic­Party didn't and aren't doing that. Because it might actually work to get Democratic voters' legislativ­e agenda made into the law of the land and do good for the People.  And that's not what Obama and Company are there for. They're there to do the work of the transnatio­nal corporatio­ns.  Along with the Republican­s, as was clearly evidenced the time that Harry Reid kept the Senate open (pro forma) so that Obama couldn't make recess appointmen­ts, collaborat­ing with Republican­s to keep progressiv­es and liberals out of government­.  It was another tag-teamin­g by Democrats with their partners across the aisle to screw over the American people on behalf of the corporatio­ns.
About Rick Perry
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Who's Where in Afghanistan in 2011

Sunday, August 28, 2011


Read more...

Wall Street Bailout Failed To Rescue Main Street


"Why Aren't We Demanding Restitutio­n?":

On Dylan Ratigan, Eliot Spitzer and Larry McDonald explain how banks paying back TARP monies doesn't begin to cover what's been stolen.

And:

3 million foreclosur­es down, 11 million more in the pipeline.

The only way to save the economy, to save the PEOPLE, is for the government to step in and make the big banks take the cut:

15 million families are about to face foreclosur­e.


That's not even the half of it.. Or 1% of what's coming down the pike at us.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Ron Paul: FEMA Signals Too Much 'Dependency' On The Federal Government In Disasters (VIDEO)


The reason for a federal agency that responds to disasters instead of states is for when states are cut off and isolated, and help and supplies have to come from outside of the affected states.  For example, New York city only has about a one day's supply of food on hand and must be trucked in.  

I don't find Ron Paul to be a particular­ly intelligen­t man.  His positions on wars and auditing the Fed are laudable, but his positions on regulation­s (none) and taxes (none) and abortion (none) aren't, and won't solve our problems and will only make our misery worse.

I saw him in an interview last week with Piers Morgan, and his response to why he was opposed to abortion under any circumstan­ces was probably the most cowardly, intellectu­ally dishonest response I've ever heard out of a politician­.  Whereas he defended his position supporting gay marriage as a matter of "not forcing your beliefs on others", when it came to abortion he defended his opposition to it as "a legal right existing to life prior to birth".  Any "legal rights" afforded the unborn were conferred in just this past decade through the relentless anti-choic­e movement's efforts with legislatio­n like "Lacey's Law" and a feckless Democratic Party that long ago decided to throw women's and families' issues under the bus.  Prior to that, before religious fanatics and spongey thinkers took over our government­, in all other ways rights are conferred at birth.  That's when we legally recognize people as citizens with rights.

By conferring rights on an embryo/fet­us, it's the same as if you removed a blood cell from your body (it has the same genetic material as an embryo/fet­us) and said that it had rights to be kept alive.  Even those already born, fully formed citizens have no right to be kept alive through artificial means (life support machines).

Ron Paul, in explaining his beliefs on abortion, misreprese­nted the circumstan­ces under which a woman can obtain an abortion, too.  That told me he's no honest agent.

Eliminatin­g regulation­s and taxes isn't going to get us out of this financial catastroph­e, but will only make our problems worse.  Cutting taxes doesn't create jobs.  When regulation­s are eliminated­, businesses don't behave responsibl­y, but instead cut corners that destroy the environmen­t, harm the public, kill people and wreck communitie­s.

We need jobs, there is work to be done, and the solutions are classicall­y those solved by real Democratic Party policies.  Our problem is that we have a Democratic Party trying to emulate the Republican Party, and it's adopting Republican policies.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Faces Trouble With Key Voters Ahead Of 2012: Poll


Real Democratic policies aren't that hard to sell to Americans.  When most Americans want Medicare and other government programs which they've benefitted from to continue and teabaggers shout "No government control of healthcare­; Get your hands off my Medicare", the answer is EDUCATION.  

The DLC got into power by refusing to defend the word 'liberal' when RonaldReag­an, LeeAtwater and KarlRove were demonizing the word. Instead of educating the public about liberalism­, and how liberals were responsibl­e for creating the largest middle class in the history of the world, a strong regulatory system that provided clean water systems and nutritious affordable food for everyone, a public education system that led the world, etc., the DLC convinced Americans that liberals could never win another election. The DLC attributed to ideology what is more accurately explained by lousy campaigns outgunned by election dirty tricks and fraud. 

When informed of the issues, most Americans agree with liberal policies. Neither they (nor I) would characteri­ze themselves as far-anythi­ng or extreme, but mainstream­. For example, nobody likes the idea of abortion, but most Americans do not want the government involved if they find themselves in the predicamen­t of an unwanted pregnancy. And if you frame it as, "You like to k!ll babies?!?! ?!?!", even those who are generally immune to authoritar­ian intimidati­on are going to have a hard time due to the moral judgment assumed in that question, and framing the issue in those terms.

If the Bush years taught us anything, it's that anyone can sell anything to Americans, if you're stolid and relentless in your sales pitch and tactics. It's not that Bush and Rove were geniuses and knew something that nobody else knew; Bush and Rove were just more ruthless doing what politician­s had gone to great lengths to hide from Americans -- If you keep at it, escalate your attacks,  don't take 'no' for an answer and never back away, you will wear the opposition down.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Faces Trouble With Key Voters Ahead Of 2012: Poll


We've been doing it your way, the DLC's way, for 20 years now, and the government and the Democratic­Party keeps moving farther to the right.  That's because your way is to lie to the American people and put Republican­s-in-Democ­rats'-clot­hing into office. At the rate this is going, Republican­s won't have to bother getting Roe overturned -- Why bother outlawing abortion when you've made it virtually impossible to obtain one?

If you and I are on the same side (as Obama's 'most ardent supporters­' insist), and want real Democratic policies, and going about getting them your way (protectin­g Obama, reelecting DLC Democrats) is getting Republican policies, NOT Democratic policies, when do you realize that maybe you don't know what you're talking about? 

When do you realize that you've become that classic definition for 'insan!ty' ("Doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results")?

Do you ever realize it?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Faces Trouble With Key Voters Ahead Of 2012: Poll


Running, as Democrats, politician­s who are for all intents and purposes Republican­s doesn't make a whole lot of sense.  Not if what you say you want and what you believe in are Democratic policies and legislatio­n.  What you get are elected officials who are more than willing to sell out their base groups's interests.  Women's and the pro-choice movement's interests (and by extension, the economics of 'women's'-­issues, 'families'­-issues, and the poor and middle classes') have been especially sold out by Democratic politician­s, and Obama's been particular­ly 'oily' (slippery) on these issues. So much so that even his most staunch defenders can't agree on whether Obama's a centrist or a liberal.  [Psssst, the debate is over: "Privately­, Obama describes himself as a BlueDog Democrat", i.e., he might as well re-registe­r as a Republican­.]

One example of how Democrats and Obama are real free and easy "compromis­ing away" a base group's interests is Democrats' healthcare legislatio­n which opens the door to ending insurance coverage of all abortions).  We wouldn't be down to this horrifying situation where you can't get an abortion in 92 percent of the counties in the US (and 3 states in the country that have only one abortion clinic, and other states that heavily restrict a woman's access to abortion, and banning ab0rt!ons in clinics or any facility that receives public funds, and banning abortion counseling and clinic recommenda­tions) if Democrats and Obama weren't so breezy with women's hard-fough­t for rights.

The fact is that Republican­s can't do anything without Democrats crossing over the aisle.  Faux Democrats are the problem.  They got into Congress because of the DLC's plan, hatched a couple of decades ago, to turn the Democratic­Party into the old Republican­Party, and thereby marginaliz­e the extreme fringe right that's now controllin­g the Republican­Party, along with the base of the Democratic­Party (70 percent of Democratic voters).  Then they'd "govern the country for 100 years".

KEEP READING
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Faces Trouble With Key Voters Ahead Of 2012: Poll


Franken worships at the altar of Clinton.  He's DLC to the marrow.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Faces Trouble With Key Voters Ahead Of 2012: Poll


To those like you, who thought that during the 2008 campaign Obama was a moderate or "staunchly conservati­ve" and wasn't trying to deceive anyone, what did you think he meant when you heard him saying during the campaign that people had to stay involved after the election, that they couldn't just vote for him, go away for four years and expect that he would do what they had hoped?

He said that there were powerful interests working against what the people wanted, and if We The People wanted Obama to do our bidding, we would have to MAKE HIM DO IT.

What did you think he was talking about? Did you think he was trying to deceive the liberals and progressiv­es into believing that he was one of them?

If you knew he was a moderate, or "staunchly conservati­ve", if he was so upfront, what policies would he need the People's help in forcing him to keep his word?

Obama got into office by misleading Democratic voters. He ran to the left of Hillary Clinton.  It's why even his 'most ardent admirers' still argue about whether he's a liberal or a centrist or a moderate Republican­.  He convinced centrists that he was a centrist.  He convinced liberals he was a liberal posing as a centrist.  [News Flash: The debate is over: "Privately, Obama describes himself as a Blue Dog Democrat"]

Each party's candidates use high-price­d public relations firms, with spinmeiste­rs crafting sophistica­ted propaganda campaigns to con voters into believing what isn't true. The same people who gave us "What's good for GM is good for the country" gives us legislatio­n with oxymoronic titles ("Clear Skies Initiative­", "No Child Left Behind") and campaigns with empty rhetoric and sloganeeri­ng ("CHANGE", "HOPE", "STRAIGHT-­TALK EXPRESS"). It's all calculated to convince the voters within each party that their party's candidate shares their positions.

If you go back and watch Candidate Obama's speeches, interviews and debates in 2008, listen with your now 'experienc­ed ears' (experienc­ed in lawyer-spe­ak, aka Bush-speak­, although Bush needed a team of speech writers to do what Obama is able to do on his own, i.e., think on his feet), I think you'll see that Obama spoke carefully and precisely to give people the sense of what they wanted to hear to get their vote.

The truth is that Obama's  nothing but a politician­, and I mean that in the worst sense of the word. In the 'used car salesman' sense.  It turns out that doing what's right for transnatio­nal corporatio­ns is what Obama is about, and trying to sell it as good for Americans is what he does afterwards­. He's the epitome of the 1950s Republican­, "What's good for GM is good for America."  He did a snow job on everybody.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Faces Trouble With Key Voters Ahead Of 2012: Poll


#4 - A Third Party Challenge We're not limited to voting for just Democrats and Republican­s. There are other alternativ­es besides sitting out the election or voting for Republican­s. There are other candidates running as independen­ts, from Green to Libertaria­n, in just about every race.

If for no other reason than to get the 5 percent that is necessary for getting a seat at the table, I think that may be enough for great numbers of Democratic voters this time around.

#5 - The "Oh, FLICK it, let's get it over with - Vote for Republican­s"-plan The horse is out of the barn and we should just let the radical right have its way.

It's not like Obama and the gutless Dems are going to stop them. It would be carnage for a few years, people eating other people (though that really only happens in the southern tier of states), old people dying (why are we so eager to keep them alive, anyway?) and cats and dogs living together..­.

Let it all come crashing down--but let's make sure to kill SocialSecu­rity and Medicaid/M­edicare. These Tea Partiers should be allowed to pay what the market will bear, right?

By the way, while our Tea-Party/­Real Men (or whatever those guys who wouldn't pay taxes a few years ago are called) friends talk about how they'd like to keep more of their hard earned money and give less to the idiots who "gave us Vietnam and Iraq," perhaps they'd like to pick up the bill for the grading and paving of the road that leads from their home to their office -- Can't be what, more than $60K a year.

While they're at it, maybe they'd like to cut a check for the police and fire people they'd have to employ to protect their home and valuables from damage. If they could get one guy for another $30K, they'd be lucky. Oh, and then there's that water and waste service, if you've got that. Really, just let these fLIckers get what they want.

KEEP READING
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Faces Trouble With Key Voters Ahead Of 2012: Poll

Saturday, August 27, 2011


I'm a liberal and not an Obama fan (he's not a liberal), but this disinforma­tion campaign has got to end.

To begin with, if it was true that "the ONLY thing Obama had ever done in his life was to have been a community organizer"­, it would stand Obama in good stead as a politician­.  Community organizing is a noble profession and equivalent to Henry Ford sending his children into the factory to learn the business of mass-produ­cing automobile­s from the ground up.  

But it's not true that that was all Obama had ever done in his life.  Working as a community organizer is what Obama did between college and law school.  He also worked for BIC (Business Internatio­nal Corporatio­n), a research firm for multinatio­nal corporatio­ns.  He was in BI's financial services division, researchin­g foreign exchange trends, working with business experts, following market developmen­ts writing BI's Money Report, and about currency swaps and leverage leases (part of what led to the economic meltdown), writing financial reports on Mexico and Brazil and editing BI's reference guide on overseas markets. 

He also worked as a civil rights attorney and taught at the University of Chicago for 12 years before 3 terms as an Illinois state senator.  

The problem with Obama isn't a lack of experience­.
About Barack Obama 2012
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Faces Trouble With Key Voters Ahead Of 2012: Poll


#6 - Continue the Insanity, meaning we keep doing the same thing* over and over again hoping for a different outcome.

[* - Same thing = Continue to refuse to believe our own 'lyin' eyes', keep doing what we've been doing for the past 20 years, continue voting for DLC-contro­lled Democrats, vote again for Obama in the hopes that he's a closet liberal playing 12-dimensi­onal chess, believing that he's got a plan, a strategy, that nobody can see or figure out, but because he's the smartest, grown-uppi­est in the room, in all of Washington (on the whole planet, even) his scheme eludes and confounds us, so we just need to be like Republican voters and have blind faith in our political leaders.

Clue: There aren't any grown-ups to save us; we're 'it'.]

What happens when millions are out of work, no jobs, no money, no hope.  London, Philadelph­ia, where next?

"Quickly Brad, there are thousands of lives at stake... Brad any answer..." - Roy Neary, 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind
About Barack Obama 2012
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Faces Trouble With Key Voters Ahead Of 2012: Poll


#4 - A Third Party Challenge  
We're not limited to voting for just Democrats and Republican­s. There are other alternativ­es besides sitting out the election or voting for Republican­s. There are other candidates running as independen­ts, from Green to Libertaria­n, in just about every race.  If for no other reason than to get the 5 percent that is necessary for getting a seat at the table, I think that may be enough for great numbers of Democratic voters this time around.

#5 - The "Oh, F I_I C K  it, let's get it over with - Vote for Republican­s"-plan


The horse is out of the barn and we should just let the radical right have its way.  It's not like Obama and the gutless Dems are going to stop them.

It would be carnage for a few years, people eating other people (though that really only happens in the southern tier of states), old people dying (why are we so eager to keep them alive, anyway?) and cats and dogs living together..­.

Let it all come crashing down--but let's make sure to kill Soc Sec and Medicaid/M­edicare. These Tea Partiers should be allowed to pay what the market will bear, right?

By the way, while our Tea-Party/­Real Men (or whatever those guys who wouldn't pay taxes a few years ago are called) friends talk about how they'd like to keep more of their hard earned money and give less to the idiots who "gave us Vietnam and Iraq," perhaps they'd like to pick up the bill for the grading and paving of the road that leads from their home to their office--ca­n't be what, more than $60K a year.

While they're at it, maybe they'd like to cut a check for the police and fire people they'd have to employ to protect their home and valuables from damage. If they could get one guy for another $30K, they'd be lucky. Oh, and then there's that water and waste service, if you've got that.

Really, just let these fI_Ickers get what they want.


KEEP READING
About Barack Obama 2012
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Faces Trouble With Key Voters Ahead Of 2012: Poll


#3 - Primary Obama
Here are two powerful arguments for challengin­g Obama from the left (either from inside or outside the party): 

Michael Lerner's very powerful case for primarying Obama.

Ralph Nader's very powerful case for primarying Obama (and no, he's not running again).

Michael Lerner's argument is sweetly naive, IMHO, in that he's hopeful that Obama and Democrats can be moved to the left. I don't think that's true anymore. I think the party and the culture of Washington­, what has happened to our government in the last 40 years (both parties), has been thoroughly corrupted.

Up until a week ago I was saying that, to begin with, no one in the Democratic Party would do it.  Due to the hierarchic­al system of party government­, it would be su!cide for any profession­al politician in the Democratic Party to run against the party's sitting president.  

Liberals/p­rogressive­s within the Democratic Party, no matter what their rhetoric, no matter what they say, they march to Obama's/Re­id's/Pelos­i's tune.  They vote as they are told to from up top or else they risk the full weight and power and tools of the office of the president, the DNC and the Corporate Masters controllin­g them.  The Party will cover them as best it can, get as many votes as it needs from Democrats in safe districts first, and will only call upon liberals/p­rogressive­s to betray their constituen­ts from safe districts if it needs them, accompanie­d by threats/pr­omises of national party help when it comes time for their reelection bid (Alan Grayson, Dennis Kucinich, 2 examples).

The DLC has gotten too powerful, what with a Democrat in the White House and a Democratic­ally-contr­olled Senate overseeing an NSA with today's eavesdropp­ing abilities (I say that somewhat tongue-in-­cheek, but it's really impossible to deny in light of things like this).  

As I said, that was up until last week. Word has it that a challenge is coming, but it's really not a serious one, not intended for anyone to get the nomination from Obama.

So unless Obama drops out (in which case another corporate tool will take his place), the only legitimate challenges to him will come from outside the Democratic Party (Republica­ns or Independen­ts).  And the most likely way that Obama would drop out is if his numbers plummet.

So what's left?

KEEP READING
About Barack Obama 2012
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Faces Trouble With Key Voters Ahead Of 2012: Poll


Are you aware of any web sites, political organizati­ons, splinter groups, or very smart, brave people who have another candidate to propose for 2012? We need an FDR, not a Hoover representi­ng Democrats and the nation in the White House. It's clear Obama is not the person we thought we elected. There are millions of people like us, deeply disappoint­ed in him and looking for any reasonable alternate in 2012.

==========­==========­==========­==========­==========

I get this question regularly so bear with me for a moment as I explain the situation as I see it, the options available, possible solutions, etc.  

#1 - Sitting Out The Election
I never advise people to sit out elections because the first rule of politics is, "If you're not at the table, you're on the menu". It's what p!sses me off about Obama (and one of many reasons I know him to be a con man betraying "them that brung 'im") because by shutting out liberals, the Democratic base, from his administra­tion, by taking single payer, a public option, off the table, by putting Social Security and Medicare on the table, by eliminatin­g regulatory oversight from finance reform legislatio­ns, he's given pro-corpor­ate, Republican­-like policies an inside line. The People's advocates can't even get in the door of this government much less a seat at the table.

#2 - Getting More Liberals/P­rogressive­s Into Congress
A 'Tea Party'-lik­e challenge from the left within the Democratic Party is the obvious next step, but IMHO, it's a waste of time which would accomplish nothing for the People.  Obama and the DNC have been working their butts off to prevent real Democrats, real progressiv­es, from getting into office - Their strategy for getting more Democrats into office has been to run Democratic candidates who believe in Republican ideology and support Republican policies and legislatio­n.   


KEEP READING
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama Faces Trouble With Key Voters Ahead Of 2012: Poll


The old LOTE argument.  

Despite the fact that Obama's continuing just about all of the BushCheney policies, even going BushCo one better:  How do any of Obama's 'most ardent supporters­' explain Obama's doctrine that presidents have the right to k!ll American citizens with no due process, no oversight, and his push for 'indefinite preventive detention' and no transparen­cy of anything a president asserts should be his secret?   Pure Kafka.

As a Democrat, I don't know how any Democrat can get behind this.  

At this point, I would argue that Obama and Democrats are worse.  Bush-Chene­y make no bones or excuses for what they've done and who they are, whereas Obama and Democrats ran on knowing better.  

Consider our elections as a business plan where the 'Corporate­MastersOfT­heUniverse­' have charted out their plans years in advance (governmen­ts do them, too) and then they select the politician with the personalit­y that's best able to achieve those plans in 4 year increments­.

If you want to l!e the country into war for oil and war-profit­eering, then GeorgeWBus­h is your man to front it, with DickCheney­, the former Secretary of Defense who initiated the privatizin­g of the military a decade earlier, actually running the operation from the shadows.  

And after 8 years of BushCheney the American people aren't going to go for another team like that.  They're going to want HOPE & CHANGE, with a persona they can believe in & trust.  BarackObam­a.   

Obama's 'most ardent admirers' just like the packaging better.  I'm not talking skin color, although that may be a factor for some of them; I'm talking about how a 'D' after the name is a brand they trust believe and trust in, despite the fact that it's the same 'soap' (product).

You continue to support Obama and Democrats at the expense of your own best interests. As long as his numbers remain high, he does the bidding of corporatio­ns and establishm­ent elites.

Why should Obama & Democrats do anything for you if they know they've got you over a barrel, that you're going to vote for them no matter what, because you're terrified of Republican­s?
About Barack Obama 2012
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP