WikiLeaks' Online Presence Imperiled By Attacks

Only Time states that, and we know how reliable Time is about publishing anything the government wants.

Every other report that I've read has said that the women did not accuse him of non-consen­sual s#x.  

While the s3x aspect is t!tillat!n­g, it's meant to be a distractio­n.  It has nothing to do with the documents released on W!kileaks.  He can be a ser!al k!ller for all the relevance it has to the documents.

For those who don't know the facts, no charges have been filed against Assange for anything.  The alleged victims have publicly stated that no r@pe took place.

There are all of these secondary filings of paperwork (like a 'red notice' by Interpol and European Arrest Warrant) that have no force of law on their own without any actual criminal charges being filed against Assange and what you would typically do AFTER someone is charged with a crime in order to arrest and extradite the person back to the country where the alleged crimes occurred.  

These secondary filings really show the authoritie­s in a frenzy, salivating in their anxiety to do something about Assange.  

And from what I understand­, even if Assange were arrested and extradicte­d, or 'disappear­ed', "the show would go on"; Wikileaks would continue to publish these documents.  

So all of this drama around Assange is distractio­n.
About Wikileaks
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost