Oil Spill Continues To Wash Ashore In Gulf, BP Deep-Cleaning Beaches In Response

"So the question is: Is Obama, with the best and the brightest advisors surrounding him, just horribly misinformed?  Or is he a corrupt Iiar?"

Not necessarily disagreeing with your last statement ( the "corrupt" bit is a "bit over the top").
==========­==========­==========­==========­==========­==========­=

I think the facts of what Obama has done while in office (and even before, with his flip-flop on his FISA vote in July 2008, during the presidential campaign) support the charge of corruption (1 a : to become tainted or rotten b : to become morally debased, 2 a: to cause disintegration or ruin).  

You can choose to think of Obama and his intentions in whatever way makes you happy.  What you can't do is explain how any of what Obama's done these past two years has been in the People's and not the Corporations' interests.  Or how, in this catastrophic event in the Gulf, Obama's allowing BP to flood the Gulf of Mexico with millions of gallons of a dispersant (Corexit), a neurotoxin that's so dangerous it is banned in the UK (it causes respiratory, nervous system, liver, kidney and blood disorders -- Let's just say it: It causes de@th in the living organisms it comes in contact with, including human beings) can be considered anything but corrupt.  BP's sole purpose for using dispersant was to hide the amount of oil that was G U S H I N G  from the blowout.  

I think you're in massive denial yourself, to have written what you did, specifically challenging that comment of mine and trying to make 'seeps' acceptable.   What would that mean to you, for your life, if you were to believe that Obama is corrupt?  What would that mean to you personally?
About Gulf Oil Spill
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost