House Candidates To Spend Over $1 Billion On Elections

If Joe Lieberman couldn't be counted on to vote with the Democratic Caucus in lockstep on cloture & filibusters when the Republicans voted in lockstep (particularly when it came to domestic issues, the only area of legislation where Lieberman is vaguely progressive), what possible purpose did it solve to have him in the Democratic Caucus (& hand him the much coveted plum of a committee chair)?



http://www .nytimes.c om/2008/11 /07/us/pol itics/07co ng.html?_r =3&ref=pol itics&oref =slogin&or ef=slogin



http://thi­nkprogress­.org/liebe­rman-not-p­rogressive­/



http://www­.dailykos.­com/story/­2008/11/8/­17349/2244



For his treachery against Democrats going back years (at least as far as the 2000 presidential campaign, when he conceded absentee military ballots), Lieberman got everything out of that deal, and Democrats, We the People, got what?



KEEP READING
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost