Obama 2012 Campaign Helped By MoveOn.org, AFL-CIO Super PAC Alliance
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
The problem was the 40 Republicans and Joe Lieberman============================
JoeLieberman has Obama's back. Unfortunately, you presume Obama's objectives are the Democratic voters' objectives.
If JoeLieberman couldn't be counted on to vote with the DemocraticCaucus in lockstep on cloture & filibusters when the Republicans voted in lockstep (particularly when it came to domestic issues, the only area of legislation where Lieberman's vaguely progressive), what possible purpose did it solve to have him in the DemocraticCaucus (& hand him the much coveted plum of a committee chair)?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/07/us/politics/07cong.html?_r=3&ref=politics&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
http://thinkprogress.org/lieberman-not-progressive/
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/11/8/17349/2244
For his treachery against Democrats going back years (at least as far as the 2000 presidential campaign, when he conceded absentee military ballots), Lieberman got everything out of that deal, and Democrats got what?
Without 60, without his voting on cloture/filibusters, on the legislation that Obama & Democrats had planned to put on the floor in the coming 2-4 years (which has all been what Lieberman would be expected to vote in the same way as the rest of the Democrats), what is Lieberman needed for that you'd bring him into the DemocraticCaucus (make him privvy to your strategizing) and reward him with a plum chairmanship, where he buried investigating the BushCheney administration over their failures during HurricaneKatrina?
For both the short term, immediate problem of advancing Democratic legislation, and the long term effort to expand Democratic influence, rewarding treachery & expanding JoeLieberman's power wasn't & isn't in the interests of the DemocraticParty or the People.
Do you really believe that Obama got nothing for that concession? No agreement that Lieberman would vote as Obama told him to vote? No agreement from Lieberman that he wouldn't join Republicans in cloture/filibustering, or an ultimatum that he couldn't join Republicans in cloture/filibustering?? No agreement that he'd sign on to a PublicOption?
Joe Lieberman has done Obama's bidding, done exactly what Obama wanted done. Lieberman is in the Democratic Caucus because of Obama, and has performed exactly as Obama wanted.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
0 comments:
Post a Comment