Torie Osborn And Betsy Butler Face Off For California Assembly Seat
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Lieberman could never be counted on.
=============================
There is nothing that Democrats in Congress are doing that Obama hasn't signed off on, much less ordered.
When you are the president, you are the head of your political party. When your political party controls both Houses of Congress and the White House, you do what the head of your party tells you to do. The only people who don't understand this are those who have never worked in politics or in government.
Democrats like to hide this from the people, and lend the illusion of democracy (small 'd'), like "herding cats", "no organized party", etc., but that's how it is, and it's the only reason there are political parties.
If you do not get behind what the leader of your political party tells you to do, you're going to find your life really cold and lonely for the duration of your term in office. Come election time, you will NOT have the party organization behind you either at a state or national level, and that is certain death for your time in office, not to mention your overall career in politics.
The Democratic leadership could've taken away committee chairs of members in their caucus that joined with Republicans and threatened to filibuster a public option for healthcare.
The DNC could've taken away reelection funds. But it hasn't. Because Lieberman and Blue Dogs (and Republicans) provide cover to Obama and the DLC-controlled Democratic Party, to let them continue to serve corporate interests over the interests of the People.
Obama insisted Lieberman remain in the Democratic Caucus. In spite of multiple betrayals by Lieberman before and during the 2008 election (Lieberman endorsed McCain, campaigned FOR McCain).
Over Democratic senators objections, Obama insisted Lieberman keep the chairmanship of the GovernmentalAffairsAndHomelandSecurityCommittee. That's the committee that whitewashed the Bush administration's failure during Hurricane Katrina. Obama rubberstamped that committee's not investigating Bush once Democrats took over control of government after the 2008 election.
Does anyone really believe that Obama got nothing for that concession? No agreement that Lieberman would vote as Obama told him to vote? No agreement from Lieberman that he couldn't join Republicans in filibustering? No agreement that he would sign on to a PublicOption?
If Obama got nothing for that concession, why didn't he? Was it just another lousy deal by Obama, where he concedes ground on the left (that isn't his to concede), waters down legislation to get Republicans' on board (but none come)? Was it another giveaway to big business, another selling out of the People?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
0 comments:
Post a Comment