http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/21/lieberman-obama-never-pre_n_399355.htmlThe Democratic leadership could’ve taken away committee chairs of members in their caucus that didn't go along with the program. They didn’t.
The DNC could’ve taken away reelection funds. It didn’t.
HarryReid could’ve actually forced Republican
s and turncoat Democratic senators to filibuster
. He didn’t (and doesn’t).
The Progressiv
e Caucus could have kept their pledge about not voting for a bill that didn’t include a robust public option. They didn’t.
Obama
DID unleash the attack dogs to go after Howard Dean when Dean said it was a lousy bill. Dean was then forced to get back into line. Obama went after Kucinich, the last remaining holdout on the Progressiv
e Caucus, for threatenin
g to vote no on the healthcare bill, and we all know how that ended.
There is nothing that Lieberman (or Nelson or Lincoln) is doing that Obama hasn’t ordered. Obama and the DLC-Democr
ats want Lieberman there, doing what he’s doing, which is to take the heat off of Democrats.
And the proof of this is that when Obama needed Nelson re: Stupak amendment, he ‘bought’ his support. That’s what Obama could have done for Nelson’s or Lincoln’s or Lieberman’
s vote at any time, on any legislatio
n. He sure did it when he needed Mary Landrieu’s vote.
There could be 100 “progressi
ves” in the Senate and 435 in the House, and they and Obama would still find a way to deliver to corporatio
ns instead of the People, and blame it on Republican
s.
Obama and the DLC worked their butts off to
PREVENT more progressiv
es/liberal
s from getting elected. Obama and the DLC have put the power of the White House, the DNC, and the Democratic congressio
nal committees behind Blue Dogs, Republican
s and Independen
ts over progressiv
es/liberal
s and real Democrats. Some, but not all, examples:
Blue Dog Blanche Lincoln over the more progressiv
e Democrat Lt. Governor Bill Halter.
Republican
-turned-In
dependent ArlenSpect
er over more progressiv
e Democrat JoeSestak.
Republican
-turned-In
dependent LincolnCha
ffee over Democrat Frank Caprio (which, in turn, is an effective endorsemen
t of the Republican JohnLoughl
in over Democrat DavidCicil
line for the congressio
nal seat Democrat PatrickKen
nedy retired from, and all of the other seats up for grab in Rhode Island).
Republican
-turned-In
dependent CharlieCri
st over liberal Democrat KendrickMe
ek.
Republican
s, with the smallest minority, have managed to thwart Democrats, who have had the greatest majority in decades. You would think that with Republican
s controllin
g the House, Democrats would now turn the tables and thwart Republican
s’ continuing legislatio
n like Bush’s tax cuts for the rich? Are Democrats just stupld? Or is it just Obama’s ‘most ardent supporters
’?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment