Like I said earlier, Obama didn't need it because he got his healthcare reform bill passed through reconcilia
tion, but he came into office with a
FILIBUSTER-proof Senate. 60 in the Democratic Caucus.
Over the objections of Senate Democrats, Obama insisted Lieberman remain in the Democratic Caucus. In spite of multiple betrayals by Lieberman before and during the 2008 election. Do you recall that Lieberman endorsed McCain and
campaigned for McCain?
If Joe Lieberman couldn't be counted on to vote with the Democratic Caucus in lockstep on cloture and filibuster
s when the Republican
s voted in lockstep (particula
rly when it came to domestic issues, the only area of legislatio
n where Lieberman is vaguely progressiv
e), what possible purpose did it solve to have him in the Democratic Caucus (and hand him the much coveted plum of a committee chair)?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/07/us/politics/07cong.html?_r=3&ref=politics&oref=slogin&oref=sloginhttp://thinkprogress.org/lieberman-not-progressive/http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/11/8/17349/2244KEEP READINGRead the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment