
I never advise people to sit out elections, because if you're not at the table, you're on the menu. It's what angers me about Obama, and one of many reasons I know him to be a con man betraying them that brung 'im. Because by shutting out liberals, the base, from his administra
tion, by taking SinglePaye
r, a PublicOpti
on, off the table, eliminatin
g regulatory oversight from FinanceRef
orm legislatio
n, extending Bush's TaxCuts, he's given pro-corpor
ate, Republican
-like policies an inside line. The People's advocates can't even get in the door of this government
.
Unlike a candidate trying to become president, an incumbent president runs on his record. PresidentO
bama's record is that of a Republican
's --
I don't vote for Republicans, no matter what initial is after their names.
I tell people that they're not limited to voting for just Democrats and Republican
s. There are other alternativ
es besides sitting out the election or voting for Republican
s. There are other candidates running as independen
ts in just about every race.
If for no other reason than to get the 5% necessary for getting a seat at the table, it must be done.Democratic voters better start doing it; with each passing day it becomes impossible to turn it all around.
A 'TeaParty'
-like challenge from the left within the Democratic
Party would've been the obvious next step, but it's a waste of time which would accomplish nothing. To begin with, no one in the Democratic
Party will do it. It would be su!cide for any profession
al politician in the Democratic
Party to run against the party's sitting president (the DLC has gotten too powerful, what with a Democrat in the WhiteHouse and a Democratic
ally-contr
olled Senate overseeing an NSA with today's eavesdropp
ing abilities) .
Unless Obama drops out, the only challenges to him will come from outside the Democratic
Party (Republica
ns or Independen
ts). That said, here are two powerful arguments for challengin
g Obama from the left (either from inside or outside the party):
MichaelLerner's very powerful case for primarying Obama.
RalphNader's very powerful case for primarying Obama (and he's not running again).
MichaelLer
ner's argument is sweetly naive, IMHO, in that he's hopeful that Obama and Democrats can be moved to the left. I don't think that's true. I think the party and the culture of Washington
, what has happened to our government in the last 40 years (both parties have been thoroughly corrupted)
, the only hope for our salvation is going to come from outside the parties -- And it better happen soon because with each passing day it becomes impossible to turn it all around.
Obama's 'most ardent supporters
' need to get on the correct side, the real Democratic side of these issues, or join the Republican
Party (and take the DLC and Obama with them).
About Keith OlbermannRead the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment