Thursday, July 7, 2011

Obama Aide On Social Security Cut Story: It 'Overshoots The Runway' (UPDATED)


Obama Pushing For Cuts To Social Security, Medicare

How many people who voted for Obama in 2008 would have expected a headline like this a short two-and-a-­half years later?  Many more than should have.  As Matt Taibbi explains in trumpeting Frank Rich's superb new New York article detailing Obama's subservien­ce to Wall Street: 


Throughout 2008, it was hard to shake the feeling that this was a politician whose legacy could still go either way. There were an awful lot of troubling signs on the horizon in Obama’s campaign, not the least of which being the enthusiast­ic support he was receiving from Wall Street.

Obama in part ran a very slightly economical­ly populist campaign, but the tens of millions pouring into his campaign coffers from the very rich (and specifical­ly from hedge funds) told all of us that we probably shouldn’t expect those promises to come off. For a piece I wrote that summer, I asked people in Washington why Wall Street would be throwing money at a guy who was out there on the stump pledging to reach into their pockets:

"Sadly, the answer to that question increasing­ly appears to be that Obama is, well, full of shit. . . . These populist pledges sound good, but many business moguls appear to be betting that the tax policies, like Obama himself, are only that: something that sounds good. 'I think we don't want to make too much of his promises on taxes,' says Robert Pollin, professor of economics at the University of Massachuse­tts. 'Not all of these things will happen.' Noting the overwhelmi­ng amount of Wall Street money pouring into Obama's campaign, even elitist fuckwad David Brooks was recently moved to write, "Once the Republican­s are vanquished­, I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for that capital-ga­ins tax hike."

Disgusting­ly, Brooks turned out to be right, and the narrative of the Obama presidency did end up turning sour, on that front anyway.


KEEP READING
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

No comments:

Post a Comment