Equating Obama with Bush/Cheney? This is a loser's rant. And with SCOTUS having spoken (badly) in the Citizens United case, the only way to take "personhood" away from corporations will be to form a supermajority to push back on the GOP. Splintering the Democratic party with divisive anti-Obama rhetoric offers only failure and disappointment-- more to whine about.
==========
==========
==========
======
If Republican
s are such scvm (and I believe they are) and "so dangerous"
, why isn't Obama investigat
ing and prosecutin
g them?
Why isn't Obama investigat
ing and prosecutin
g the greatest heist on the People in all history?
Why are Obama-Demo
crats continuing the war crimes of BushCheney
, blocking investigat
ions and prosecutio
ns into their crimes?
How does a Democratic president, on the heels of the most criminally corrupt administra
tion in the nation's history, not replace Bush-era US attorneys? Presidents may fire US attorneys, and they do so routinely at the beginning of a new administra
tion. It is unusual to fire US attorneys in mid-term (as Bush did) except in cases of gross misconduct (which wasn’t the case during the BushAdmini
stration). Instead of returning the democracy to the American people, Obama's AttorneyGe
neral has US attorneys going after legalized medicinal marijuana in the states and Bush-style obscenity prosecutio
ns:
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_691667.htmlObama's continuing just about all of the BushCheney policies, even going BushCo one better:
How do any of Obama's 'most ardent supporters' explain Obama's doctrine that presidents have the right to k!ll American citizens with no due process, no oversight, and his push for 'indefinite preventive detention' and no transparency of anything a president asserts should be his secret? Pure Kafka.As a Democrat, I don't know how any Democrat can get behind this. How do Obama's 'most ardent supporters
' explain all that to themselves
?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
0 comments:
Post a Comment