Regarding "everything on the table," it just sounds like he wants to come across as the reasonable person, in stark contrast to those who take pledges to oppose him and see him fail no matter what. I don't have a major problem with that.
==========
==========
==========
==========
====
Then what? He caves. He goes to the side of those "who take pledges to oppose him and see him fail no matter what." He sells out them that brung 'im.
Now you may think that's reasonable
, that he gave it some thought and was convinced of the other side's argument (and obviously that must be alright with you, that you must not have a horse in that race so it doesn't matter or that you're willing to live with whatever loss he has accepted on your behalf), but that says more about you, and what I call "mushy minded independen
ts" (that middle-of-
the-road voter, the 3-5 percent of voters who make up their minds as to who they're voting for based on who got to them right before they entered the voting booth).
But to those of us who have studied the issues, who LIVE the issues, who have experience
d Democratic politician
s conceding away hard fought for and won positions these past 30 years, it's not alright and you're the problem.
The "Obama is reasonable
"-argument doesn't cut it anymore. Obama has done everything @$$-backwa
rds. What he does only makes sense if he's NOT a populist, NOT a liberal (we knew that he wasn't, but Obama's most ardent supporters implored people to believe that "once he gets into the Oval Office, you'll see!"), and IS a continuati
on of the same failed policies of the transnatio
nal corporatio
ns that have destroyed the middle class.
The only way that what Obama's been doing since getting into the White House 2 1/2 years ago makes sense is if what he wants is NOT what Obama's 'most ardent followers' claim that they want.
About Barack ObamaRead the Article at HuffingtonPost
0 comments:
Post a Comment