
And isn't it interestin
g how the reverse isn't true?
How, when Democrats lose elections, when it's Republican
s in power, when it's a Bush administra
tion, Democratic ideology and policies never get discussed and the narrative then becomes "Elections have consequenc
es" and "President
s are entitled to their nominees".
The media is a willing accomplice
, and helps to rig this situation where the People are always going to lose.
The media refuses to do investigat
ions and vetting of candidates on its own. The media covers politics and government as sporting events, like Howard Cosell calling a boxing match. The media's preferred role is to only cover the conflict. So why isn't the media covering the conflict within the Democratic Party? Why is it "the Tea Party vs. the Republican
s in Congress against Obama and the Democratic Party" and not also, "Obama and the DLC-contro
lled Democrats in Congress versus the base of the Democratic Party"?
About Rahm EmanuelRead the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment