Dems Struggle To Build 'Firewall' Against House Losses

The real point here is that if you didn't like the Republican Party of the last 35 years, the party of Reagan (forget just the past 8), you're going to h8 where Obama and the DLC are taking the 'new & improved' Democratic Party from which they hope "to govern for 100 years".



That's why all of the incumbents have to go, including Obama.



Haven't you asked yourself how Obama could go after the base of the Democratic Party, Sarah Palin & Rush Limbaugh (2 people with absolutely no role whatsoever in the Republican Party), and he won't go after Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld, Feith, Wolfowitz, Yoo, Bybee, et al, or anyone in the Republican leadership or in Congress.



Why hasn't Obama (nor any of the DemocraticParty leadership) held the BushAdministration to account? Why hasn't Obama (nor any of the Democratic Party leadership) gone after anyone for the economic meltdown?



Perhaps it would be kind of hard to swallow (Obama going after an administration for having committed crimes) when it's the same activities that Obama's actively engaged in. It's also counter-intuitive to your other agenda, the DLC's agenda for the past 20 years, which is to attract Republican politicians & their supporters into the DemocraticParty, which can only be done by moving the DemocraticParty to the right of right-of-center.
About 2010 Elections
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost