Congratulations, Polanski-Defenders -- Now the Child-Rapist Walks Free!
Thursday, July 15, 2010
I did not accuse you of defending him, I asked if you were.
==========
This is exactly what you said:
=="You are aware that the ONLY reason the prosecutors plea bargained was because this child's mother requested it, right? Are you actually defending him? He drugged and raped a child."==
Let's have a show of hands, please: How many think lisaman was accusing Marcospinelli of defending Polanski?
The irony in lisaman's circuitous logic might be amusing if it wasn't shared by so many posting to these threads. Like-minded lynchmen & women, the uneducated & muddy-minded who agree with lisaman's accusation, that stating the fact that Polanski was not convicted of the "drugging and anal rape of a 13 year old" is defending Polanski (which is apparently outrageous to lisaman because "he drugged and raped a child").
About Roman Polanski
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
0 comments:
Post a Comment