A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

James Clapper: I Gave 'Least Untruthful' Answer Possible On NSA Surveillance (VIDEO)

Wednesday, June 12, 2013


No, I'm not giving Congress the benefit of anything, but It's actually understandable that members of Congress aren't diligent in their oversight of executive branch overreach because they're being manipulated presidential administrations. Whatever those who did know were told, it was presented in a way to assure them that it was all within the law and necessary to prevent terrorism.   Their STAFFs weren't allowed to see the information, and without being able to discuss it with experts, they'd have no idea of what they're dealing with. 

Do you remember how when the news of waterboarding and torture because public, everyone, especially Nancy Pelosi, went into defensive mode. She insisted that she wasn't informed, and Porter Goss said she had been informed. This is reminiscent of that time, and it conflates with how Bush and Cheney managed to get Congress to vote for the AUMF (Authority to Use Military Force) against Iraq. 

Former Democratic representative Pete Kanjorski told about a meeting he and other members of Congress were summoned to at the White House, with Bush and Condoleeza Rice floating in and out of. CIA was making the presentation, and it was later that he (and we) all learned that it was FABRICATED evidence - Photographs CIA was purporting to have been taken over Iraq, of Iraq's ability to get intercontinental missiles to the U.S. In actuality, the photographs were created in the U.S. southwest. 

We also learned from that account how Bush-Cheney managed to manage Congress, congressional approval, for criminal acts like torture and water boarding, and then saying "Congress knew all about it and approved" by breaking up 'notice' into component parts, like the budget for such an operation. It would then introduce it through a subcommittee which typically the congress's staff attends, but not necessarily the members themselves. As the staff has no security clearance for knowing about torture or waterboarding, the actual category for the expense is never divulged, but instead some generic label is given to the expense which nobody ever knows the real purpose. 

In both of these instances, the path for the deception went straight through John Murtha, Democratic representative from Pennsylvania, chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, one of the top most corrupt in Congress, a big 'defense appropriations'-earmark guy.

Working the backdoors of Congress was Dick Cheney's and David Addington's real "gift" to the Bush administration - The inner workings of Congress from Cheney's time in the House, and how to get around that pesky body.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

PRISM Program: Obama Administration Held 22 Briefings For Congress On Key FISA Law

Monday, June 10, 2013


This administration, like the one before it, has gone to great lengths to keep the program, and the extent of the spying on Americans, a secret not just to Americans, but to Congress.

I guarantee you that many, if not most members of Congress never knew about PRISM, nor did they know the breadth of the NSA's, et al's, reach into our private lives.  PRISM isn't listed in the FISA legislation.  What they're talking about "briefing" is section 702, and only in the most general terms.  

I can tell you that from what they've said and what we know of how these intelligence agencies have been "briefing" members over the years.  "Soft peddle" is a kind word for how they misinform members of Congress.  A more accurate description is that they set out to dupe members of Congress.  We even can see DNI director James Clapper LYING, point blank, to a direct question by a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee's question on this subject.  It's breath-taking how these people are operating.  Read these -

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/Marcospinelli/edward-snowden-nsa-leak-guardian-whistleblower-nsa-revelations_n_3412245_259897780.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/Marcospinelli/prism-program-obama_n_3416973_260112012.html
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

PRISM Program: Obama Administration Held 22 Briefings For Congress On Key FISA Law


By Fox News.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

PRISM Program: Obama Administration Held 22 Briefings For Congress On Key FISA Law


Actually, the core of the Patriot Act was written by Joe Biden in 1995 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnibus_Counterterrorism_Act_of_1995
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Edward Snowden, NSA Whistleblower, Says He Acted Out Of Conscience To Protect 'Basic Liberties'


If you have nothing to hide, then you wouldn't mind giving me the passwords to your email accounts, and your social security number, your credit card numbers and bills since when you first had credit cards.  And you'll have no problem with me posting it all online, right?

Do you have curtains on your windows?  

Do you close the door when you go to the bathroom?

Do you have s3x on public streets?  

If you have nothing to hide, then you have no life.

It's not about having anything to hide; it's about things not being anyone else's business.  People don't need to justify their desire for privacy.  We have a birthright to this privacy - It's called the Constitution.  You and the government need to justify your interest in my privacy - Come back with a warrant.  

Currently there are over 1 MILLION people with the same or better security clearances as Edward Snowden, who can gain access to our private records.  Everything from our medical histories and television viewing habits, our book purchases, etc., in the hands of people who are PEOPLE.  Disgruntled exes, employees-going-postal, all kind of people suffering from "the human condition" with information that many don't even want their families and friends knowing.  They're not even in government - This is all private contracting work.  

Your head-in-the-sand attitude that goes with "I've got nothing to hide" shows your lack of any good judgment - You are trusting in an executive that has declared that the government can rendition you, keep you imprisoned indefinitely, and kill you, on a hunch.  No oversight, no due process, nothing.  How stvpid are you?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Edward Snowden, NSA Whistleblower, Says He Acted Out Of Conscience To Protect 'Basic Liberties'


If you have nothing to hide, then you have no life.

Do you have curtains on your windows?  

Do you close the door when you go to the bathroom?

Do you have s3x on public streets?  

If you have nothing to hide, then you wouldn't mind giving me the passwords to your email accounts, and your social security number, your credit card numbers and bills since you've had credit cards, and you'll have no problem with me posting it all online.  

I don't have anything to hide, but I don't have anything that I feel like showing you, either.  It's not about having anything to hide; it's about things not being anyone else's business.  People don't need to justify their desire for privacy.  You and the government need to justify yours - Come back with a warrant.  

The head-in-the-sand attitude that goes with "I've got nothing to hide" shows your lack of any good judgment - You are trusting in an executive that has declared that the government can rendition you, keep you imprisoned indefinitely, and kill you, on a hunch.  No oversight, no due process, nothing.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Eric Cantor 'Perplexed' By NSA Surveillance Revelations


Member of the intelligence committees, people who have been cleared to see top secret documents, have been LIED to and stonewalled.   

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/Marcospinelli/eric-cantor-nsa_n_3414635_260054706.html

Whatever those who did know were told, their STAFFs weren't allowed to see the information, and without being able to discuss it with experts, they'd have no idea of what they're dealing with.  

This is reminiscent of how Bush and Cheney managed to get Congress to vote for the AUMF (Authority to Use Military Force) against Iraq.  Former Democratic representative Pete Kanjorski told about a meeting he and other members of Congress were summoned to at the White House, with Bush and Condoleeza Rice floating in and out of.  CIA was making the presentation, and it was later that he (and we) all learned that it was FABRICATED evidence - Photographs CIA was purporting to have been taken over Iraq, of Iraq's ability to get intercontinental missiles to the U.S.  In actuality, the photographs were created in the U.S. southwest.  

We also learned how Bush-Cheney managed to manage Congress, congressional approval, for criminal acts like torture and water boarding, and then saying "Congress knew all about it and approved" by breaking up 'notice' into component parts, like the budget for such an operation.  It would then introduce it through a subcommittee which typically the congress's staff attends, but not necessarily the members themselves.  As the staff has no security clearance for knowing about torture or waterboarding, the actual category for the expense is never divulged, but instead some generic label is given to the expense which nobody ever knows the real purpose.  

That was Dick Cheney's and David Addington's "gift" to the Bush administration - The inner workings of Congress from Cheney's time in the House, and how to get around that pesky body.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP