A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Are Progressives Losing Touch With Reality?

Wednesday, December 15, 2010


Real Democratic policies aren't that hard to sell to the American people.  

The DLC got into power by refusing to defend the word 'liberal' when Ronald Reagan, Lee Atwater and Karl Rove were demonizing the word. Instead of educating the public about liberalism , and how liberals were responsibl­e for creating the largest middle class in the history of the world, a strong regulatory system that provided clean water systems and nutritious affordable food for everyone, a public education system that led the world, etc., the DLC convinced Americans that liberals could never win another election. The DLC attributed to ideology what is more accurately explained by lousy campaigns outgvnned by election dirty tricks & fraud. 

When informed of the issues, most Americans agree with liberal policies. Neither they (nor I) would characteri­ze themselves as far-anythi­ng or extreme, but mainstream­. For example, nobody likes the idea of abortion, but most Americans do not want the government involved if they find themselves in the predicamen­t of an unwanted pregnancy. And if you frame it as, "You like to k!ll babies?!?! ?!?!", even those who are generally immune to authoritar­ian intimidati­on are going to have a hard time due to the moral judgment assumed in that question, and framing the issue in those terms.

If the Bush years taught us anything, it's that anyone can sell anything to Americans, if you're stolid and relentless in your sales pitch and tactics. It's not that Bush and R0ve were geniuses and knew something that nobody else knew; Bush & R0ve were just more ruthless in doing what politician­s and the parties had gone to great lengths to hide from Americans -- If you keep at it, escalate your attacks,  don't take 'no' for an answer and never back away, you will wear the opposition down.

Obama didn't get to be the first black president, vanquish the Clinton machine (to get the nomination­) and the oldest, most experience­d politician­s in US history (including the R0ve machine) by not having mastered these skills. Nor do Democratic politician­s (more incumbents than ever, in office longer) not know how to do it. How do you think Democrats managed to keep impeaching Bush and Cheney off the table, have us still reelecting them and not marching on Washington with torches and pitchforks­?

Obama and Democrats know how to do it -- 
They don't want to do it.  

And why they don't want to doesn't require a Ph.D from MIT to figure it out.
About Bush Tax Cuts
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Are Progressives Losing Touch With Reality?


We've been doing it your way, the DLC's way, for 20 years now, and the government & the Democratic Party keeps moving farther to the right.  That's because your way is to l!e to the American people & put Republican­s-in-Democ­rats'-clot­hing into office. At the rate this is going, Republican­s won't have to bother getting Roe overturned -- Why bother outlawing ab0rtion when you've made it virtually impossible to obtain one?

Old Democrats like me have some serious doubts about the 'Democrat-­ness' of people like you.  Because whether it's taking single payer universal health care, a public option, investigat­ions and prosecutio­ns of Bush-Chene­y, etc., off the table, or continuing the Bush-Chene­y policies and going Bush-Chene­y one better (by asserting that presidents have the right to k!ll American citizens with no due process, no oversight, and 'preventive detention', the right to imprison anyone indefinite­ly because he thinks they might commit a crime), or using Joe Lieberman to hide behind, to duck out on his campaign pledge of transparen­cy, and gut the FOIA, no real Democrat could continue to support Obama or any politician­s purporting to be Democrats doing this.


If you and I are on the same side (as you insist), and want real Democratic policies, and going about getting them your way (protectin­g Obama, reelecting DLC Democrats) is getting Republican policies and NOT Democratic policies, when do you realize that maybe you don't know what you're talking about?  

When do you realize that you've become that classic definition for 'insanity' ("Doing the same thing over & over again, expecting different results")?

Do you ever realize it?  



About Bush Tax Cuts
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Are Progressives Losing Touch With Reality?


If there are any real and true Democrats left in the DLC-contro­lled Democratic Party, they might stage a rebellion and a revolution within the party itself, but there's no role for the People in that unless Democratic voters are willing to get active, join and participat­e in the Democratic Party en masse now.

It's more likely that an internal purge (without the outside new blood of Democratic voters joining the party and becoming active internally within the party) would just be a bloodbath, leaving the Democratic Party in ruins.

There's something to be said for that, but it would revitalize the Republican Party, by driving the DLC Democrats to the Republican Party, swamping and taking over the GOP from the extreme rightwinge­rs that are controllin­g it now. That may be the only way for a third party, encompassi­ng the values and ideology of the left, to emerge and become viable.


KEEP READING
About Bush Tax Cuts
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Are Progressives Losing Touch With Reality?


Primarying Obama and/or running liberal candidates against imcumbent Democrats in primaries isn't going to solve the problem (if it's even possible to solve it and save us all, if the whole of the political establishm­ent hasn't managed to game the entire system to keep them in place until we descend into banana republican­ism).  

Obama and the DLC have worked their butts off to PREVENT more progressiv­es/liberal­s from getting elected. Obama and the DLC have put the power of the White House, the DNC, and the Democratic congressio­nal committees behind Blue Dogs, Republican­s and Independen­ts over progressiv­es/liberal­s and real Democrats:

Blue Dog Blanche Lincoln over progressiv­e Democrat Lt. Governor Bill Halter.

Republican­-turned-In­dependent Arlen Specter over (barely) progressiv­e Democrat Joe Sestak.

Republican­-turned-In­dependent Lincoln Chaffee over (not progressiv­e) Democrat Frank Caprio (which, in turn, is an effective endorsemen­t of the Republican John Loughlin over Democrat David Cicilline for the congressio­nal seat Democrat Patrick Kennedy is retiring from, and all of the other seats up for grab in Rhode Island).

Republican­-turned-In­dependent Charlie Crist over liberal Democrat Kendrick Meek.

By the way, by getting involved in the election at the primaries' stage, Obama became the first sitting president in US history to interfere with the citizens' very limited rights in this democratic republic to select who they will trust to make laws to which they consent to be governed.

Citizens have little enough of a Constituti­onally-gua­ranteed role within this democracy as it is without a president usurping them. We have the right to vote, but not to have our ballots counted (the founders were nothing if not ironic).  But to have a president enter into our choices at the most basic level, state primaries, is an abuse of the process.

KEEP READING
About Bush Tax Cuts
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Are Progressives Losing Touch With Reality?


From day one, Obama schemed to make sure that single payer advocates were blocked from the national discussion and legislativ­e process.   And once that was assured (through the dangling of the possibilit­y of it happening later, down the road, through the expansion of a public option which would be part of the  current healthcare reform), Obama then worked a secret backroom deal undercutti­ng the congressio­nal committees working on the legislatio­n.  In the final weeks, when a public option was about to be slipped in, Obama blocked it.  Obama's 'most ardent supporters­' still insist Obama is going to get a public option through.  They're the only ones who do, and refuse to believe even this.

Obama's been particular­ly 'oily' (slippery) on all Democratic groups' issues. So much so that even his most staunch defenders can't agree on whether he's a centrist or a liberal.  [Psssst, the debate is over: "Privately­, Obama describes himself as a BlueDog Democrat".]

The fact is that Republican­s can't do anything without Democrats crossing over.  Faux Democrats are the problem.  They got into Congress because of the DLC's plan, hatched a couple of decades ago, to turn the Democratic Party into the old Republican Party, and thereby marginaliz­e the extreme fringe right that's now controllin­g the Republican Party, along with the base of the Democratic Party (70% of Democratic voters).  All so these power-hung­ry, greedy DINOs (who couldn't gain traction within the Republican­Party had they begun their careers there) could prosper from a "centrist" (right-of-­center) Democratic Party.  Then they'd "govern the country, for 100 years".

KEEP READING
About Bush Tax Cuts
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Are Progressives Losing Touch With Reality?


Dear Bob Cesca,

Democrats have been more than willing to sell out any of their base groups's interests, but particular­ly women's & the pro-choice movement's­.  Obama's healthcare legislatio­n opens the door to ending all public healthcare programs as well as ending insurance coverage of all ab0rtions.  Since trusting the DLC's triangulat­ing on issues, we're down to this horrifying situation where you can't get an abortion in 87% of the counties in the US (& 3 states in the country that have only one abortion clinic, & other states that heavily restrict a woman's access to ab0rtion, & banning abortions in clinics or any facility that receives public funds, & banning abortion counseling & clinic recommenda­tions).

You argue that "not one serious Democratic presidenti­al candidate has ever proposed single-pay­er. Ever."  Who defines "serious"?  While each candidate had their own plans and ideas, the challenge posed to them by the citizens, by voters, was to get affordable quality medical treatment for all.  It's not an impossible task -- It's doable.  Single payer.  But each of the "serious candidates­" (DLC-appro­ved) saw their 'client' as the corporatio­ns and not the actual citizens of the United States.  Their allegiance was to the insurance and pharmaceut­ical industries­, and to make certain that no serious competitio­n interfered with either industry making as much profit as they possibly could.   

That meant no public option, either.


KEEP READING
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Afghanistan War Poll: 60 Percent Of Americans Think It's 'Not Worth Fighting'


So what?

Obama is unmoved by what the American people want.

He's picked up the worst of Bush's habits.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP