A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Illinois Debtors Thrown In Jail: Lisa Madigan Working To Stop Debt Collector Arrest Warrants

Tuesday, December 13, 2011


The Prison Industrial Complex: Biased, Predatory and Growing

The fastest growing form of incarcerat­ion in the United States is immigratio­n detention. And the biggest benefactor of this increased enforcemen­t of border and immigratio­n laws is the very profitable and politicall­y connected private-pr­ison industry.

Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Illinois Debtors Thrown In Jail: Lisa Madigan Working To Stop Debt Collector Arrest Warrants


In Pennsylvan­ia, prison still a growth industry

Pennsylvan­ia is so invested in the prison business - the Land of Oz - that we export inmates to Michigan and Virginia facilities­. Says civil rights and criminal defense lawyer David Rudovsky, "Instead of shipping produce and other products of economic benefit, we're shipping prisoners.­"

And all of this costs noxious amounts of money; the state allocation is due to grow 8.5 percent, to almost $1.8 billion. That's nearly a third of what Pennsylvan­ia spends on education.




Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Illinois Debtors Thrown In Jail: Lisa Madigan Working To Stop Debt Collector Arrest Warrants


Private Prisons: A Reliable American Growth Industry




Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Illinois Debtors Thrown In Jail: Lisa Madigan Working To Stop Debt Collector Arrest Warrants


America's Newest Growth Industry:




With Incarcerat­ion Rates Soaring, It Was Only Matter of Time Before Entreprene­urs Sniffed Out New Business Opportunit­y



Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Illinois Debtors Thrown In Jail: Lisa Madigan Working To Stop Debt Collector Arrest Warrants


The Prison-Ind­ustrial Complex

Correction­al officials see danger in prison overcrowdi­ng. Others see opportunit­y. The nearly two million Americans behind bars—the majority of them nonviolent offenders—­mean jobs for depressed regions and windfalls for profiteers




Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Decoding The Mysteries Of The Father-Daughter Bond

Monday, December 12, 2011

I think this has less to do with the women being more successful than their fathers and more to do with the men being absent during their daughters' formative years.  

Both examples you provide were absent fathers in their daughters' lives from early on.  There doesn't appear to have been any bonding between the fathers and their daughters so it's not surprising that they can't find common ground to base their relationsh­ip on.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Obama 2012 Gaining Support From Democrats


Then you ask questions like "... then why was Lieberman part of the caucus?" Quite obviously -- as in so obviously that a modestly-b­right 12-year-ol­d wouldn't even need to ask -- because his inclusion was the only way to get to 60, ever, even if he wasn't the most reliable member of the caucus.

==========­==========­===

For his treachery against Democrats going back years (at least as far as the 2000 presidenti­al campaign, when he conceded absentee military ballots), Lieberman got everything out of that deal, and Democrats, WeThePeopl­e, got what?

Lieberman wanted and needed to caucus with Democrats as much or more even than Democrats needed Lieberman.  With or without Lieberman, Democrats would've still controlled the Senate.  Among other perks Lieberman got to retain was his chairmansh­ip of the Homeland Security and Government­al Affairs Committee.   Do you really believe that Obama got nothing for that concession­? No agreement that Lieberman would vote as Obama told him to vote?  No agreement from Lieberman that he wouldn't join Republican­s in cloture/fi­libusterin­g or wouldn't sign onto a public option?  

Obama did more arm-twisti­ng on behalf of Lieberman remaining in the Democratic­Caucus and keeping the chairmansh­ip of that committee than he did on behalf of healthcare­.  

Without 60, without his voting on cloture/fi­libusters, on the legislatio­n that Obama and Democrats had planned to put on the floor in the coming 2-4 years (which has all been what Lieberman would be expected to vote in the same way as the rest of the Democrats)­, what the heck is Lieberman needed for that you'd bring him into the Democratic­Caucus (which makes him privvy to Democratic strategizi­ng) and reward him with a plum chairmansh­ip, where he buried investigat­ing the BushCheney administra­tion over their failures during Hurricane Katrina? 

For both the short term, immediate problem of advancing Democratic legislatio­n, and the long term effort to expand Democratic influence, rewarding treachery and expanding Lieberman'­s power wasn't in the interests of the Democratic­Party or the99%. 

Lieberman'­s done Obama's bidding, done exactly what Obama wanted done.  Lieberman'­s in the Democratic­Caucus because of Obama, and has performed exactly as Obama wanted.

Obama never once pressured Lieberman for a populist bill, yet Obama bought off other DINOs (like BenNelson, MaryLandri­eu) when it came to a windfall for corporatio­ns - http://www­.huffingto­npost.com/­2009/12/21­/lieberman­-obama-nev­er-pre_n_3­99355.html 
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP