Well you know we're never going to get anything different until elections are funded by the government with no outside money at all. All politicians are corporate tools to pay for their campaigns.
==========
==========
==========
==========
=====
Unless and until there is drastic and uncompromi
sing change to our campaign financing system, until corporatio
ns are no longer 'persons' and prohibited from participat
ing in elections and politics, all efforts to reform government are useless. But neither party's interested in doing that because it would mean they would lose their hold on money and power.
Any party that doesn't have that as their first order of business (particula
rly after the Citizens United decision and the overwhelmi
ng public support for reform) is d!rty, r0tten and corrupt to the bone.
I'm an old, lifelong Democrat saying that. I've never voted Republican
, and I can't see voting for another Democrat again. But I think it's too late for that, for this "noble experiment
" continuing the US as we've known it and as it was intended (a democratic republic) by the framers. What's at the root of the problem could only have been remedied had Obama come into office investigat
ing and prosecutin
g the Bush administra
tion and restoring the 'rule of law'.
Bush and Cheney exploited the inherent weaknesses in the Constituti
on: The precarious balance of power between the three branches of government
.
As president, you've got to really want the US to work, to exist, to not exploit the loopholes in the Constituti
on that keep our three-bran
ches of government precarious
ly balancing the democracy. But Bush-Chene
y drove tanks through the loopholes, breaking the law and with no apparent concern for exposing the loopholes or any consequenc
es.
That fact alone casts suspicion on Obama's good intentions after his failure to investigat
e and prosecute and his continuing Bush's 'unitary executive' practices (and expanding them, with "indefinit
e preventive detention" of American citizens and the k!IIing of Americans with no due process or oversight)
.
There was a coup d'etat in this nation, a bloodless one, but a coup nonetheles
s. And both parties are in on it.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Read more...
