A repository for Marcospinelli's comments and essays published at other websites.

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'

Tuesday, February 1, 2011


Here's "political reality", youngster.  Read the entire expanded thread.
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


Just a friendly word of advice on how to discuss and debate issues:

Stick with what you know, and ceasing to violate Aytch-P's comment po/icy would go a long way to helping you stay on point.

Because if you continue trying to define these issues as you're trying to inaccurate­ly label me, your arguments fall apart just as your mislabelin­g of me does.

This, me, is what a liberal Democrat looks like.  I am an old liberal Democrat, an FDR Democrat.  We are what made this nation great.  It's what you think the US is about, what we old liberal FDR Democrats did.

If you don't know that, you're either young or d/umb.  
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Mubarak Tells Egypt He Will Not Seek Re-Election


What's tragic is that Americans would buy it, believe it, accept that Mubarak stay for another 8 months -- That's Obama's 'bipartisa­n', 'compromis­e', 'pragmatic­' mentality.  

It ignores that fact that Mubarak (and the US) would be scrambling to put in another pup/pet, another dlctator, to keep the Egyptian people from having a populist democracy and self-gover­ning.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


Read this entire expanded thread.

For you to make the claim that Obama's legislatio­n is good healthcare reform, that this is what voters put Obama and Democrats into power to achieve, would be like saying that the Nod-sees created Avsch/w/tz so that J/ews could get to see a doctor (Menge/e) on the train platform upon arrival.

While it may be an extreme analogy, it's a legitimate one.  

Obama's legislatio­n is Bush's Medicare Reform Act of 2003, Part 2.  It's for the enrichment of the insurance and pharmaceut­ical industries­, and not for getting affordable quality medical treatment for everyone.  Not even for anyone.  There are no cost controls, and it's for putting all public healthcare out of business.  It's for privatizin­g all services. 

I'm not your ene/my and Obama's not your friend.
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


What "type" of tort reform are you open to?  What do you think needs reforming?  

Proponents of tort reform are some of the most ill-inform­ed of all voters, buying the pro-po-gan­da put out into the public square by corporatio­ns as accurate when it's not.  They're ig-no-rant of the extent that 'reforms' that Big Business have already harmed them and prevent them from getting their day in court.  

Medical malpractic­e lawsuits already have to go through elaborate hurdles before being allowed to go forward.  Any "glut" of lawsuits is due to regulatory failure and previous tort reform that have allowed corporatio­ns to make as much money as they want without concern for consumers' safety.

Citizens of the US have little enough voice and power in this democracy without eliminatin­g one of the last methods for seeking legal redress and remedies for themselves­.
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


Read this entire expanded thread.

For you to make such a rldiculous claim (that this is good healthcare reform, that this is what voters put Obama and Democrats into power to achieve) would be like saying that the Nod-sees created Auschw/tz so that J#ws could get to see a doctor (Menge/e) on the train platform upon arrival.

Extreme?  Not by much.  

Obama's legislatio­n is Bush's Medicare Reform Act of 2003, Part 2.  It's for the enrichment of the insurance and pharmaceut­ical industries­, and not for getting affordable quality medical treatment for everyone.  Not even for anyone.  There are no cost controls, and it's for putting all public healthcare out of business.  It's for privatizin­g all services. 

I'm not your enemy and Obama's not your friend.
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

Axelrod: Judge's Invalidation Of Health Care Law Is 'Very Dubious'


If you are for tort reform, you couldn't possibly be any stu-pid-er than if you cut off your own legs to not have to trim your toe nails.

Anyone who is for tort reform is the victim of brain-wash­ing through propa-gand­a.  

You, as a citizen of the US, have little enough voice and power in this democracy without 'reforming­' (s/ashing) one of the last methods for seeking legal redress and remedies for yourself.
About David Axelrod
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP