The most BS argument to date: "The cuts and the pain must be shared by all".
Why did Obama and Democrats even acquiesce to $31 billion in cuts to programs and services for the poor and middle classes?
It presumes that the poor and the middle classes haven't born the brunt of what Republican s and Democrats of the past 30 years have done.
It presumes that the pain of losing a few million dollars when you have hundreds of millions, even billions, is equivalent to the pain of not knowing where your next meal is coming from, or losing the roof over your head and sleeping in your car or on the street.
When the dust of all of this settles, Obama and Democrats have set the precedent and lowered the bar for who shall be left, yet again, holding the bag for the greatest heist in the history of the world: The people who can least afford it.
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Lame duck DEMOCRATIC Congress, December 15 & 23, 2010.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-6523
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2010/roll650.xml
http://www.gop.gov/bill/111/2/hr6523senateamendment
Obama signed it into law. He could've vetoed it. He could've taken to the buIIy puIpit, he could've done what he did in 2008 to get more people in the history of the nation to vote for him, a black man in good old raclst America where they said it couldn't be done, than ever voted for any candidate.
He could've pulled another 'Kucinich' (see here) on any Democratic member of Congress who didn't support what was one of a long list of broken campaign promises to the base of the Democratic Party (70% of Democratic voters).
He could've pulled 'a Nelson', aka 'a Landrieu' (buying their votes, throwing in some sweetener specific to their state which makes the pain of going against their 'values' easier to take); he, HarryReid, NancyPelosi, all have done it before when it's something that Democrats really want.
But he didn't.
There is nothing that Democrats in Congress are doing that Obama hasn't signed off on, much less ordered.
When you are the president, you are the head of your political party. When your political party controls both Houses of Congress and the WhiteHouse, you do what the head of your party tells you to do. The only people who don't understand this are those who've never worked in politics.
Democrats like to hide this from the people, and lend the illusion of democracy (small 'd'), like "herding cats", "no organized party", etc., but that's how it is, and it's the only reason there are political parties. If you don't get behind what the leader of your political party tells you to do, you're going to find your life really cold and lonely for the duration of your term in office. Come election time, you won't have the party behind you, and that is certain deth for your time in office.
Do you know what and who the DLC/TheThird Way/NoLabels is?
You defend Obama at the expense of your own best interests. As long as his numbers remain high, he does the bidding of corporations and establishment elites.
Why should Obama and Democrats do anything for you if they know they've got you over a barrel, that you're going to vote for them no matter what, because you're terrified of Republicans?
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-6523
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2010/roll650.xml
http://www.gop.gov/bill/111/2/hr6523senateamendment
Obama signed it into law. He could've vetoed it. He could've taken to the buIIy puIpit, he could've done what he did in 2008 to get more people in the history of the nation to vote for him, a black man in good old raclst America where they said it couldn't be done, than ever voted for any candidate.
He could've pulled another 'Kucinich' (see here) on any Democratic member of Congress who didn't support what was one of a long list of broken campaign promises to the base of the Democratic Party (70% of Democratic voters).
He could've pulled 'a Nelson', aka 'a Landrieu' (buying their votes, throwing in some sweetener specific to their state which makes the pain of going against their 'values' easier to take); he, HarryReid, NancyPelosi, all have done it before when it's something that Democrats really want.
But he didn't.
There is nothing that Democrats in Congress are doing that Obama hasn't signed off on, much less ordered.
When you are the president, you are the head of your political party. When your political party controls both Houses of Congress and the WhiteHouse, you do what the head of your party tells you to do. The only people who don't understand this are those who've never worked in politics.
Democrats like to hide this from the people, and lend the illusion of democracy (small 'd'), like "herding cats", "no organized party", etc., but that's how it is, and it's the only reason there are political parties. If you don't get behind what the leader of your political party tells you to do, you're going to find your life really cold and lonely for the duration of your term in office. Come election time, you won't have the party behind you, and that is certain deth for your time in office.
Do you know what and who the DLC/TheThird Way/NoLabels is?
You defend Obama at the expense of your own best interests. As long as his numbers remain high, he does the bidding of corporations and establishment elites.
Why should Obama and Democrats do anything for you if they know they've got you over a barrel, that you're going to vote for them no matter what, because you're terrified of Republicans?
Barack Obama To Run Moneyed 2012 Campaign
By the way, SinglePaye
Had Republican
A weak PublicOpti
The latest Democratic caving is over the budget.
When the budget process began, Republican congressma
So now they're at $64 billion and Democrats have moved all the way over to where PaulRyan was when the process began. So even if Democrats get that number (which in Washington would be considered a "win" for Democrats)
Nothing is going to change until and unless Obama and Democratic politician
About Barack Obama 2012
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Barack Obama To Run Moneyed 2012 Campaign
To those who spew rhetoric like, "Look at how impatient they are. What did they think, he was going to come in and fundamenta
The reason people are disappoint
Everything that Obama does is intended to entrench the system rather than subvert and undermine it. So if he were actually fighting, everyone would have all the patience in the world and say,"We're behind you...It's going to take a long time...(We know that) you can't unentrench powerful interests quickly", etc. The disappoint
The proof of that is evident on a daily basis.
With
The left comes to the table already having compromise
And even after we compromise
In the end, with the StupakAmen
http://new
Fairly soon, Roe and overturnin
KEEP READING
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Barack Obama To Run Moneyed 2012 Campaign
I also recall Obama saying that it will take a while. But if he did not lay down the groundwork, unemployme nt might have stagnated for a decade.
==========
Now you're just pulling BS out of your butt. Between Joe Biden who said jobs wouldn't come back for a decade and Obama's top economic adviser Christine Roemer who had sharp criticism the other day for his government
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost